Skip to main content

Knocking Sound as Quality Sign for Household Appliances and the Evaluation of the Audio-Haptic Interaction

  • Conference paper
Haptic and Audio Interaction Design (HAID 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7468))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It has been known for a long time in the automobile industry that the first contact between the customer and a car in the showroom consists of opening the door, sitting in the car and closing the door. Therefore, the sounds of the door opening and closing are carefully designed to invoke feelings of high quality and safety in the customer. Of course, the vehicle’s operating noises are equally crucial to the perception of overall quality.

The operating noises of household appliances have gained increasing importance because these noises can negatively or positively influence our daily life. When shopping, customers consider the sound power level of the household appliance provided by the manufacturers. In most cases, it is not possible to listen to the machine in operation. However, a common practice of customers is to knock the sidewalls or open and close the doors of the machine. The knocking sound carries information about the quality and solidity of the product and its material properties. The perception of the knocking sound is normally coupled to a tactile/kinesthetic impression of the knocking event. The aims of this study are to identify the perceptually important features of the knocking sound that affect the impression of quality, define the guidelines for a target sound, make suggestions regarding structural modifications to realize the target sound, and investigate the interaction between auditory and haptic stimuli in the overall product-quality assessment. To achieve these aims, experiments with unimodal and multimodal stimulus presentations were conducted. The results showed that an optimal knocking sound is dull, moderately loud, atonal, and has no distinctive long-lasting frequency components, particularly at high frequencies. A quality index was proposed based on psychoacoustic metrics. The physical coupling between the sound and the vibrations causes that both sensory cues have similar effects on perceived quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Giordano, B.L.: Sound Source Perception in Impact Sounds. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Padova, Italy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jekosch, U.: Meaning in the Context of Sound Quality Assessment. Acta Acustica 85, 681–684 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klatzky, R.L., Pai, D.K., Krotkov, E.P.: Perception of Material from Contact Sounds. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environment 9(4), 399–410 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lakatos, S., McAdams, S., Caussé, R.: The Representation of Auditory Source Characteristics: Simple Geometric Form. Perception & Psychophysics 59(8), 1180–1190 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parizet, E., Guyader, E., Nosulenko, V.: Analysis of Car Door Closing Sound Quality. Applied Acoustics 69, 12–22 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liebing, R.: Subjektive Bewertung von instationären Funktionsgeräuschen. Ph.D. Thesis, Oldenburg University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henn, H., Sinambari, G.R., Fallen, M.: Ingenieurakustik. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leissa, A.W.: Vibration of Plates. NASA SP-160, Washington D.C. (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Altinsoy, M.E., Jekosch, U.: The Semantic Space of Vehicle Sounds: Developing a Semantic Differential with Regard to Customer Perception. Journal of Audio Engineering Society 60(1/2), 13–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tarnoczy, T.: Vibration of metal plates covered with vibration damping layers. Journal of Sound and Vibration 11, 299–307 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Von Bismarck, G.: Timbre of steady sounds: a factorial investigation of its verbal attributes. Acustica 30, 146–158 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. DIN 45631/A1: Calculation of loudness level and loudness from the sound spectrum - Zwicker method – Amend. 1: Calculation of the loudness of time-variant sound (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aures, W.: Berechnungsverfahren für den sensorischen Wohlklang beliebiger Schallsignale. Acustica 59, 130–141 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Altinsoy, M.E.: Auditory-Tactile Interaction in Virtual Environments. Shaker Verlag, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Altinsoy, M.E. (2012). Knocking Sound as Quality Sign for Household Appliances and the Evaluation of the Audio-Haptic Interaction. In: Magnusson, C., Szymczak, D., Brewster, S. (eds) Haptic and Audio Interaction Design. HAID 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7468. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32796-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32796-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32795-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32796-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics