Abstract
I discuss the continuum of approaches that exist when studying sexual or natural selection in the wild and the laboratory. These range from behavioural observations in the laboratory, via experimental manipulations of particular traits or environments, to phenomenological studies in nature. I focus on the study of body size and related life history traits, particularly drawing from our own studies on dung flies as examples. For any given species or phenomenon, ideally all types of studies should be integrated to obtain a complete picture of the evolution of particular traits in terms of mechanisms and function, proximate and ultimate explanations. I particularly advocate the use of standardised selection measures, which are well established in the literature but underused, and which I discuss in the chapter as practical guidance for the general reader. Utilisation of such measures even in experimental, laboratory studies of behavioural mechanisms, which is often possible but rarely done, would greatly facilitate any future meta-analyses of particular traits, species and evolutionary phenomena.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abt G, Reyer H-U (1993) Mate choice and fitness in a hybrid frog – Rana esculenta females prefer Rana lessonae males over their own. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:221-228
Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818-820
Andersson S (1989) Sexual selection and cues for female choice in leks of Jacksons’s widowbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:403-410
Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984a) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719
Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984b) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38:720-734
Badyaev AV, Hill GE, Stoehr AM, Nolan PM, McGraw KJ (2000) The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the house finch. II. Population divergence in relation to local selection. Evolution 54:2134-2144
Björklund M, Lindén M (1993) Sexual size dimorphism in the great tit (Parus major) in relation to history and current selection. J Evol Biol 6:397-415
Blanckenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q Rev Biol 75:385-407
Blanckenhorn WU (2005) Behavioral causes and consequences of sexual size dimorphism. Ethology 111:977-1016
Blanckenhorn WU (2007) Case studies of the differential-equilibrium hypothesis of sexual size dimorphism in dung flies. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds) Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 106-114
Blanckenhorn WU, Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ (1995) Time and energy constraints and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism: to eat or to mate? Evol Ecol 9:369-381
Blanckenhorn WU, Morf C, Mühlhäuser C, Reusch T (1999a) Spatiotemporal variation in selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. J Evol Biol 12:563-576
Blanckenhorn WU, Reuter M, Ward PI, Barbour AD (1999b) Correcting for sampling bias in quantitative measures of selection when fitness is discrete. Evolution 53:286-291
Blanckenhorn WU, Mühlhäuser C, Morf C, Reusch T, Reuter M (2000) Female choice, female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dungfly Sepsis cynipsea. Ethology 106:577-593
Blanckenhorn WU, Kraushaar URS, Reim C (2003) Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the yellow dung fly. J Evol Biol 16:903-913
Blanckenhorn WU, Kraushaar URS, Teuschl Y, Reim C (2004) Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the black scavenger fly Sepsis cynipsea. J Evol Biol 17:629-641
Blanckenhorn WU, Birrer M, Meier CM, Reim C, Teuschl Y, Weibel D (2008) Size-dependent mating success at various nutritional states in the yellow dung fly. Ethology 114:752-759
Blows MW (2007) A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J Evol Biol 20:1-8
Bouteiller-Reuter C, Perrin N (2005) Sex-specific selective pressures on body mass in the greater white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula. J Evol Biol 18:290-300
Brodie ED III, Janzen FJ (1996) On the assignment of fitness values in statistical analyses of selection. Evolution 50:437-442
Brodie ED III, Moore AJ, Janzen FJ (1995) Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 10:313-318
Bumpus HC (1899) The elimination of the unfit as illustrated by the introduced sparrow, Passer domesticus. Biol Lect Woods Hole Marine Biol Lab 6:209-226
Clutton-Brock TH (1988) Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Cox RM, Calsbeek R (2009) Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am Nat 173:176-187
Crow JF (1958) Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum Biol 30:1-13
Darwin C (1859) The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London
Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London
Endler JA (1986) Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Fairbairn DJ, Preziosi RF (1994) Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. Am Nat 144:101-118
Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Harlow
Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA (2002) Nuptial gifts and the evolution of male body size. Evolution 56:590-596
Freeman S, Herron JC (2007) Evolutionary Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River/NJ
Grant BR (1985) Selection on bill characters in a population of Darwin’s finches: Geospiza conirostris on Isla Genovesa, Galapagos. Evolution 39:523-532
Grant PR, Grant BR (1995) Predicting microevolutionary responses to directional selection on heritable variation. Evolution 49:241-251
Harvey AW (1990) Sexual differences in contemporary selection acting on size in the hermit crab Clibanarius digueti. Am Nat 136:292-304
Hunt J, Breuker CJ, Sadowski JA, Moore AJ (2009) Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. J Evol Biol 22:13-26
Istock CA (1981) Natural selection and life history variation: theory plus lessons from a mosquito. In: Denno RF, Dingle H (eds) Insect Life History Patterns: Habitat and Geographic Variation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 113-126
Jann P, Blanckenhorn WU, Ward PI (2000) Temporal and microspatial variation in the intensities of natural and sexual selection in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. J Evol Biol 13:927-938
Janzen FJ, Stern HS (1998) Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52:1564-1571
Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat 157:245-261
Koenig WD, Albano SS (1987) Lifetime reproductive success, selection and the opportunity for selection in the white-tailed skimmer, Plathemis lydia (Odonata: Libellulidae). Evolution 41:22-36
Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226
Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland/MA
Manly BFJ (1985) The Statistics of Natural Selection on Animal Populations. Chapman and Hall, London
Martin OY, Hosken DJ (2003a) The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423:979-982
Martin OY, Hosken DJ (2003b) Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy. Evolution 57:2765-2772
Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344:330-333
Mitchell-Olds T, Shaw RG (1987) Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149-1161
Mousseau TA, Roff DA (1987) Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181-197
Mühlhäuser C, Blanckenhorn WU (2002) The costs of avoiding matings in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav Ecol 13:359-365
Olsson M, Shine R, Wapstra E, Ujvari B, Madsen T (2002) Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: the roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection. Evolution 56:1538-1542
Palmer AR (2000) Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:441-480
Phillips PC, Arnold SJ (1989) Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209-1222
Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ (2000) Lifetime selection on adult body size and components of body size in a waterstrider: opposing selection and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism. Evolution 54:558-566
Price TD (1984) Sexual selection on body size, territory and plumage variables in a population of Darwin’s Finches. Evolution 38:327-341
Savalli UM, Fox CW (1998) Sexual selection and the fitness consequences of male body size in the seed beetle Stator limbatus. Anim Behav 55:473-483
Savalli UM, Fox CW (1999) The effect of male size, age, and mating behavior on sexual selection in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Ethol Ecol Evol 11:49-60
Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Teuschl Y, Reim C, Blanckenhorn WU (2010) No size-dependent reproductive costs in black scavenger fly (Sepsis cynipsea) males. Behav Ecol 21:85-90
Ward PI (1988) Sexual selection, natural selection, and body size in Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda). Am Nat 131:348-359
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blankenhorn, W. (2010). The quantitative study of sexual and natural selection in the wild and in the laboratory. In: Kappeler, P. (eds) Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02624-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02624-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02623-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02624-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)