Skip to main content

An Effectiveness Measure for Ambiguous and Underspecified Queries

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5766))

Abstract

Building upon simple models of user needs and behavior, we propose a new measure of novelty and diversity for information retrieval evaluation. We combine ideas from three recently proposed effectiveness measures in an attempt to achieve a balance between the complexity of genuine users needs and the simplicity required for feasible evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moffat, A., Zobel, J.: Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 27, 1–27 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke, C.L., Kolla, M., Cormack, G.V., Vechtomova, O., Ashkann, A., Büttcher, S., MacKinnon, I.: Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 659–666 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal, R., Gollapudi, S., Halverson, A., Ieong, S.: Diversifying search results. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 5–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spärck Jones, K., Robertson, S.E., Sanderson, M.: Ambiguous requests: Implications for retrieval tests. SIGIR Forum 41(2), 8–17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, J., Demner-Fushman, D.: Will pyramids built of nuggets topple over? In: Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, 383–390 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nenkova, A., Passonneau, R., McKeown, K.: The pyramid method: Incorporating human content selection variation in summarization evaluation. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing 4(2) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 20(4), 422–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, H., Karger, D.R.: Less is more: Probabilistic models for retrieving fewer relevant documents. In: 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 429–436 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clarke, C.L.A., Kolla, M., Vechtomova, O. (2009). An Effectiveness Measure for Ambiguous and Underspecified Queries . In: Azzopardi, L., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval Theory. ICTIR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5766. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04417-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04417-5_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04416-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04417-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics