Skip to main content

Conservation in Dynamical Cores: What, How and Why?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Numerical Techniques for Global Atmospheric Models

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering ((LNCSE,volume 80))

Abstract

The conservation properties of the continuous, adiabatic and frictionless equations governing atmospheric flow are summarized. It is often considered desirable for atmospheric models to possess analogues of these conservation properties; some of the techniques for obtaining such analogues are noted. However, there is no widespread agreement in the literature on which conservation properties are most important and why. Here we suggest some ways of thinking about these questions, taking into account the atmospheric flow regimes that global numerical models are intended to represent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arakawa A (1966) Computational design for long-term numerical integration of the equations of fluid motion: Two-dimensional incompressible flow. J Comput Phys 1:119–143

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Arakawa A, Lamb VR (1977) Computational design and the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. Methods in Computational Physics 17:172–265

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gassmann A, Herzog HJ (2008) Towards a consistent numerical compressible non-hydrostatic model using generalized Hamiltonian tools. Q J R Meteorol Soc 134:1597–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grinstein FF, Margolin LG, Rider WJ (eds) (2007) Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing turbulent fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson DR, Lenzen AJ, Zapotocny TH, Schaak TK (2000) Numerical uncertainties in the simulation of reversible isentropic processes and entropy conservation. J Clim 13:3860–3884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koshyk JN, Boer GJ (1995) Parametrization of dynamical subgrid-scale processes in a spectral gcm. J Atmos Sci 52:965–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peixoto JP, Oort M (1992) Physics of Climate. American Institute of Physics

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sadourny R (1975) The dynamics of finite-difference models of the shallow-water equations. J Atmos Sci 32:680–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadourny R, Basdevant C (1985) Parameterization of subgrid scale barotropic and baroclinic eddies in quasi-geostrophic models: Anticipated potential vorticity method. J Atmos Sci 42:1353–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salmon R (2004) Poisson-bracket approach to the construction of energy- and potential-enstrophy-conserving algorithms for the shallow-water equations. J Atmos Sci 61:2016–2036

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Shutts G (2005) A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for use in ensemble prediction systems. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 131:3079–3102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simmons AJ, Burridge DM (1981) An energy and angular-momentum conserving vertical finite-difference scheme and hybrid vertical coordinates. Mon Wea Rev 109(4):758–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. the basic experiment. Mon Wea Rev 101:99–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thuburn J (2008) Some conservation issues for the dynamical cores of NWP and climate models. J Comput Phys 227:3715 – 3730

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Thuburn J, Tan DGH (1997) A parameterization of mixdown time for atmospheric chemicals. J Geophys Res 102:13,037–13,049

    Google Scholar 

  16. White AA, Hoskins BJ, Roulstone I, Staniforth A (2005) Consistent approximate models of the global atmosphere: Shallow, deep, hydrostatic, quasi-hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 131:2081–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Williamson DL, Olson J (1994) Climate simulations with a semi-Lagrangian version of the NCAR Community Climate Model. Mon Wea Rev 122(7):1594–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Thuburn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thuburn, J. (2011). Conservation in Dynamical Cores: What, How and Why?. In: Lauritzen, P., Jablonowski, C., Taylor, M., Nair, R. (eds) Numerical Techniques for Global Atmospheric Models. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 80. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11640-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics