Abstract
The Open Linguistics Working Group (OWLG) is an initiative of experts from different fields concerned with linguistic data, including academic linguistics (e.g. typology, corpus linguistics), applied linguistics (e.g. computational linguistics, lexicography and language documentation) and NLP (e.g. from the Semantic Web community). The primary goals of the working group are 1) the promotion of the idea of open linguistic resources 2) the development of means for their representation, and 3) encouraging the exchange of ideas across different disciplines.
To a certain extent, the activities of the Open Linguistics Working Group converge towards the creation of a Linguistic Linked Open Data cloud, which is a topic addressed from different angles by several members. Some of these activities are described further in the other contributions of this part.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Busemann A, Busemann K (2008) Toolbox self-training. Tech. rep., http://www.sil.org, version 1.5.4, Oct 2008
Chiarcos C (this vol.) Interoperability of corpora and annotations. pp 161–179
Chiarcos C, Hellmann S, Nordhoff S (this vol.) Linking linguistic resources: Examples from the Open Linguistics Working Group. pp 201–216
Farrar S, Langendoen DT (2003) A Linguistic Ontology for the Semantic Web. GLOT International 7:97–100
Giordano R (1995) The TEI header and the documentation of electronic texts. Computers and the Humanities 29(1):75–84
Hellmann S, Stadler C, Lehmann J (this vol.) The German DBpedia: A sense repository for linking entities. pp 181–189
Hellwig B, Uytvanck DV, Hulsbosch M (2008) ELAN - Linguistic Annotator. Tech. rep., http://www.lat-mpi.eu/tools/elan, version of 2008-07-31
Ide N, Suderman K (2007) GrAF: A graph-based format for linguistic annotations. In: Proc. Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW 2007), Prague, Czech Republic, pp 1–8
Ide N, Veronis J (1995) Text encoding initiative: Background and contexts. Kluwer Academic Pub
Kemps-Snijders M, Windhouwer M, Wittenburg P, Wright S (2009) ISOcat: Remodelling metadata for language resources. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 4(4):261–276
Marcus M, Santorini B, Marcinkiewicz M (1994) Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19(2):313–330
Nordhoff S (this vol.) Linked Data for linguistic diversity research: Glottolog/Langdoc and ASJP. pp 191–200
Weibel S, Kunze J, Lagoze C, Wolf M (1998) RFC 2413 - Dublin Core metadata for resource discovery. http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt
Zeldes A, Ritz J, Lüdeling A, Chiarcos C (2009) ANNIS: A search tool for multi-layer annotated corpora. In: Proc. Corpus Linguistics, Liverpool, UK, pp 20–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chiarcos, C., Hellmann, S., Nordhoff, S. (2012). The Open Linguistics Working Group of the Open Knowledge Foundation. In: Chiarcos, C., Nordhoff, S., Hellmann, S. (eds) Linked Data in Linguistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28249-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28249-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28248-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28249-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)