Abstract
Three dimensional ultrasound volume datasets can be computed by volume reconstruction based on a static scan conversion using matrix array transducers or dynamic volume reconstruction based on the position and angle data of several single ultrasound data slices of a tracked linear array ultrasound transducer. The fact that medical ultrasound data suffers from blur caused by the volume expansion of the pressure field of the mechanical wave leads to signal deterioration that is dependent on the used excitation pulse and focusing of the ultrasonic wave. These sources can be examined in order to improve the overall system resolution for 3D ultrasound reconstructions of freehand tracked measurements by compensating it using deconvolution techniques or multicode compounding during the volume reconstruction step. In contrast to the static volume reconstruction of matrix array volume data freehand recorded data slices have no predictable positions and angles so that a volume reconstruction with regard to a blur compensation is a complex computation. Looking at the ultrasound transfer function we can focus on the simulation and measurement of the “point spread function” especially in the lateral and elevational direction. To understand its effects on a 3D reconstruction we compute a simulation of freehand-ultrasound slices based on synthetic phantom structures and given US parameters. Computing a 3D reconstruction of these simulated slices we can optimize the reconstruction algorithm itself to archive better resolution in the volume data sets considering ultrasound parameters like beamforming and the excitation pulses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.A. Jensen, N.B. Svendsen (1992) Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized and excited ultrasound transducers, in IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroeletrics and Frequency Control, 39(2): 262–267
J.A. Jensen (1992) Deconvolution of Ultrasound Images, in Ultrasound Imaging Vol 14, pp 1–15, Academic Press
E.E. Hundt, E.A. Trautenberg, Digital Processing of Ultrasonic Data by Deconvolution, in IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, Vol SU-27, No 5, 1980
W. Vollmann, Resolution Enhancement of Ultrasonic B-Scan Images by Deconvolution, in IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, Vol. SU-29, No. 2, 1982
R. N. Rohling, A. H. Gee, L. Berman (1998) Radial basis function interpolation for 3-D ultrasound
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hewener, H.J., Lemor, R.M. (2009). Deconvolution of freehand 3d ultrasound data using improved reconstruction techniques in consideration of ultrasound point spread functions. In: Vander Sloten, J., Verdonck, P., Nyssen, M., Haueisen, J. (eds) 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_103
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_103
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89207-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89208-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)