Skip to main content

Mission, Finance, and Innovation: The Similarities and Differences Between Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Business

Abstract

Social business and social entrepreneurship offer an exciting field for empirical and conceptual management research. Yet, while there are many attempts to define either social entrepreneurship or social business, the boundaries and overlaps of both phenomena often remain vague or contested – thus rendering empirical or conceptual learning more difficult. We propose a three-dimensional definitional framework to define social business and social entrepreneurship, distinguish them, and relate them to each other. Our framework interprets the pure forms of both social business and social entrepreneurship as the two-dimensional combination of a pure social mission with either pure financial self-sustainability (social business) or a pure innovation focus (social entrepreneurship). Since the finance and innovation perspective are distinct yet independent dimensions, we derive and illustrate four cases of how social business and social entrepreneurship may but need not overlap. Challenging the assumption that each dimension is confined to two dichotomous values, we then interpret each dimension as a full spectrum and introduce the idea of mission, finance, and innovation hybridity. Our discussion suggests that multidimensional hybridity is the empirical rule rather than the exception. It is for this reason that the study of the pure forms of social business and social entrepreneurship promises particularly fruitful insights for management research. We conclude with implications for future management research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alsop, R. (2007, January 31). How boss’s deeds buff a firm’s reputation. Wall Street Journal. pp. B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Lerts, C. W. (2003). Social entrepreneurship and social transformation: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Studies, 40(3), 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, B. J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Stanford (summer), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2009). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (Dover Philosophical Classics). Mineola: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory (pp. 1–418). Oxford: Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, T. A., Dacin, P., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 36–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship” (pp. 1–5). Retrieved from http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CD8QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.caseatduke.org%2Fdocuments%2Fdees_sedef.pdf&ei=yXS8UKf1N8jitQaCkYDIDw&usg=AFQjCNFtTKSFhxk71lH-hZ8IbAYEG74KiA

  • Dees, J. G. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 55–67. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. In D. Williamson (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding (vol. 3, pp. 39–66). Indianapolis: ARNOVA. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Framing+a+theory+of+social+entrepreneurship:+Building+on+two+schools+of+practice+and+thought#0

  • Defourney, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergence and divergence. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Practice and principles. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349. doi:10.1177/014920630302900304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business (p. 417). Chichester: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. (1984). Stakeholder management. A strategic approach. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEM. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor report. Retrieved from http://www.gemconsortium.org

  • Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K. (2006). CafeDirect: Fair trade as social entrepreneurship. In F. Perrini (Ed.), What awaits social entrepreneurial ventures? (pp. 192–209). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J., Badiane, K. K., & Haigh, N. (2012). Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit & non-profit divide. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive social change and organizations: Building and theoretical and research foundation (pp. 131–153). New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzer, K., & Jager, U. (2011). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 634–661. doi:10.1177/0899764010369386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, J. (2006). Winning the battle for freedom and prosperity. Liberty, 20(6), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J. (2006). Introduction to Part II: Exploring the intentions and opportunities behind social entrepreneurship. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 89–95). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1998). In R. Crisp (Ed.), Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (2012). Social enterprise in health organisation and management: Hybridity or homogeneity? Journal of Health Organization and Management, 26(2), 143–148. doi:10.1108/14777261211230817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T. W., Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(4), 805–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. J., & Coombes, S. M. (2008). A model of social entrepreneurial discovery. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 325–336. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9921-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). Inside the hybrid organization: An organizational level view of responses to conflicting institutional demands. Fontainebleau: INSEAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1944). The poverty of historicism, I. Economica, 11(42), 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. (2011, January–February). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review. pp. 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, V. K., & Thulasiraj, R. D. (2007). Making sight affordable (Innovations case narrative: The Aravind Eye Care System). Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(4), 35–49. doi:10.1162/itgg.2007.2.4.35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salam, A. (2005). Unification of fundamental forces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattar, Z. (2012). Social business: Capitalism with a human face. Social Business, 2(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, democracy. New York/London: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., Besharow, M. I., Wessels, A. K., & Chertok, M. (2012). Paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, N., Henning, C., & Weiler, B. (2006). The moralization of the markets. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchmann, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, W.-L., Williams, J., & Tan, T.-M. (2005). Defining the “social” in “social entrepreneurship”. Altruism and Entrepreneurship, 1, 353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logic. In R. Greenwood, C. Olivier, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Volery, T., & Hackl, V. (2010). The promise of social franchising as a model to achieve social goals. In A. Fayolle & H. Matlay (Eds.), Handbook of research on social entrepreneurship (pp. 155–179). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, A. J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. (1977). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. In B. Weisbrod (Ed.), The voluntary nonprofit sector (pp. 51–76). Lexington: DC Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., & Post, J. E. (2011). Business models for people, planet (& profits): Exploring the phenomena of social business, a market-based approach to social value creation. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9401-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yujuico, E. (2008). Connecting the dots in social entrepreneurship through the capabilities approach. Socio-Economic Review, 6(3), 493–513. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2003). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2007). Creating a world without poverty. How social business can transform our lives: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2010). Building social business. The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, R. (2010). Innovations in doing and being: Capability innovations at the intersection of Schumpeterian political economy and human development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Beckmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beckmann, M., Zeyen, A., Krzeminska, A. (2014). Mission, Finance, and Innovation: The Similarities and Differences Between Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business. In: Grove, A., Berg, G. (eds) Social Business. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45275-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics