Abstract
At present Laparoscopic surgeries are performed regularly. In practice, no augmented feedback on pinch force is currently available. However,research has proven this to be useful. This research explored the location of a visual feedback signal on pinch force. The reaction time and amount of errors of two different positions of a feedback signal was studied. Firstly, the feedback signal was placed next to the endoscopic view and secondly, it was placed near the tips. Each experiment contained a crossed and an uncrossed tool configuration and was performed with and without view of the tips. It was expected that in the crossed tool conditions problems could occurred as a result of the (non) existence of spatial compatibility between feedback stimulus and response goal. Based on reaction time, it can be concluded that the best position for a visual feedback signal on pinch forces is on top of the instrument tip.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dedemadi, G., Sgourakis, G., Karaliotas, C., Christofides, T., Kouraklis, G., Karaliotas, C.: Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Tension-Free Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernias: A Prospective Randomized Study. Surg. Endosc. 20(7), 1099–1104 (2006)
Moreno-Egea, A., Torralba, J., Morales, G., Fernandez, T., Guzman, P., Hita, G., Girela, E., Corral, M., Campillo, A., Aguayo, J.: Laparoscopic Repair of Secondary Lumbar Hernias: Open Vs. Laparoscopic Surgery. A Prospective, Nonrandomized Study. Cir. Esp. 77(3), 159–162 (2005)
Cuschieri, A.: Whither Minimal Access Surgery: Tribulations and Expectations. A. J. Surg. 169(1), 9–19 (1995)
Stassen, H.G., Dankelman, J., Grimbergen, K.A., Meijer, D.W.: Man-Machine Aspects of Minimally Invasive Surgery. Ann. Rev. in Control. 25, 111–122 (2001)
Westebring-van der Putten, E.P., Goossens, R.H.M., Jakimowicz, J.J., Dankelman, J.: Haptics in Minimally Invasive Surgery - a Review. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Techn. 17(1), 3–16 (2008)
Fischer, H., Trapp, R.: Tactile Optical Sensor for Use in Minimal Invasive Surgery. Stud. Health Tech. and Inf. 29, 623–629 (1996)
Schostek, S., Ho, C.N., Kalanovic, D., Schurr, M.O.: Artificial Tactile Sensing in Minimally Invasive Surgery - a New Technical Approach. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Tech. 15(5), 296–304 (2006)
Ottermo, M.V., Øvstedal, M., Langø, T., Stavdahl, Ø., Yavuz, Y., Johansen, T.A., Mårvik, R.: The Role of Tactile Feedback in Laparoscopic Surgery. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 16(6), 390–400 (2006)
Akinbiyi, T., Okamura, A.M., Yuh, D.D.: Dynamic Augmented Reality for Haptic Display in Robot- Assisted Surgical Systems. In: Proceedings - Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 567–570 (2005)
Anzola, G.P., Bertoloni, G., Buchtel, H.A., Rizzolatti, G.: Spatial Compatibility and Anatomical Factors in Simple and Choice Reaction Time. Neuropsych. 15(2), 295–302 (1977)
Brebner, J., Shephard, M., Cairney, P.: Spatial Relationships and S-R Compatibility. Acta. Psychol (Amst) 36(1), 1–15 (1972)
Brebner, J.: S-R Compatibility and Changes in Rt with Practice. Acta. Psychol. 37(2), 93–106 (1973)
Fitts, P.M., Seeger, C.M.: S-R Compatibility: Spatial Characteristics of Stimulus and Response Codes. J. Exp. Psychol. 46(3), 199–210 (1953)
Nicoletti, R., Anzola, G.P., Luppino, G., Rizzolatti, G., Umilta, C.: Spatial Compatibility Effects on the Same Side of the Body Midline. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8(5), 664–673 (1982)
Nicoletti, R., Umilta, C., Ladavas, E.: Compatibility Due to the Coding of the Relative Position of the Effectors. Acta Psychol (Amst) 57(2), 133–143 (1984)
Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L., Umilta, C.: What Is Crossed in Crossed-Hand Effects? Acta. Psychol. 62, 89–100 (1986)
Wallace, R.J.: Spatiel S-R Compatibility Effects Involving Kinesthetic Cues. J. Exp. Psychol. 93(1), 163–168 (1972)
Wallace, R.J.: S-R Compatibility and the Idea of a Response Code. J. Exp. Psychol. 88(3), 354–360 (1971)
Tlauka, M.: Display-Control Compatibility: The Relationship between Performance and Judgments of Performance. Ergonom. 47(3), 281–295 (2004)
Shore, D.I., Spry, E., Spence, C.: Confusing the Mind by Crossing the Hands. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14(1), 153–163 (2002)
Craig, J.C., Belser, A.N.: The Crossed-Hands Deficit in Tactile Temporal-Order Judgments: The Effect of Training. Percept. 35(11), 1561–1572 (2006)
Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., Driver, J.: Tool-Use Changes Multimodal Spatial Interactions between Vision and Touch in Normal Humans. Cognit. 83(2), 25–34 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Westebring-van der Putten, E.P., Bedaf, S., Winters, M., Goossens, R.H.M. (2008). Differences between Operator Reactions on Positions of Visual Feedback of Haptic Stimuli, in a Crossed or Uncrossed Position of Laparoscopic Tools. In: Ferre, M. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios. EuroHaptics 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5024. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_53
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69056-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69057-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)