Skip to main content

The Measurement of Regional Growth and Wellbeing

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Regional Science

Abstract

Our understanding of people’s well-being was, until very recently, inferred from observable objective indicators such as their income and education. These measures were then aggregated to generate an average that characterized the city or region. With the growing availability of sample survey data, we now have at our disposal an increasing range of subjective measures of well-being that capture quality of life assessments made by individuals themselves. It is these internal measures of subjective well-being from microdata that are now being widely used throughout the social sciences to study what we call well-being or “happiness.”

Contemporary interest in subjective measures of well-being stems from a wish to supplement market-based criteria such as GDP per capita with other more direct measures of societal well-being. Subjective measures are particularly useful in areas where the distribution of outcomes is not easily identified using other, especially market, criteria. The effect of investment in public infrastructure or the provision of green space or in fostering community networks or in redeveloping neighborhoods can be captured in responses to questions on well-being, preferably over time. These subjective measures, which have been shown to be highly correlated with clinical and other assessments of well-being, are likely to be of particular interest in regional science because of the way changes to places result from, or generate, a range of positive or negative externalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews FM, Withey SB (1976) Social indicators of wellbeing: American’s perceptions of life quality. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballas D, Tranmer M (2012) Happy people or happy places? A multilevel modeling approach to the analysis of happiness and wellbeing. Int Reg Sci Rev 35(1):70–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell AM (2002) Locally interdependent preferences in a general equilibrium environment. J Econ Behav & Organ 47(3):309–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry BJL, Okulicz-Kozaryn A (2011) An urban–rural happiness gradient. Urban Geogr 32(6):871–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonini AN (2008) Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Soc Indic Res 87(2):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (1981) The sense of wellbeing in America. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril H (1965) The pattern of human concerns. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire PC, Monastiriotis V, Sheppard S (2003) Income inequality and residential segregation: labour market sorting and the demand for positional goods. In: Martin R, Morrison PS (eds) Geographies of labour market inequality. Routledge, London, pp 83–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WAV, Fossett M (2008) Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(11):4109–4114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WAV, Morrison PS (2012) Socio-spatial mobility and residential sorting: evidence from a large-scale survey. Urban Stud 49(15):3253–3270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WAV, Deurloo MC, Dieleman FM (1984) Housing consumption and residential mobility. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 74(1):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A, Etilé F, Postel-Vinay F, Senik C, Van der Straeten K (2005) Heterogeneity in reported wellbeing: evidence from twelve European countries. The Econ J 115:C118–C132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AE, Frijters P, Shields MA (2008) Relative income happiness, and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J Econ Lit 46(1):95–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P, Peasgood T, White D (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the literature on the factors associated with subjective wellbeing. J Econ Psychol 29(1):94–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duesenberry JS (1949) Income, saving and the theory of consumer behaviour. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf SN (1996) A theory of persistent income inequality. J Econ Growth 1:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin R (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In: David PA, Melvin WB (eds) Nations and households in economic growth. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp 89–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (2011) Happiness, growth and the life cycle. Oxford University Press for IZA, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA, Zimmermann AC (2008) Life satisfaction and economic conditions in East and West Germany pre- and post-unification. In Working paper SOEP (DIW, Berlin, Germany)

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA, Angelescu L, Zweig JS (2011) The impact of modern economic growth on urban–rural differences in subjective wellbeing. World Dev 39(12):2187–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Frijters P (2004) How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Econ J 114(497):641–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH (2005) Positional externalities cause large and preventable welfare losses. Am Econ Rev 95(2):137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect human well being. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham C (2011) The pursuit of happiness: an economy of wellbeing. Brookings Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell JF (2008) Life satisfaction and the quality of development. Working paper 14507, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R, Rabier JR (1986) Aspirations adapt to situations – but why are the Belgians so much happier than the French? In: Andrews FM (ed) Research on the quality of life. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp 1–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Krueger AB (2006) Developments in the measurement of subjective wellbeing. J Econ Perspect 20(1):3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marans RW, Stimson RJ (2011) Investigating quality of urban life: theory, methods, and empirical research. Springer, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot M (2005) The status syndrome: how social standing affects our health and longevity. Owl Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchante AJ, Ortega B (2006) Quality of life and economic convergence across Spanish regions, 1980–2001. Region Stud 40(5):471–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison PS (2011) Local expressions of subjective wellbeing: the New Zealand experience. Region Stud 45(8):1039–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okulicz-Kozaryn A (2011) Geography of European life satisfaction. Soc Indic Res 101(3):435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald AJ (2003) How much do external factors affect well being? Psychologist March 16(3):140–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittau MG, Zelli R, Gelman A (2010) Economic disparities and life satisfaction in European regions. Soc Indic Res 96(2):339–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roback J (1982) Wages, rents and the quality of life. J Political Econ 90(6):1257–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royuela V, Artis M (2006) Convergency analysis in terms of quality of life in the urban systems of the Barcelona province, 1991–2000. Region Stud 40(5):485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC (1978) Micromotives and macrobehaviour. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark O, Wang YQ (2005) Towards a theory of self-segregation as a response to relative deprivation: steady-state outcomes of social welfare. In: Bruni L, Porta PL (eds) Economics and happiness: framing the analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp 223–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi JP (2009) Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. (The Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (CMEPSP))

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann R (2009) Unemployment, social capital, and subjective wellbeing. J Happiness Stud 10(4):421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip S. Morrison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Morrison, P.S. (2014). The Measurement of Regional Growth and Wellbeing. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23429-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23430-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics