Skip to main content

Human Rights and Dignity: Lessons from the Canterbury Rebuild and Recovery Effort

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Asia-Pacific Disaster Management

Abstract

Unless the needs of vulnerable populations are addressed during all three phases of emergency response operations—preparation, the event, and recovery—members of these communities are likely to suffer disproportionate harm in disasters. Vulnerable groups may include disabled people, women, children, elderly persons, certain members of ethnic minorities, people with language barriers, and the impoverished. The existing normative frameworks, natural human rights laws and emergency response laws entitle vulnerable populations to some protection. However, the clear shortcomings of the current normative scheme(s) create uncertainty and highlight the need for greater clarity as to how to better protect human rights in disaster management and recovery. This chapter will analyse the New Zealand Government’s response to the September 2010 and February 2011 Canterbury earthquakes, and how their response affected the rights of the most vulnerable people in society. It considers the gaps in the Government’s response, identifies some good practice and explores opportunities to do things differently to enhance the social, economic and cultural wellbeing of communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    US Department of Homeland Security (2008), p. 27 (identifying three phases of effective response as ‘prepare, respond and recover’).

  2. 2.

    Miyamoto (1998), pp. 46–58.

  3. 3.

    Yasui (1997).

  4. 4.

    Nihon Jutaku Kaigi (1996).

  5. 5.

    Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management (2012).

  6. 6.

    Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management (2012), p. 10.

  7. 7.

    Convention Establishing an International Relief Union 1932.

  8. 8.

    International Law Commission (2007), paras 3–4.

  9. 9.

    International Law Commission (2010a, b), Art. 8.

  10. 10.

    International Law Commission (2010b), pp. 12–13.

  11. 11.

    Ebersole (1995), p. 196.

  12. 12.

    International Law Commission (2010a), Art. 7.

  13. 13.

    Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Res 217A (III) (1948) (UDHR).

  14. 14.

    Art. 55 charges the UN to promote respect for and observance of universal human rights for all, and Art. 56 charges each member nation to help the UN to achieve goals set forth in Art. 55.

  15. 15.

    The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, for example, contemplates that during public emergency, there may be some derogation from the full rights in the Covenant but it clearly limits this to the degree strictly necessary and limits which rights may be derogated from.

  16. 16.

    UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1991), para 8(e).

  17. 17.

    CRPD, Art. 11.

  18. 18.

    Secretariat for the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2007), p. 4.

  19. 19.

    The Sphere Project (2011).

  20. 20.

    The Brookings – Bern Project on Internal Displacement (2011).

  21. 21.

    UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) (2004).

  22. 22.

    UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA) (2002).

  23. 23.

    The Sphere Project (2011), p. 36.

  24. 24.

    The Sphere Project (2011), p. 37.

  25. 25.

    The Brookings – Bern Project on Internal Displacement (2011), p. 2.

  26. 26.

    UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2002), para 54.

  27. 27.

    UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2002), para 56.

  28. 28.

    UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2002), para 56.

  29. 29.

    Tavita v Minister of Immigration [1994] 2 NZLR 257, p. 266.

  30. 30.

    Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA), title.

  31. 31.

    HRA, s. 21(h).

  32. 32.

    HRA, s. 21(i).

  33. 33.

    HRA, s. 21(k).

  34. 34.

    New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (BORA), s. 3.

  35. 35.

    BORA.

  36. 36.

    Rishworth et al. (2003), p. 74.

  37. 37.

    BORA, s. 5.

  38. 38.

    Susman et al. (1983).

  39. 39.

    Susman et al. (1983).

  40. 40.

    For further discussion on the Recovery Legislation see Toomey (2013), in this volume.

  41. 41.

    CER Act, s. 71.

  42. 42.

    CER Act, s. 6(3).

  43. 43.

    CER Act, s. 19.

  44. 44.

    CER Act, s. 20.

  45. 45.

    UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1991), para 7.

  46. 46.

    Takada (1998), p. 157.

  47. 47.

    Takada (1998), p. 157.

  48. 48.

    UNDRO (1982).

  49. 49.

    See the Italian Government’s response to the L’Aquila earthquake.

  50. 50.

    Giovinazzi et al. (2012).

  51. 51.

    World Bank Group (2005), p. 4.

  52. 52.

    See UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2006).

  53. 53.

    UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) (2004). Although not legally binding the Guiding Principles draw on and are consistent with human rights law, humanitarian law and refugee law.

  54. 54.

    New Zealand House of Representatives (2012), pp. 4–5.

  55. 55.

    See, for example, Quake Outcasts v The Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery and Chief Executive of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery CIV-2013-409-843 (HC).

  56. 56.

    Disabled Persons Assembly (2010), p. 41.

  57. 57.

    Anonymous Respondent and Office for Disability Issues (2012).

  58. 58.

    MacNiell (2012).

  59. 59.

    The New Zealand Ambassador to the UN, Don MacKay was the Chair of the initial Working Group and then the Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee that created the CRPD.

  60. 60.

    Ministry of Social Development (2011), p. 17.

  61. 61.

    Convention Coalition (2012), p. 19.

  62. 62.

    Gorman (2012).

  63. 63.

    Lovelle (2012).

  64. 64.

    Privacy Act 1993, ss. 66 and 6 Principle 11(f).

  65. 65.

    Christchurch Earthquake (Information Sharing) Code 2011 (Temporary), cl. 4(2).

  66. 66.

    Christchurch Earthquake (Information Sharing) Code 2011 (Temporary), cl. 2(b).

  67. 67.

    Privacy (Information Sharing) Bill 2012.

  68. 68.

    Office for Senior Citizens (2011), p. 6.

  69. 69.

    Lovelle (2012).

  70. 70.

    Carswell (2011).

  71. 71.

    Carswell (2011), p. 13.

  72. 72.

    Carswell (2011), p. 21.

  73. 73.

    Carswell (2011), p. 23.

  74. 74.

    Shuttleworth (2012).

  75. 75.

    Simpson v Attorney-General [1994] 3 NZLR 667 (CA), p. 676.

  76. 76.

    Simpson v Attorney-General [1994], p. 676.

  77. 77.

    See Geiringer et al. (2011).

  78. 78.

    Gould (2009), p. 193.

References

Documents and Materials

  • Charter of the United Nations, 26 June 1945, 1 UNTS XVI (entered into force 24 October 1945)

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 10 December 1984, 1465 UNTS 85 (entered into force 26 June 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention Establishing an International Relief Union, 12 July 1927, 135 LNTS 247 (entered into force 27 December 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 18 December 1979, 1249 UNTS 13 (entered into force 3 September 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 13 December 2006, 2515 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 May 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted 20 November 1989, 1577 UNTS 3 (entered into force 2 September 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, 7 March 1966, 660 UNTS 195 (entered into force 4 January 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, 18 December 1990, 2220 UNTS 3 (entered into force 1 July 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171 (entered into force 23 March 1976) (‘ICCPR’)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 19 December 1966, 993 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 January 1976) (‘ICESCR’)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Law Commission (2007) Protection of persons in the event of disasters: Memorandum by the secretariat. UN Doc. A/CN. 4/590 646

    Google Scholar 

  • International Law Commission (2010a) Protection of persons in the event of disasters: third report on the protection of persons in the event of disasters, by Mr Eduardo Valencia-Ospina, Special Rapporteur. UN Doc. A/CN. 4/629 649

    Google Scholar 

  • International Law Commission (2010b) Protection of persons in the event of disasters: texts and titles of draft articles 6, 7, 8 and 9 provisionally adopted by the Drafting Committee on 6, 7 and 8 July 2010 (Draft Articles) UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.776

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson v Attorney-General, [1994] 3 NZLR 667 (CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavita v Minister of Immigration, [1994] 2 NZLR 257

    Google Scholar 

  • The Brookings – Bern Project on Internal Displacement (2011) Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Operational Guidelines on the Protection of Persons in Situations of natural Disasters

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sphere Project (2011) Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response. http://www.sphereproject.org/resources/download-publications/?search=1&keywords=&language=English&category=22. Accessed 27 Nov 2012

  • UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1991) General Comment 4: The right to adequate housing (Art. 11(1)). UN Doc. E/1992/23

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA) (2002) Madrid international plan of action on ageing. http://social.un.org/ageing-working-group/documents/mipaa-en.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2012

  • UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) (2004) Guiding principles on internal displacement. UN Doc. E/CN. 4/1998/53/Add. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) (2006) Exploring key changes and developments in post disaster settlement, shelter and housing, 1982–2006: Scoping study to inform the revision of ‘Shelter after Disaster: Guidelines for Assistance’. UN Doc. OCHA/ESB/2006/6

    Google Scholar 

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Res 217A (III) (1948)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. V. White .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, M.J.V., Grieve, A. (2014). Human Rights and Dignity: Lessons from the Canterbury Rebuild and Recovery Effort. In: Butt, S., Nasu, H., Nottage, L. (eds) Asia-Pacific Disaster Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39768-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics