Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4803))

Abstract

In this work we introduce a novel retrieval language, named OntoPath, for specifying and retrieving relevant ontology fragments. This language is intended to extract customized self-standing ontologies from very large, general-purpose ones. Through OntoPath, users can specify the desired detail level in the concept taxonomies as well as the properties between concepts that are required by the target applications. The syntax and aims of OntoPath resemble XPath’s in that they are simple enough to be handled by non-expert users and they are designed to be included in other XML-based applications (e.g. transformations sheets, semantic annotation of web services, etc.). OntoPath has been implemented on the top of the graph-based database G, for which a Protégé OWL plug-in has been designed to access and retrieve ontology fragments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wang, Y., Haase, P., Bao, J.: A Survey of Formalisms for Modular Ontologies. In: IJCAI 2007. Workshop SWeCKa, Hyderabad, India (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seidenberg, J., Rector, A.: Web ontology segmentation: Analysis, classification and use. In: WWW. Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, Edinburgh (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouquet, P., Giunchiglia, F., van Harmelen, F., Serafini, L., Stuckenschmidt, H.: COWL: Contextualizing Ontologies. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 164–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seaborne, A., Prud’hommeaux, E.: SparQL Query Language for RDF (February 2005) http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  5. Karvounarakis, G., Alexaki, S., Christophides, V., Plexousakis, D., Scholl, M.: RQL: A Declarative Query Language for RDF. In: Proceedings WWW 2002, Hawaii, USA, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jimenez-Ruiz, E., et al.: The Management and Integration of Biomedical Knowledge: Application in the Health-e-Child Project. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4278, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L., et al.: Biostar models of clinical and genomic data for biomedical data warehouse design. Int. Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paraire, J., Berlanga, R., Llidó, D.M.: Resolution of Semantic Queries on a Set of Web Services. In: Andersen, K.V., Debenham, J., Wagner, R. (eds.) DEXA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3588, pp. 385–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borgida, A., Serafini, L.: Distributed description logics: Directed domain correspondences in federated information sources. In: CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE, pp. 36–53 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cuenca-Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: Extracting Modules from Ontologies: A Logic-based Approach. In: OWLED 2007. Proc. of the Third International OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bao, J., Caragea, D., Honavar, V.: Towards collaborative environments for ontology construction and sharing. In: CTS 2006. International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, pp. 99–108. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stuckenschmidt, H., Klein, M.: Structure-based partitioning of large concept hierarchies. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Noy, N., Musen, M.A.: Specifying ontology views by traversal. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 713–725. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bhatt, M., et al.: Semantic completeness in sub-ontology extraction using distributed methods. In: Laganà, A., Gavrilova, M., Kumar, V., Mun, Y., Tan, C.J.K., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3045, pp. 508–517. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Volz, R., Oberle, D., Studer, R.: Implementing Views for Light-weight Web Ontologies. IEEE Database Engineering and Application Symposium (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Berlanga, R.: A View-based Methodology for Collaborative Ontology Engineering: an Approach for Complex Applications (VIMethCOE). In: STICA. 1st International Workshop on Semantic Technologies in Collaborative Applications (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cuenca-Grau, B., et al.: Automatic Partitioning of OWL Ontologies Using E-Connections. In: DL 2005. International Workshop on Description Logics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jiménez, E., Berlanga, R., Sanz, I., Aramburu, M.J., Danger, R.: OntoPathView: A Simple View Definition Language for the Collaborative Development of Ontologies. In: López, B., et al. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Nebot, V., Berlanga, R., Sanz, I., Rios, A.: A Protégé Plug-in-Based System to Manage and Query Large Domain Ontologies. In: 10th Intl. Protégé Conference, Budapest, Hungary (2007), http://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2007/schedule.html

  20. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Christophides, V., Plexousakis, D., Scholl, M., Tourtounis, S.: Optimizing Taxonomic Semantic Web Queries Using Labeling Schemes. Journal of Web Semantics 1(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Agrawal, R., Borgida, A., Jagadish, H.V.: Efficient management of transitive relationships in large data and knowledge bases. In: SIGMOD 1989, ACM Press, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Magkanaraki, A., Tannen, V., Christophides, V., Plexousakis, D.: Viewing the Semantic Web through RVL Lenses. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Means, W.S., Harold, E.R.: XML in a Nutshell A Desktop Quick Reference, January 2001, Chapter 9: XPath: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/xmlnut/chapter/ch09.html

  25. Freund, J., et al.: Health-e-Child: An Integrated Biomedical Platform for Grid-Based Pediatrics. In: Health-Grid Conference, Valencia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert Meersman Zahir Tari

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Berlanga, R., Nebot, V., Sanz, I. (2007). OntoPath: A Language for Retrieving Ontology Fragments. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS. OTM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76846-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76848-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics