Skip to main content

Miniplates Orientation for Fracture Fixation of the Mandibular Condyle

  • Conference paper
4th Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2008

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 21))

Abstract

Mandibular fractures at the condylar region are normally treated with miniplates made of high stiffness and strength metallic materials. Rigid fixation is important to maintain the position of the two bone segments, thus improving the chances of bone union. Failure to achieve adequate stability will result in malunion or nonunion. In this study, two different orientations of miniplates were used to analyse the primary stability of the fractured site using finite element method. Three dimensional model of a mandible was reconstructed from CT dataset, and a low subcondylar fracture was simulated on the right side of the mandible. A straight 4-hole miniplate was modeled and placed onto the condylar neck axis and fixed with 2 screws, 2mm in diameter and 7mm long on either side of the fracture line. Two different orientations of the miniplates were used for comparison of primary stability and load transfer to the bone — along the condylar neck and below the mandibular notch. Non-linear contact analysis was used and the bone segments were allowed to slide against each other. Results showed that interface micromotion and stress distribution was larger for the miniplate positioned along the condylar neck compared to the one placed below the mandibular notch. For maximum stability, it is advisable to fix the straight miniplate across the fractured segment below the condylar notch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cox T, Kohn M W and Impelluso T (2003) Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures. J Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol 61, pp 481–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi B H, Min Y S, Yi C K et al (2000) A comparison of the stability of miniplate with bicortical screw fixation after sagittal split setback”, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endod, Vol 90, pp 416–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chuong C J, Borotikar B, Schwartz D C et al (2005) Mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol 63, pp 68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crofts C E, Trowbridge A, Aung T M (1990) A comparative in vitro study of fixation of mandibular fractures with paraskeletal clamps or screw plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, Vol 48, pp 461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis E and Dean J (1993) Rigid fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, Vol 76, No 6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis E and Goallo J (1986) Relapse following mandibular advancement with dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation. Oral Maxillofac Surg, Vol 44, pp 509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erkmen E, Simsek B E, Yucel E et al (2005) Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis Part 1: advancement surgeryposterior loading. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol 34, pp 551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimura A, Nagasao T, Kaneko T et al (2006) Adaquate fixation of plates for stability during mandibular reconstruction J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol 34, pp 193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Irish J C, Gullane P J, Gilbert R W et al (1995) Primary mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate: evaluation of 51 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg, Vol 96, pp 93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdul Kadir M R et al (2007) Finite element modelling of primary hip stem stability: The effect of interference fit, Journal of Biomechanics, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 26 November 2007

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foley W L and Beckman T W (1992) In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy. International Journal Adult Orthodont Ortognath Surg, Vol 7, pp 147–151

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerlach V K L and Pape H D (1980) Prinzip und indikation der miniplattenosteosynthese. Dtsch zahnnarztl Z, Vol 35, pp 346

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haug R H (1993) The effects of screw number and length on two methods of tension band plating. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, Vol 51, pp 159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hammer B, Schier J, And Prein J (1997) Osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures: A review of 30 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, Vol 35, pp 288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallas T M, and Fernandez J R (2004) A three-dimensional computer model of the human mandible in two simulated standard trauma situations. J Cranio Maxillo Fac Surg, Vol 32, pp 303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maurer P, Holweg S, Knoll W D et al (2002) Study by finite element method of the mechanical stress of selected biodegradable osteosynthesis screws in sagittal ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, Vol 40, pp 76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y et al (2002) Finite element analysis of the stresses around endosseous implants in various reconstructed mandibular models. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg, Vol 30, pp 170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagasao T, Kobayashi M, Tsuchiya Y et al (2003) Finite element analysis of the stresses around fixtures in various reconstructed mandibular models. Part II (effect of horizontal load). J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg, Vol 31, pp 168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maurer P, Holweg S and Schubert J (1999) Finite-element-analysis of different screw diameters in the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg, Vol 27, pp 365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shetty V, Freymiller E, McBrearty D et al (1996) Functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies: effects of positional screw size and placement configuration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996, Vol 54, pp 601–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pilliar R M (1991) Quantitative evaluation of the effect of movement at a porous coated implant-bone interface, The Bone-Biomaterial Interface, 1st edn, J. E. Davies, ed., University of Toronto Press, pp 380–387

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdul Kadir, M.R., Haron, H., Kamsah, N., Nordin, N. (2008). Miniplates Orientation for Fracture Fixation of the Mandibular Condyle. In: Abu Osman, N.A., Ibrahim, F., Wan Abas, W.A.B., Abdul Rahman, H.S., Ting, HN. (eds) 4th Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2008. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 21. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69139-6_111

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69139-6_111

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69138-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69139-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics