Skip to main content

Classification of Opinion Questions

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7814))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the increasing growth of opinions on news, services and so on, automatic opinion question answering aims at answering questions involving views of persons, and plays an important role in fields of sentiment analysis and information recommendation. One challenge is that opinion questions may contain different types of question focuses that affect answer extraction, such as holders, comparison and location. In this paper, we build a taxonomy of opinion questions, and propose a hierarchical classification technique to classify opinion questions according to our constructed taxonomy. This technique first uses Bayesian classifier and then employs an approach leveraging semantic similarities between questions. Experimental results show that our approach significantly improves performances over baseline and other related works.

The work is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#61272361, #61250010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Li, T., Ge, Z., Yao, T.: Research on Chinese Sentiment Question Category Classification. Journal of Chinese Information Processing 25, 94–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, C., Yin, H., Wang, L.: A study of opinion question sentence classification in question & answering system. Microcomputer Information 25, 166–168 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stoyanov, V., Cardie, C., Wiebe, J.: Multi-perspective question answering using the OpQA corpus. In: Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 923–930. ACL, Stroudsburg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang, P., Fu, H., Zhang, C., Niu, Z.: A framework for opinion question answering. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Information Management and Service, pp. 424–427. IEEE Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, G.: Study on the analysis for Chinese opinion question and Chinese comparative opinion QA. PhD Diss. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xiang, S., Nie, F., Zhang, C.: Learning a Mahalanobis distance metric for data clustering and classification. Pattern Recognition 41, 3600–3612 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fu, H., Niu, Z., Zhang, C., Wang, L., Jiang, P., Zhang, J. (2013). Classification of Opinion Questions. In: Serdyukov, P., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7814. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36973-5_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36973-5_67

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36972-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36973-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics