Skip to main content

Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results

  • Chapter
Book cover New Directions in Spatial Econometrics

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

It has now been more than two decades since Cliff and Ord (1972) and Hordijk (1974) applied the principle of Moran’s Itest for spatial autocorrelation to the residuals of regression models for cross-sectional data. To date, Moran’sIstatistic is still the most widely applied diagnostic for spatial dependence in regression models [e.g., Johnston (1984), King (1987), Case (1991)]. However, in spite of the well known consequences of ignoring spatial dependence for inference and estimation [for a review, see Anselin (1988a)], testing for this type of misspecification remains rare in applied empirical work, as illustrated in the surveys of Anselin and Griffith (1988) and Anselin and Hudak (1992). In part, this may be due to the rather complex expressions for the moments of Moran’s I, and the difficulties encountered in implementing them in econometric Software [for detailed discussion, see Cliff and Ord (1981), Anselin (1992), Tiefelsdorf and Boots (1994)]. Recently, a number of alternatives to Moran’s Ihave been developed, such as the tests of Burridge (1980) and Anselin (1988b, 1994), which are based on the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) principle, and the robust tests of Bera and Yoon (1992) and Kelejian and Robinson (1992). These tests are all asymptotic and distributed as X 2variates. Since they do not require the computation of specific moments of the statistic, they are easy to implement and straightforward to interpret. However, they are all large sample tests and evidence on their finite sample properties is still limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anselin, L., A Note on Small Sample Properties of Estimators in a First-Order Spatial Autoregressive Model, Environment and Planning A, 14, 1023–1030, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Some Further Notes on Spatial Models and Regional Science, Journal of Regional Science, 26, 799–802, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Lagrange Multiplier Test Diagnostics for Spatial Dependence and Spatial Heterogeneity, Geographical Analysis, 20, 1–17, 1988b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Space Stat: A Program for the Analysis of Spatial Data, Santa Barbara: National Center for Geographie Information and Analysis, University of California, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Testing for Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models: A Review, Morgantown: West Virginia University, Regional Research Institute Research Paper, 94–16, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. and R.J.G.M. Florax, Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results, Morgantown: West Virginia University, Regional Research University Research Paper, 94–14, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. and D.A. Griffith, Do Spatial Effects Really Matter in Regression Analysis?, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 65, 11–34, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. and S. Hudak, Spatial Econometrics in Practice, a Review of Software Options, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 509–536, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. and S. Rey, Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models, Geographical Analysis, 23, 112–131, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, C.P.A. and L. Hordijk, On the Power of the Generalized Moran Contiguity Coefficient in Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation Among Regression Disturbances, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 7, 83–101, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bera, A.K. and C.M. Jarque, Model Specification Tests, A Simultaneous Approach, Journal of Econometrics, 20, 59–82, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bera, A.K. and A. Ullah, Rao’s Score Test in Econometrics, Journal of Quantitative Economics, 7, 189–220, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bera, A.K. and M.J. Yoon, Simple Diagnostic Tests for Spatial Dependence, Champaign: University of Illinois, Department of Economics, 1992 (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boots, B., Evaluating Principal Eigenvalues as Measures of Network Structure, Geographical Analysis, 16, 270–275, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boots, B.N. and G.F. Royle, A Conjecture on the Maximum Value of the Principal Eigenvalue of a Planar Graph, Geographical Analysis, 23, 276–282, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsma, A.S. and R.H. Ketellapper, Further Evidence on Alternative Procedures for Testing of Spatial Autocorrelation Among Regression Disturbances, in: C.P.A. Bartels and R.H. Ketellapper (eds.), Exploratory and Explanatory Statistical Analysis of Spatial Data, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burridge, P., On the Cliff-Ord Test for Spatial Autocorrelation, Journal ofthe Royal Statistical Society B, 42, 107–108, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, A., Spatial Patterns in Household Demand, Econometrica, 59, 953–965, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A. and J.K. Ord, Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation Among Regression Residuals, Geographical Analysis, 4, 267–284, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A. and J.K. Ord, Spatial Processes: Models and Applications, London: Pion, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and J.G. MacKinnon, Estimation andlnference in Econometrics, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florax, R. and H. Folmer, Specification and Estimation of Spatial Linear Regression Models: Monte Carlo Evaluation of Pre-Test Estimators, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 405–432, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florax, R. and H. Folmer, The Relevance of Hendry’s Econometric Methodology in Linear Spatial Process Modeling: Experimental Simulation Results for ML and IV estimators, Working Paper, Department of General Economics, Wageningen Agricultural University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haining, R., Spatial Models and Regional Science: A Comment on Anselin’s Paper and Research Directions, Journal of Regional Science, 26, 793–798, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hordijk, L., Spatial Correlation in the Disturbances of a Linear Interregional Model, Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 117–140, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.S., The Autoregressive Moving Average Model for Spatial Analysis, Australian Journal of Statistics, 26, 169–178, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarque, C.M. and A.K. Bera, Efficient Tests for Normality, Homoscedasticity and Serial Independence in Regression Residuals, Economics Letters, 6, 255–259, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., Econometric Methods, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H.H. and D.P. Robinson, Spatial Autocorrelation: A New Computationally Simple Test with an Application to Per Capita County Policy Expenditures, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 317–331, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H.H. and D.P. Robinson, A Suggested Method of Estimation for Spatial Interdependent Models with Autocorrelated Errors, and an Application to a County Expenditure Model, Papers in Regional Science, 12, 297–312, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian, H.H. and D.P. Robinson, Spatial Correlation: The Cliff and Ord Model and a Suggested Alternative, 1995 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M.L., A Small Sample Property of the Cliff-Ord Test for Spatial Correlation, Journal ofthe Royal Statistical Society B, 43, 263–264, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M.L., Testing for Autocorrelation in Linear Regression Models: A Survey, in: M. King and D. Giles (eds.), Specification Analysis in the Linear Model, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J.K., Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial Interaction, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 120–126, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiefelsdorf, M. and B. Boots, The Exact Distribution of Moran’s I, Environment and Planning A, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anselin, L., Florax, R.J.G.M. (1995). Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results. In: Anselin, L., Florax, R.J.G.M. (eds) New Directions in Spatial Econometrics. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79877-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79877-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79879-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79877-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics