Skip to main content

Measuring the Performance of Online Opponent Models in Automated Bilateral Negotiation

  • Conference paper
AI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7691))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An important aim in bilateral negotiations is to achieve a win-win solution for both parties; therefore, a critical aspect of a negotiating agent’s success is its ability to take the opponent’s preferences into account. Every year, new negotiation agents are introduced with better learning techniques to model the opponent. Our main goal in this work is to evaluate and compare the performance of a selection of state-of-the-art online opponent modeling techniques in negotiation, and to determine under which circumstances they are beneficial in a real-time, online negotiation setting. Towards this end, we provide an overview of the factors influencing the quality of a model and we analyze how the performance of opponent models depends on the negotiation setting. This results in better insight into the performance of opponent models, and allows us to pinpoint well-performing opponent modeling techniques that did not receive much previous attention in literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Gerding, E.H., Hindriks, K., Ito, T., Jennings, N.R., Jonker, C., Kraus, S., Lin, R., Robu, V., Williams, C.R.: Evaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition. Artificial Intelligence Journal (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., Hendrikx, M., Dirkzwager, A., Jonker, C.: Decoupling negotiating agents to explore the space of negotiation strategies. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations, ACAN 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.: A Tit for Tat Negotiation Strategy for Real-Time Bilateral Negotiations. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Matsuo, T. (eds.) Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions. SCI, vol. 435, pp. 231–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C., Kraus, S., Lin, R.: The First Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC 2010). In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 113–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Buffett, S., Spencer, B.: A bayesian classifier for learning opponents’ preferences in multi-object automated negotiation. ECRA 6, 274–284 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coehoorn, R., Jennings, N.: Learning an opponent’s preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation trade-offs. In: Proceedings of the ICEC 2004, pp. 59–68. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3-4), 159–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Galen Last, N.: Agent Smith: Opponent Model Estimation in Bilateral Multi-issue Negotiation. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 167–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hindriks, K., Jonker, C., Tykhonov, D.: Negotiation dynamics: Analysis, concession tactics, and outcomes. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 427–433. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hindriks, K., Tykhonov, D.: Opponent modelling in automated multi-issue negotiation using bayesian learning. In: Proceedings of the 7th AAMAS 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hindriks, K.V., Tykhonov, D.: Towards a Quality Assessment Method for Learning Preference Profiles in Negotiation. In: Ketter, W., La Poutré, H., Sadeh, N., Shehory, O., Walsh, W. (eds.) AMEC 2008. LNBIP, vol. 44, pp. 46–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kersten, G.E., Zhang, G.: Mining inspire data for the determinants of successful internet negotiations. Central European Journal of Operational Research (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klos, T., Somefun, K., La Poutré, H.: Automated interactive sales processes. IEEE Intelligent Systems 26, 54–61 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Krimpen, T., Looije, D., Hajizadeh, S.: HardHeaded. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Matsuo, T. (eds.) Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions. SCI, vol. 435, pp. 225–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Baarslag, T., Tykhonov, D., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M.: Genius: An integrated environment for supporting the design of generic automated negotiators. In: Computational Intelligence (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Barry, J.: Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Ai 172, 823–851 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 50, 97–109 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Dan Şerban, L., Silaghi, G.C., Litan, C.M.: AgentFSEGA: Time Constrained Reasoning Model for Bilateral Multi-issue Negotiations. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 159–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson, L.: The Mind and heart of the negotiator, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle River (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Williams, C.R., Robu, V., Gerding, E.H., Jennings, N.R.: IAMhaggler: A Negotiation Agent for Complex Environments. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 151–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal of Human-Computers Studies 48(1), 125–141 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baarslag, T., Hendrikx, M., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C. (2012). Measuring the Performance of Online Opponent Models in Automated Bilateral Negotiation. In: Thielscher, M., Zhang, D. (eds) AI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7691. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35101-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35101-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35100-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35101-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics