Abstract
In abstract terms conjoint analysis can be seen as fitting a model to preference information elicited from a group of respondents. That is, conjoint analysis comprises two tasks,
-
(1)
preference data elicitation, and
-
(2)
model fitting to the elicited data.
The model fitting phase is necessary since in general the elicited data tends to be very sparse and can be interpreted meaningfully only in the context of some model, which already encodes general assumptions on the structure of the preferences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
O. Toubia, J. R. Hauser, and D. I. Simester, Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choicebased Conjoint Analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1):116–131, 2004.
R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
J. MatouŠek. Lectures on Discrete Geometry, volume 212 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer Verlag, New York, 2002.
M. L. Fredman. How Good is the Information Theory Bound in Sorting, Theoretical Computer Science, 1:355–361, 1976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giesen, J., Schuberth, E. (2007). The Combinatorial Structure of Polyhedral Choice Based Conjoint Analysis. In: Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., Huber, F. (eds) Conjoint Measurement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71404-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71404-0_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71403-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71404-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)