Skip to main content

Environmental Elements in Rural Analysis

  • Chapter
Rural Analysis and Management
  • 908 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Bibliography Used

  • M. Abensperg-Traun, T. Wrbka, G. Bieringer, R. Hobbs, F. Deininger, B. Y. Main, N. Milasowszky, N. Sauberer and K. P. Zulka, ‘Ecological restoration in the slipstream of agricultural policy in the old and new world’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 103 (2004), 601–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Ahmad, B. Goldar and S. Misra, ‘Value of arsenic-free drinking water to rural households in Bangladesh’, Journal of Environmental Management 74 (2005), 173–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Aspinall, ‘Modelling land use change with generalized linear models–a multi-model analysis of change between 1860 and 2000 in Gallatin Valley, Montana’, Journal of Environmental Management 72 (2004), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Balmford (and 18 co-authors) ‘Economic reasons for conserving wild nature’. Science (2002), vol 297, no. 5583, pp. 950–953.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • B. P. Bhatt and M. S. Sachan, ‘Firewood consumption along an altitudinal gradient in mountain villages of India’, Biomass and Bioenergy 27 (2004), 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Blanckaert, R. L. Swennen, M. Paredes Flores, R. Rosas Lopez and R. Lira Saade, ‘Floristic composition, plant uses and management practices in homegardens of San Rafael Coxcatlan, Valley of Tehuacan-Cuicatlan, Mexico’, Journal of Arid Environments 57 (2004), 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Bryant, ‘Natural Hazards’, Cambridge University Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Buller, ‘Where the wild things are: the evolving iconography of rural fauna’, Journal of Rural Studies 20 (2004), 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Chen and P. A. White, ‘The mutagenic hazards of aquatic sediments: a review’, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 567 (2004), 151–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J. Clark, ‘Forest policy for sustainable commodity wood production: an examination drawing on the Australian experience’, Ecological Economics 50 (2004), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Cohen, K. D. Shepherd and M. G. Walsh, ‘Empirical reformulation of the universal soil loss equation for erosion risk assessment in a tropical watershed’, Geoderma 124 (2005), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. T. Coomes, B. L. Barham and Y. Takasaki, ‘Targeting conservation-development initiatives in tropical forests: insights from analyses of rain forest use and economic reliance among Amazonian peasants’, Ecological Economics 51 (2004), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Dallas, B. Scheffe and G. Ho, ‘Reedbeds for greywater treatment–case study in Santa Elena-Monteverde, Costa Rica, Central America’, Ecological Engineering 23 (2004), 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Daniel and E. Lecamp, ‘Distribution of three indigenous fern species along a rural-urban gradient in the city of Angers, France’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 3 (2004), 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Deckers, M. Hermy and B. Muys, ‘Factors affecting plant species composition of hedgerows: relative importance and hierarchy’, Acta Oecologica 26 (2004), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Deletic, ‘Sediment transport in urban runoff over grassed areas’, Journal of Hydrology 301 (2005), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.R. Ehrlich and A.H. Ehrlich. ‘Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species’. Random House (1981), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • B. H. M. Elands, T. N. O’Leary, H. W. J. Boerwinkel and K. Freerk Wiersum, ‘Forests as a mirror of rural conditions; local views on the role of forests across Europe’, Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004), 469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Ewan, R. Fish Ewan and J. Burke, ‘Building ecology into the planning continuum: case study of desert land preservation in Phoenix, Arizona (USA)’, Landscape and Urban Planning 68 (2004), 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Fernandez-Juricic, ‘Spatial and temporal analysis of the distribution of forest specialists in an urban-fragmented landscape (Madrid, Spain): Implications for local and regional bird conservation’, Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2004), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Givone, ‘Determination des risques d’inondation, effets de l’amenagement de l’espace’, Comptes Rendus Geosciences 337 (2005), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Hoogstra, H. Schanz and K. Freerk Wiersum, ‘The future of European forestry–between urbanization and rural development’, Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004), 441–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. Iacob and C. Grecea, ‘Public exposure to radon and thoron progeny in Romania’, International Congress Series 1276 (2005), 373–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Jamieson, R. Gordon, D. Joy and H. Lee, ‘Assessing microbial pollution of rural surface waters: A review of current watershed scale modeling approaches’, Agricultural Water Management 70 (2004), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Kaloudis, D. Anastopoulos, C. P. Yialouris, N. A. Lorentzos and A. B. Sideridis, ‘Insect identification expert system for forest protection’, Expert Systems with Applications 28 (2005), 445–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.E. Kotelnikova and T.V.Kotova, ‘Ecological maps as one of the directions of the maps for the social development‘, 60th IFLA General Conference - Conference Proceedings (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. F. Lumsden and A. F. Bennett, ‘Scattered trees in rural landscapes: foraging habitat for insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia’, Biological Conservation 122 (2005), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Mancini, S. Caimi, S. Ciardullo, M. Zeiner, P. Bottoni, L. Tancioni, S. Cautadella and S. Caroli, ‘A pilot study on the contents of selected pollutants in fish from the Tiber River (Rome)’, Microchemical Journal 79 (2005), 171–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Martin-Dominguez, M. T. Alarcon-Herrera, I. R. Martin-Dominguez and A. Gonzalez-Herrera, ‘Efficiency in the disinfection of water for human consumption in rural communities using solar radiation’, Solar Energy 78 (2005), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Nickson, J. M. McArthur, B. Shrestha, T. O. Kyaw-Myint and D. Lowry, ‘Arsenic and other drinking water quality issues, Muzaffargarh District, Pakistan’, Applied Geochemistry 20 (2005), 55–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D. Oguz, ‘Remaining tree species from the indigenous vegetation of Ankara, Turkey’, Landscape and Urban Planning 68 (2004), 371–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. K. Paul, ‘Arsenic contamination awareness among the rural residents in Bangladesh’, Social Science & Medicine 59 (2004), 1741–1755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. S.-H. Peh, J. d. Jong, N. S. Sodhi, S. L.-H. Lim and C. A.-M. Yap, ‘Lowland rainforest avifauna and human disturbance: persistence of primary forest birds in selectively logged forests and mixed-rural habitats of southern Peninsular Malaysia’, Biological Conservation 123 (2005), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Ramessur, ‘Statistical comparison and correlation of zinc and lead in estuarine sediments along the western coast of Mauritius’, Environment International 30 (2004), 1039–1044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • B. D. Richter, J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell and D. P. Braun, ‘A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems’, Conservation Biology 10 (1996), 1163–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. J. Rooklidge, E. R. Burns and J. P. Bolte, ‘Modeling antimicrobial contaminant removal in slow sand filtration’, Water Research 39 (2005), 331–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • K. Saarinen, A. Valtonen, J. Jantunen and S. Saarnio, ‘Butterflies and diurnal moths along road verges: Does road type affect diversity and abundance?’ Biological Conservation 123 (2005), 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Soderlund and T. Rosswall, ‘The Natural Environment and the Biogeochemical Cycles’ (ed. Hutzinger, O.) 61–81 (1982), Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. S. Sodhi, L. P. Koh, D. M. Prawiradilaga, Darjono, I. Tinulele, D. D. Putra and T. H. Tong Tan, ‘Land use and conservation value for forest birds in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia)’, Biological Conservation 122 (2005), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Solis, ‘Water as rural heritage: reworking modernity through resource conflict in Edwards County, Kansas’, Journal of Rural Studies 21 (2005), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. I. Tariq, S. Afzal and I. Hussain, ‘Pesticides in shallow groundwater of Bahawalnagar, Muzafargarh, D.G. Khan and Rajan Pur districts of Punjab, Pakistan’, Environment International 30 (2004), 471–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L. L. Tieszen, G. G. Tappan and A. Toure, ‘Sequestration of carbon in soil organic matter in Senegal: an overview’, Journal of Arid Environments 59 (2004), 409–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. T. Wakida and D. N. Lerner, ‘Non-agricultural sources of groundwater nitrate: a review and case study’, Water Research 39 (2005), 3–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D. H. Wang and K. E. Medley, ‘Land use model for carbon conservation across a midwestern USA landscape’, Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2004), 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Watanabe, A. Kawata, N. Sudo, M. Sekiyama, T. Inaoka, M. Bae and R. Ohtsuka, ‘Water intake in an Asian population living in arsenic-contaminated area’, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 198 (2004), 272–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J. C. Woersching and A. E. Snyder, ‘Earthquakes in El Salvador: a descriptive study of health concerns in a rural community and the clinical implications: Part III-mental health and psychosocial effects’, Disaster Management & Response 2 (2004), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. H. Wong and C. Yu, ‘Study of green areas and urban heat island in a tropical city’, Habitat International 29 (2005), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Zak, M. Cabido and J. G. Hodgson, ‘Do subtropical seasonal forests in the Gran Chaco, Argentina, have a future?’ Biological Conservation 120 (2004), 589–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Zhu, L. Zhang, W. Hart, M. Liu and H. Chen, ‘Quality issues in harvested rainwater in arid and semi-arid Loess Plateau of northern China’, Journal of Arid Environments 57 (2004), 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tapiador, F.J. (2008). Environmental Elements in Rural Analysis. In: Rural Analysis and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73343-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics