Skip to main content

Comparing Two Head-Mounted Displays in Ultrasound Scanning

  • Conference paper
Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques (HCI 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4551))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2512 Accesses

Abstract

Head-mounted displays have been tested in various medical fields. According to some results, using a head-mounted display makes medical operations faster, more effective and accurate than using a conventional table display. In this study we aimed to examine midwives experiences of using a head-mounted display during an ultrasound scan. Our preliminary results indicate that a head-mounted display in an ultrasound scan could work better than the conventional method which is still in common use. We also noticed that the use of a monocular head-mounted display was more comfortable than a see-through display.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Howarth, P.A.: Virtual Reality: an occupational health hazard of the future? RCN Occupational Health Nurses Forum. Working for Health. April 1994 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Letterie, G.S.: How virtual reality may enhance training in obstetrics and gynecology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187, 37–40 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, B., Naluai-Cecchini, A.: Use of a See-Through Head-Worn Display of Patient Monitoring Data to Enhance Anaesthesiologists’ Response to Abnormal Clinical Events. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenthal, M., State, A., Lee, J., Hirota, G., Jeremy Ackerman, J., Keller, K., Etta, D., Pisano, E.D., Jiroutek, M., Muller, K., Fuchs, H.: Augmented reality guidance for needle biopsies: An initial, randomized, controlled trial in phantoms. Medical Image Analysis, pp. 313–320 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reisman, M., Gray, W.A., Ormerod, D.F., Hyde, J.P.: Use of a Head-Mounted Confluent Display of Fluoroscopic and Echocardiographic Images to Enhance Operator Feedback during Catheter-Deployed Closures of Cardiac Septal Defects. In: Proc. of the 10th Annual Medicine Meets Virtual Reality Conference. Newport Beach, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Satava, R.M.: Emerging medical applications of virtual reality: A surgeon’s perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, pp. 281–288 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Satava, R.M., Jones, S.B.: Current and Future Applications of Virtual Reality for Medicine. In: Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 86, pp. 484–489 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shuhaiber, J.H.: Augmented Reality in Surgery. Archives of Surgery 139, 170–174 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Linda, S., Lee, L.S., Carr-Locke, D.L., Ookubo, R., John, R., Saltzman, J.R.: Randomized trial of a video headset vs. a conventional video monitor during colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 61(2), 301–306 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Häkkinen, J., Takatalo, J., Havukumpu, J., Komulainen, J., Särkelä, H., Nyman, G.: Simulator sickness symptoms caused by a visual search task in a monocular virtual display. In: Proc. the 11th International Display Workshops (IDW 2004) December 8-10, Niigata, Japan (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peli, E.: The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Research 38, 2053–2066 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rushton, S., Mon-Williams, M., Wann, J.P: Binocular vision in a bi-ocular world. New-generation head-mounted displays avoid causing visual deficit. Displays issue 4, 255–260 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Julie A. Jacko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Havukumpu, J., Häkkinen, J., Grönroos, E., Vähäkangas, P., Nyman, G. (2007). Comparing Two Head-Mounted Displays in Ultrasound Scanning. In: Jacko, J.A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques. HCI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4551. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73107-8_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73107-8_67

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73106-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73107-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics