Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 22))

Abstract

Many developments in the field of image processing and analysis have been motivated and driven by applications from microscopy. Unfortunately, today hardly any general applicable set of image processing methods exist to support biomedical experts with a fully or partially automated analysis of micrographs to support and strengthen his experiments. Hence, currently much image analysis and interpretation in this field has to be done manually. Otherwise, a background in image processing is needed to adopt available image analysis tools to the desired task, or to write scripts in image-processing toolboxes.

Thus, using cervical nuclei as a first example, a novel image processing scheme is suggested to bridge the so-called “semantical gap” between the analytical question of the biomedical experts on one side and the required set of image processing procedures on the other. Within this approach, the biomedical expert interactively annotates the background and foreground pixels (nuclei) on a small subset of micrographs of cervical cells. Using this information, the image processing system can now automatically find the most optimal classifier to separate these two sets of pixels in color space. Within this approach machine-learning algorithms, namely K-Nearest Neighbor, KStar, Gaussian Mixture Models, KMeans and Expectation-Maximation have been used and evaluated for the task to separate fore- and background pixels in the color space to yield an automated segmentation approach for cervical nuclei. Thus, the suggested approach is able to “learn” the required segmentation task from the biomedical experts by interactively training the system on a small subset of images. After the self-organization and optimization procedure, the system is capable to apply the learned analysis mechanisms to other micrographs of cervical cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Phung SL, Bouzerdoum A, Chai D. (2005) Skin Segmentation Using Color Pixel Classification: Analysis and Comparison. IEEE Trans Pattern Analyis and Machine Intelligence 27:148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vandenbroucke N, Macaire L, Postaire JG. (2003) Color image segmentation by pixel classification in an adapted hybrid color space: application to soccer image analysis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 90:190–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang Z, Wang ZF. (2007) Bark Classification Using RBPNN in Different Color Space. Neural Inf. Processing Letters & Reviews 11:7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lezoray O, Cardot H. (2002) Cooperation of Color Pixel Classification Schemes and Color Watershed: A Study for Microscopic Images. IEEE Trans.Image Processing 11:783–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charrier C, Lebrun G, Lezoray O. (2007) Evidential segmentation of microscopic color images with pixel classification posterior probabilities. J. of Multimedia 2:57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergen T, Steckhan D, Wittenberg T, Zerfass T. (2008) Segmentation of leukocytes and erythrocytes in blood smear images. Proc’s EMBC 2008,:in print.Vancouver, Canada, 20.–24.8.2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cleary JG, Trigg LE. (1995) K*: An instance-based learner using an entropic distance measure. Proc’s 12th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning:108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dempster AP, et al. (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Statistical Soc. 39:1–38.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Wittenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wittenberg, T., Becher, F., Hensel, M., Steckhan, D.G. (2009). Image Segmentation of Cell Nuclei based on Classification in the Color Space. In: Vander Sloten, J., Verdonck, P., Nyssen, M., Haueisen, J. (eds) 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_146

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_146

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89207-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89208-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics