Skip to main content

Deployment: Regulations and Steps for Commercialization

  • Chapter
Transgenic Crop Plants

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) crops produced by genetic engineering continue to increase in production worldwide. In 2007, 23 countries produced 282.3 million acres of GM crops, up 30.3 million acres since 2006 [International Service of AgriBiotech Applications (ISAAA)]. The US ranks first in GM crop production, followed by Argentina, Brazil and Canada, in that order. The potential for economic and social gain from the production of GM crops is generally greater in developing countries/economies, since there is usually a higher incidence of disease/pests and larger potential for yield increase (Abdalla et al. 2003; Qaim 2005). According to Nossal et al. (2008), GM crop production in 2007 increased by 20% in countries with emerging economies versus 6% in developed countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAFC, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (1994) Assessment criteria for determining environmental safety of plants with novel traits, regulatory directive 94-08. AAFC, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdalla A, Berry P, Connell P, Tran Q, Buetre B (2003) Agricultural biotechnology: potential for use in developing countries. ABARE eReport, vol 03.17. Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • APHIS (2000) Agriculture Risk Protection Act of 2000. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/pdf/AgRiskProtAct2000.pdf

  • Barrett K, Abergel E (2000) Genetically engineered crops. Breeding familiarity: environmental risk assessment for genetically engineered crops in Canada. Sci Public Policy 27:2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belson N (2000) US regulation of agricultural biotechnology: an overview. AgBioForum 3:268–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg P, Baltimore D, Brenner S, Roblin RO, Singer MF (1981) Summary statement of the Asilomar Conference on recombinant DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:1981–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale PJ (2002) The environmental impact of genetically modified (GM) crops: a review. J Agr Sci 138:245–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice Canada (1983) Feeds Act. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/ShowFullDoc/cs/F-9///en

  • Department of Justice Canada (1985a) Food and Drugs Act. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/ShowFul-lDoc/cs/F-27///en

  • Department of Justice Canada (1985b) Seeds Act. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/ShowFullDoc/cs/S-8///en

  • Department of Justice Canada (1999) Canadian Environmental Protection Act. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-15.31/text.html

  • Haniotis T (2000) Regulating agri-food production in the US and the EU. AgBioForum 3:84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, van Montagu M, Shell J (1983) Expression of chimaeric genes transferred into plant cells using a Ti-plasmid-derived vector. Nature 303:209–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications). http://www.isaaa.org

  • Kalaitzandonakes N (2000) Why does biotech regulation differ so much between the EU and the US? AgBioForum 3:75–76

    Google Scholar 

  • McHughen A, Smyth S (2008) US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars. Plant Biotechnol J 6:2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris S (2006) EU biotech crop regulations and environmental risk: a case of the emperor's new clothes? Trends Biotechnol 25(1):2–6, Jan 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NIH (US National Institute of Health) (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government. Managing the process. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NIH (National Institutes of Health) (1976) Recombinant DNA research. Guidelines. Federal Register 41, 27902, 27911–27943

    Google Scholar 

  • NIH (1978) Guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules. Fed Regist 43 (60):108

    Google Scholar 

  • Nossal K, Abdalla A, Curtotti R, Tran QT, Brown A (2008) GM crops in emerging economies. Research Report 08.3. www.abare.gov.au

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1982) Biotechnology, international trends and perspectives. OECD, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal of the European Communities (2001) Directive 2001/18/ec of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:106:0001:0038:EN:PDF

  • Official Journal of the European Communities (2003) Directive 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://www.gmo-compass.org/pdf/law/1829-2003.pdf

  • Qaim M (2005) Agricultural biotechnology adoption in developing countries. Am J Agr Econ 87:1317–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramjouè C (2007) The transatlantic rift in genetically modified food policy. J Agr Environ Ethics 20:419–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schell J, van Montagu M, Holsters M, Zambryski P, Joos H, Inze D, Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, de Block M, Caplan A, Dhaese P, Van Haute E, Hernalsteens JP, de Greve H, Leemans J, Deblaere R, Willmitzer L, Schroder J, Otten L (1983) Ti plasmids as experimental gene vectors for plants. Advances in gene technology: molecular genetics of plants and animals. Miami Winter Symp 20:191–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth S, McHughen A (2008) Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops. Plant Biotechnol J 6:213–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly D. Chenault Chamberlin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chamberlin, K.D.C. (2010). Deployment: Regulations and Steps for Commercialization. In: Kole, C., Michler, C.H., Abbott, A.G., Hall, T.C. (eds) Transgenic Crop Plants. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04812-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics