Abstract
If breast density is to be incorporated into breast cancer risk prediction models, the technique used for measurement must be quantitative, accurate, objective and reproducible. We present a semi-automated method that has been used by three independent operators to measure glandular volume from the digitised mammograms of 29 women (116 images). Additionally, one operator used the method on 10 separate occasions on a sample of 24 images. Intra-observer variability was found to be acceptably low, with coefficients of variation ranging from 3.5 – 5.7% depending on mammographic view (intra-class correlation coefficient close to 1 in all cases). However, inter-observer variability was greater with significant differences in glandular volume recorded between observers. This was attributed to the method of breast edge detection. The development of a new automatic breast edge detection algorithm has resolved the issue. The average difference in glandular volume measurement between two independent operators in the cranio-caudal view is -0.89cm3 (95% confidence interval -2.77 – 0.99 cm3) using the new method, compared to 5.99cm3 (95% confidence interval 2.72 – 9.76 cm3) using the old method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gail, M.H., Brinton, L.A., Byar, D.P., Corle, D.K., Green, S.B., Schairer, C., Mulvhill, J.J.: Projecting Individualised Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females who are being Examined Annually. J. Nat. Can. Inst. 81, 1879–1886 (1989)
Claus, E.B., Risch, N., Thompson, W.D.: Autosomal Dominant Inheritance of Early-Onset Breast Cancer: Implications for Risk Prediction. Cancer 73, 643–651 (1994)
Tyrer, J., Duffy, S.W., Cuzick, J.: A Breast Cancer Prediction Model Incorporating Familial and Personal Risk Factors. Stats. Med. 23, 1111–1130 (2004)
Barlow, W.E., White, E., Ballard-Barbash, R., Vacek, P.M., Titus-Ernstoff, L., Carney, P.A., Tice, J.A., Buist, D.S.M., Geller, B.M., Rosenberg, R., Yankaskas, B.C., Kerlikowske, K.: Prospective Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for Women Undergoing Screening Mammography. J. Nat. Can. Inst. 98, 1204–1212 (2006)
Hufton, A.P., Astley, S.M., Marchant, T.E., Patel, H.G.: A Method for the Quantification of Dense Breast Tissue from Digitised Mammograms. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Patel, H.G., Astley, S.M., Hufton, A.P., Harvie, M., Hagan, K., Marchant, T.E., Hillier, V., Howell, A.: Automated Breast Tissue Measurement of Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 131–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Diffey, J., Hufton, A., Astley, S.: A New Stepwedge for the Volumetric Measurement of Mammographic Density. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 1–9. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Diffey, J., Hufton, A., Beeston, C., Marchant, T., Astley, S.: Quantifying Breast Thickness for Density Measurement. In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) IWDM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5116, pp. 651–658. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Verow, R. et al. (2010). Inter and Intra Observer Variability in a Semi-automatic Method for Measuring Volumetric Breast Density . In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_78
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)