Skip to main content

Moral Guilt: An Agent-Based Model Analysis

  • Conference paper
Advances in Social Simulation

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 229))

  • 1720 Accesses

Abstract

In this article we analyze the influence of a concrete moral emotion (i.e. moral guilt) on strategic decision making. We present a normal form Prisoner’s Dilemma with a moral component. We assume that agents evaluate the game’s outcomes with respect to their ideality degree (i.e. how much a given outcome conforms to the player’s moral values), based on two proposed notions on ethical preferences: Harsanyi’s and Rawls’. Based on such game, we construct and agent-based model of moral guilt, where the intensity of an agent’s guilt feeling plays a determinant role in her course of action. Results for both constructions of ideality are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179–211 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489), 1390–1396 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Battigalli, P., Dufwenberg, M.: Guilt in games. The American Economic Review 97(2), 170–176 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumeister, R.F., Stillwell, A.M., Heatherton, T.F.: Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin 115, 243–267 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benabou, R., Tirole, J.: Incentives and prosocial behavior. The American Economic Review 96(5), 1652–1678 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Binmore, K.: Natural justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowles, S., Gintis, H.: Prosocial emotions. Working Paper 02-07-028, Santa Fe Institute (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, G.W.: Iterative solutions of games by fictitious play. In: Koopmans, T.C. (ed.) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, pp. 374–376. Wiley, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Charness, G., Dufwenberg, M.: Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74, 1579–1601 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheung, Y., Friedman, D.: A comparison of learning and replicator dynamics using experimental data. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35, 263–280 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawkins, R.: The God Delusion. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fehr, E., Gaechter, S.: Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3), 159–181 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frank, R.H.: The Status of Moral Emotions in Consequentialist Moral Reasoning. In: Zak, P.J. (ed.) Moral Markets: The Critical Role of Values in the Economy. Princeton University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fudenberg, D., Levine, D.: Learning in Games. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Halpern, J., Pass, R.: Iterated regret minimization: a new solution concept. Games and Economic Behavior 74(1), 194–207 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Harsanyi, J.C.: Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63, 309–321 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harsanyi, J.C.: Morality and the theory of rational behaviour. In: Sen, A.K., Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond, pp. 39–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Loomes, G., Sugden, R.: Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal 92(368), 805–824 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Loomes, G., Sugden, R.: Testing for regret and disappointment in choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal 97, 118–129 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mansbridge, J.J.: Beyond self-interest. University of Chicago Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Poundstone, W.: Prisoner’s Dilemma. Doubleday, NY (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rawls, J.: A theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson, J.: An iterative method of solving a game. Annals of Mathematics 54(2), 296–301 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Searle, J.: Rationality in Action. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sen, A.: Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taillandier, P., Vo, D.-A., Amouroux, E., Drogoul, A.: GAMA: A simulation platform that integrates geographical information data, agent-based modeling and multi-scale control. In: Desai, N., Liu, A., Winikoff, M. (eds.) PRIMA 2010. LNCS, vol. 7057, pp. 242–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Weibull, J.: Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoit Gaudou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gaudou, B., Lorini, E., Mayor, E. (2014). Moral Guilt: An Agent-Based Model Analysis. In: Kamiński, B., Koloch, G. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 229. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39828-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39829-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics