Skip to main content

A Comparison of Pseudo-paper and Paper Prototyping Methods for Mobile Evaluations

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008 Workshops (OTM 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5333))

Abstract

The research presented in this paper is part of an ongoing investigation into how best to support meaningful lab-based usability evaluations of mobile technologies. In particular, we report on a comparative study of (a) a standard paper prototype of a mobile application used to perform an early-phase seated (static) usability evaluation, and (b) a pseudo-paper prototype created from the paper prototype used to perform an early-phase,contextually-relevant, mobile usability evaluation. We draw some initial conclusions regarding whether it is worth the added effort of conducting a usability evaluation of a pseudo-paper prototype in a contextually-relevant setting during early-phase user interface development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Virzi, R.A., Sokolov, J.L., Karis, D.: Usability Problem Identification Using Both Low- and High-Fidelity Prototypes. In: Proceedings of SIGHCI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1996), Vancouver, Canada, April 13-18, pp. 236–243 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sefelin, R., Tscheligi, M., Giller, V.: Paper Prototyping - What is it Good For? A Comparison of Paper- and Computer-Based Low-Fidelity Prototyping. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Extended Abstracts (CHI 2003), Ft. Lauderdale, USA, April 5-10, pp. 778–779 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sá, M., Carriço, L.: Low-Fi Prototyping for Mobile Devices. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006), April 22-27, pp. 694–699 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertini, E., Gabrielli, S., Kimani, S.: Appropriating and Assessing Heuristics for Mobile Computing. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Advised Visual Interfaces (AVI 2006), Venezia, Italy, May 23-26, pp. 119–126 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kjeldskov, J., Graham, C., Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Howards, S., Balbo, S., Davies, J.: Evaluating the Usability of a Mobile Guide. The Influence of Location, Participants, and Resources. Behaviour and Information Technology 24(1), 51–65 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kjeldskov, J., Stage, J.: New Techniques for Usability Evaluation of Mobile Systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies (IJHCS) 60(5-6), 599–620 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hendry, D.G., Mackenzie, S., Kurth, A., Spielberg, F., Larkin, J.: Evaluating Paper Prototypes on the Street. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Extended Abstracts (CHI 2005), Portland, USA, April 2-7, 2005, pp. 1447–1450 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B., Als, B.S., Høegh, R.T.: Is It Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field. In: Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction (MobileHCI 2004), Glasgow, Scotland, September 13 - 16, pp. 61–73 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lumsden, J., Kondratova, I., Langton, N.: Bringing A Construction Site Into The Lab: A Context-Relevant Lab-Based Evaluation Of A Multimodal Mobile Application. In: Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Multimodal and Pervasive Services (MAPS 2006), Lyon, France, June 29, pp. 62–68 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. PacDV, Grocery Store, http://www.pacdv.com/sounds/ambience_sounds.html

  11. Lindgaard, G.: Usability Testing & System Evaluation: A Guide for Designing Useful Computer Systems, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lumsden, J., MacLean, R. (2008). A Comparison of Pseudo-paper and Paper Prototyping Methods for Mobile Evaluations. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008 Workshops. OTM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_77

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_77

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88874-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88875-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics