Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of Socio-Technical Research Methods in Understanding the Genesis and Potential Sustainability of Planning Support Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC,volume 195))

Abstract

This research compares two methodologies to gain an insight into which may best fit the research of Planning Support Systems (PSS) used in planning practice. The approach taken by this research is twofold; firstly using data collected through case studies and the application of Actor-Network Theory (ANT), and secondly, an online questionnaire of staff in government and private practice. The questionnaire data was analysed using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Results of applying ANT can provide useful insights into the social and technical interactions that are relied upon to build and implement a PSS. Moreover, the UTAUT results found that in order for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) applications to be widely accepted by planners, the organizations in which they work need to address performance expectancy and facilitating conditions as priorities. Although the methods used in this research are vastly different, results have been found to be somewhat complimentary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aslıgül Göçmen A, Ventura SJ (2010) Barriers to GIS use in planning. J Am Plann Assoc 76(2):172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2008) Planning support systems: progress, predictions, and speculations on the shape of things to come. In: Brail R (ed) Planning support systems for cities and regions. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder G, Boldero JM (2012) Planning for change: the roles of habitual practice and habitus in planning practice. Urban Policy Res 30(2):175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brail RK (2009) Planning support systems: bridging the gap between technology and user. Paper presented at 11th international conference on computers in urban planning and urban management, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 16–18 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (1986) Some elements of sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed) Power, action, and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? Sociological review monograph no. 32. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H (2005) Where has the future gone? Rethinking the role of integrated land use models in spatial planning. Environ Plan A 37(8):1353–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Planning (2007) Improving the NSW planning system: discussion paper, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertman S (2006) Potentials for planning support: a planning-conceptual approach. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 33:863–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertman S (2008) Planning support systems: a planner’s perspective. In: Brail RK (ed) Planning support systems for cities and regions. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertman S, Stillwell J (2004) Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(2):291–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris B (1989) Beyond geographic information systems-computers and the planning professional. J Am Plan Assoc 55(1):85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris B, Batty M (1993) Locational models geographic information and planning support systems. J Plan Educ Res 12(2):184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman RE (2001) Planning support systems: a new perspective on computer aided planning. In: Klosterman RE, Brail RK (eds) Planning support systems: integrated geographic information systems, models and visualization tools. ESRI Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman RE, Pettit C (2005) Guest editorial: an update on planning support systems. Environ Plan B Plan Des 32(4):477–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1986) The powers of association. In: Law J (ed) Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? sociological review monograph 32. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Law J (1986) The heterogeneity of texts. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A (eds) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Law J, Callon M (1992) The life and death of an aircraft: a network analysis of technical change. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin EW (2000) Actor-networks and implementation: examples from conservation GIS in ecuador. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 14(8):715–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster T, Wastell D (2005) Diffusion—or delusion? challenging an IS research tradition. Inf Technol People 18(4):383–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster T, Vidgen RT, Wastell DG (1997) Towards an understanding of technology in transition: two conflicting theories. Paper presented at information systems research in Scandinavia, IRIS20 conference, University of Oslo, Hanko

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles JA (2012) Management and organizational theory. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitev NN (2005) Are social constructivist approaches critical? The case if IS failure. In: Howcroft D, Truath EM (eds) Handbook of critical information systems research: theory and application. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro E (2000) Actor-network theory and information infrastructure. In: Ciborra CU (ed) From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore T (2008) Planning support systems: what are practicing planners looking for? In: Brail RK (ed) Planning support systems for cities and regions. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit C, Keysers J, Bishop I, Klosterman RE (2008) Applying the what if? planning support system for better understanding urban fringe growth. In: Pettit C, Cartwright W, Bishop I, Lowell K, Puller D, Duncan D (eds) Landscape analysis and visualization: spatial models for natural resource management and planning. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodger K, Moore SA, Newsome D (2009) Wildlife tourism science and actor network theory. Ann Tourism Res 36(4):645–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon P (2010) The next wave of technologies: opportunities in chaos. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatnall A (2000) Working paper: information systems innovation—two different models. School of Information Systems, Victoria University, Victory, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatnall A, Burgess S (2002) Using actor-network theory to research the implementation of B–B portal for regional SMEs in Melbourne, Australia. Paper presented at 15th electronic commerce conference and reality: constructing the e-economy, Bled, Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatnall A, Gilding A (1999) Actor-network theory and information systems research. Paper presented at 10th Australasian conference in information systems

    Google Scholar 

  • te Brömmelstroet MCG, Schrijnen PM (2010) From planning support systems to mediated planning support: a structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 37(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk G, Geertman S, Schot P (2005) Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environ Plan A 37(5):909–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk G, Geertman S, Schot P (2007a) A SWOT analysis of planning support systems. Environ Plan A 39:1699–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk G, Geertman S, Schot P (2007b) New technologies stuck in old hierarchies: the diffusion of geo-information technologies in Dutch public organizations. Public Adm Rev 67(4):745–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson W, Parolin B (2012) Investigating E-planning in practice: an actor-network case study approach. Int J E-Plan Res 1(3):68–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of the Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Wayne Williamson & Bruno Parolin

Authors
  1. Wayne Williamson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruno Parolin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne Williamson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, 3508, Netherlands

    Stan Geertman

  2. , Faculty of Geosciences, Departm., Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, 3508, Utrecht, Netherlands

    Fred Toppen

  3. , School of Geography, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom

    John Stillwell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williamson, W., Parolin, B. (2013). Application of Socio-Technical Research Methods in Understanding the Genesis and Potential Sustainability of Planning Support Systems. In: Geertman, S., Toppen, F., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation