Skip to main content

Masking Effects for Damping JND

  • Conference paper
Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication (EuroHaptics 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7283))

Abstract

Two psychophysical experiments are conducted to identify masking effects for the perception of damping. The results indicate that the just noticeable difference for damping increases with the magnitude of additional masking stimuli. This is the case for environments consisting of a damping/stiffness and environments consisting of a damping/inertia. This has implications for the design and evaluation of haptic human-system interfaces, telepresence systems and haptic rendering algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beauregard, G., Srinivasan, M., Durlach, N.: The manual resolution of viscosity and mass. In: ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, vol. 1, pp. 657–662 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gescheider, G., Bolanowski, S., Verrillo, R.: Vibrotactile masking: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and stimulus frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hirche, S., Buss, M.: Human Perceived Transparency with Time Delay. In: Ferre, M., et al. (eds.) Advances in Telerobotics. STAR, vol. 31, pp. 191–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, L., Hunter, I.: A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Experimental Brain Research 94(2), 343–351 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaernbach, C.: Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 63(8), 1377–1388 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schauß, T., Peer, A.: Parameter-space transparency analysis of teleoperation systems. In: IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), pp. 111–116 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tan, H., Srinivasan, M., Eberman, B., Cheng, B.: Human factors for the design of force-reflecting haptic interfaces. Dynamic Systems and Control 55(1), 353–359 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, B., Klatzky, R.L., Hollis, R.L.: Force, torque, and stiffness: Interactions in perceptual discrimination. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 4(3), 221–228 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rank, M., Schauß, T., Peer, A., Hirche, S., Klatzky, R.L. (2012). Masking Effects for Damping JND. In: Isokoski, P., Springare, J. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication. EuroHaptics 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31404-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31404-9_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31403-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31404-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics