Skip to main content

DAISY – Universally Designed? Prototyping an Approach to Measuring Universal Design

  • Conference paper
  • 3745 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5105))

Abstract

The DAISY system is currently used as the alternative reading format for print-disabled students in Norway. DAISY is denoted by many as universally designed. This is an important claim, ensuring suited learning opportunities for all students. Thus, to be able to determine this aspect of DAISY is important – as is the case for many information systems. However, methods for evaluating whether a software product is universally designed are lacking. This text builds on previous work investigating the use of DAISY in Norwegian primary- and secondary education, now looking into strategies to evaluate whether DAISY is universally designed. We argue that the term universally designed needs to be more strictly defined in order to become applicable to systems development. Further, we propose two related methods that measure to what degree DAISY is universally designed, using feature analysis methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stephanidis, C., Akoumianakis, D.: Universal design: Towards universal access in the Information Society. In: CHI 2001 Workshop, pp. 499–500 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beecher, V., Paquet, V.: Survey instrument for the universal design of costumer products. Applied Ergonomics 3(36), 363–372 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. DAISY Consortium, http://www.daisy.org

  4. Kawamura, H.: DAISY: a better way to read, a better way to publish – a contribution of libraries serving persons with print disabilities. World Library and Information Congress: IFLA, Seoul (August 20-24, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kerscher, G.: DAISY is. DAISY Consortium (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vanderheiden, M.: Fundamental Principles and Priority Setting for Universal Usability. In: CUU 2000, Arlington, pp. 32–34. ACM, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Masuwa-Morgan, K.R., Burrell, P.: Justification of the need for an ontology for accessibility requirements (Theoretic framework). Interacting with Computers 16, 523–555 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mace, R.: The Center for Universal Design. North Carolina State University, http://www.design.ncsu.edu/

  9. Kitchenham, B.A.: Evaluating software engineering methods and tool, part 6: Identifying and scoring features. Software Engineering Notes 22(2), 16–18 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitchenham, B.A.: Evaluating software engineering methods and tool, part 1: The evaluation context and evaluation methods. Software Engineering Notes 21(1), 11–15 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitchenham, B.A.: Evaluating software engineering methods and tool, part 3: Selecting an appropriate evaluation method - practical issues. Software Engineering Notes 21(4), 9–12 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nes, M.: Appraising and Evaluating the Use of DAISY – For Print Disabled Students in Primary and Secondary Education. Master thesis, UiO, Oslo (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nes, M., Ribu, K.: Appraising and Evaluating the Use of DAISY: A Study of a Reading Aid System. NOKOBIT, Tapir, Trondheim, pp. 263–278 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tollefsen, M., Nes, M.: En sekretær ville løst alle problemer! MediaLT (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huseby Resource Centre, http://www.skolelydbok.no/Avspilling.html

  16. NISO: Specifications for the digital talking book. NISO Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. NISO: Specifications for the digital talking book. NISO Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. NISO Working Papers: Digital talking book standards committee – document navigation features list. NISO Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sourcefourge.net, http://amis.sourcefourge.net/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Klaus Miesenberger Joachim Klaus Wolfgang Zagler Arthur Karshmer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eileen Nes, M., Ribu, K., Tollefsen, M. (2008). DAISY – Universally Designed? Prototyping an Approach to Measuring Universal Design. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70539-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70540-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics