Abstract
The concept of path dependence has rapidly assumed the status of a “fundamental principle” in the new paradigm of evolutionary economic geography that has emerged over the past few years. This chapter reviews the interpretation and use of this concept within this new field. The dominant interpretation has been that of “lock-in,” by self-reinforcing mechanisms, of particular (equilibrium) patterns of industrial location and regional specialization. This model is somewhat restrictive, however, and does not capture the full repertoire of ongoing path-dependent evolutionary trajectories that can be observed in the economic landscape. To respond to this limitation, the chapter suggests a “developmental–evolutionary” model of path dependence that includes “lock-in” as a special case, but which is also more general in its application and relevance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and ‘lock-in’ by historical events. Econ J 99(March):116–131
Arthur WB (1994) Industry location patterns and the importance of history. In: Arthur WB (ed) Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Michigan University Press, Michigan, pp 49–68
Boschma R, Frenken K (2006) Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? J Econ Geogr 6(3):272–302
Boschma R, Martin RL (2007) Constructing an evolutionary economic geography. J Econ Geogr 7(5):537–548, Special Issue: Evolutionary Economic Geography
Boschma R, Martin RL (eds) (2010) Handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Castaldi C, Dosi G (2006) The grip of history and the scope for novelty: some results and open questions on path dependence in economic processes. In: Wimmer A, Kössler R (eds) Understanding change: models, methodologies and metaphors. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 99–128
Coe N (2011) Geographies of production, 1: an evolutionary revolution? Prog Hum Geogr 35(1):81–91
David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75(2):332–337
David PA (1986) Understanding the economics of QWERTY: the necessity of history. In: Parket WN (ed) Economic history and the modern economics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 30–49
David PA (2005) Path dependence in economic processes: implications for policy analysis in dynamical systems contexts. In: Dopfer K (ed) The evolutionary foundations of economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 151–194
David PA (2007) Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica 1(2):91–114
Garretsen H, Martin RL (2010) Rethinking (new) economic geography models: taking geography and history more seriously. Spat Econ Anal 5(2):127–160
Garud R, Karnøe P (2001) Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In: Garud R, Karnøe P (eds) Path dependence and creation. Lawrence Erlbaum, London, pp 1–38
Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Karnøe P (2010) Path dependence or path creation? J Manage Stud 47(4):760–774
Grabher G (ed) (1993) The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the ruhr area. The embedded firm. Routledge, London, pp 255–277
Hassink R (2010) Regional resilience: a promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability? Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3(1):45–58
Krugman P (1991) History and industry location: the case of the manufacturing belt. Am Econ Rev 81(2):80–83
MacKinnon D, Cumbers A, Pike A, Birch K, McMaster R (2009) Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Econ Geogr 85(2):129–150
Malerba F (2010) Industry evolution and history–friendly models. Plenary paper, international schumpeter society conference on innovation, organisation, sustainability and crisis, Aalborg, 21–24 June 2010. http://www.schumpeter2010.dk/index.php/schumpeter/schumpeter2010/paper/viewFile/491/208. Accessed June 2011
Martin RL (2010a) Roepke lecture in economic geography – rethinking regional path dependence: beyond lock-in to evolution. Econ Geogr 86(1):1–27
Martin RL (2010b) The ‘new economic geography: credible models of the economic landscape? In: Lee R, Leyshon A, McDowell L, Sunley P (eds) The Sage companion to economic geography. Sage, London, pp 53–72
Martin RL (2012a) (Re)Placing path dependence: a response to the debate. Int J Urban Reg Res 36(1):179–192
Martin RL (2012b) Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. J Econ Geogr 12(1):1–32
Martin RL, Sunley PJ (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 6(4):395–437
Martin RL, Sunley PJ (2011) Conceptualising cluster evolution: beyond the life cycle model? Reg Stud 45(10):1295–1318, (with P.J. Sunley) Special Issue on Cluster Life Cycles, Eds. R. Boschma and D. Fornahl
Metcalfe JS, Foster J, Ramlogan R (2006) Adaptive economic growth. Camb J Econ 30(1):7–32
Oosterlynck S (2012) Path dependence: a political economy perspective. Int J Urban Reg Res 36(1):158–165
Page S (2006) Path dependence. Q J Polit Sci 1:87–115
Setterfield M (1998) Rapid growth and relative decline: modelling macroeconomic dynamics with hysteresis. Macmillan, London.
Setterfield M (2009) Path dependency, hysteresis and macrodynamics. In: Arestis P, Sawyer M (eds) Path dependency and macroeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 37–79
Sydow J, Schrëyogg G, Koch J (2009) Organisational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad Manage Rev 34(4):689–709
Vergne J, Durand R (2010) The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: conceptual clarification, testability issues and methodological implications. J Manage Stud 47(4):736–759
Witt U (2003) The evolving economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Martin, R. (2014). Path Dependence and the Spatial Economy: A Key Concept in Retrospect and Prospect. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23429-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23430-9
eBook Packages: Business and Economics