Skip to main content

A Direct Method and its Numerical Interpretation in the Determination of the Earth’s Gravity Field from Terrestrial Data

  • Chapter
Dynamic Planet

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 130))

Abstract

In the determination of the gravity field of the Earth the present accuracy requirements represent an important driving impulse for the use of direct and numerical methods in the solution of boundary value problems for partial differential equations. The aim of this paper is to discuss the numerical solution of the linear gravimetric boundary value problem. The approach used follows the principles of Galerkin’s approximations. It is formulated directly for the surface of the Earth as the boundary of the domain of harmonicity. Thus, the accuracy of the gravity field model is only limited by the accuracy of gravimetric data and the data coverage, and by the capability of the computer hardware. The approach offers a certain freedom in the choice of a function basis suitable for representing the gravity potential of the Earth.

Extensive numerical simulations have been done using simulated gravity data derived from the EGM96. Solutions for spherical and more general boundaries have been computed. The solutions also show the oblique derivative effect, usually neglected in geodesy. Moreover, different function bases (such as point masses, reproducing kernels, and Poisson multi-pole wavelets) were used to represent the disturbing potential. The computed global gravity field models are compared with the EGM96 input data in terms of potential values and gravity disturbances at points on the boundary surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bjerhammar A and Svensson L (1983) On the geodetic boundary-value problem for a fixed boundary surface — A satellite approach. Bull. Géod. 57, 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditmar P and Klees R (2002) A method to compute the Earth’s gravity field from SGG/SST data to be acquiered by the GOCE satellite. DUP Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend EW (1989) The geoid and the gravimetric boundary value problem. Report no. 18 from the Dept. of Geodesy. The Royal Inst. Of Technology, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1997) Coerciveness of the linear gravimetric boundary-value problem and a geometrical interpretation. Journal of Geodesy 71, 640–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2000) Direct methods in physical geodesy. In: Schwarz KP (ed.): Geodesy Beyond 2000 — The Challenges of the First Decade. IAG Symposia Vol. 121. Springer, Berlin etc., 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2004) Some topics related to the solution of boundary value problems in geodesy. In: Sanso F (ed.): 5th Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. IAG Symposia Vol. 127. Springer, Berlin etc., 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holschncidcr M, Chambodut A and Mandca M (2003) From global to regional analysis of the magnetic field on the sphere using wavelet frames. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 135, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR and Pope AJ (1972) Uniqueness and existence for the geodetic boundary-value problem using the known surface of the Earth. Bull. Géod. 106, 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine FG et al. (1997) The development of the NASA GSFC and NIMA joint geopotential model. In: Segawa J, Fujimoto H and Okubo S (ed.): Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy. IAG Symposia Vol. 117. 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz H (1980) Geodetic Reference System 1980. Bull. Géod. 54, The Geodesist’s Handbook, 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nečas J (1967) Les méthodes directes en théorie des équations elliptiques. Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rektorys K (1977) Variatiorial problems. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ncsvadba, O., Holota, P., Klees, R. (2007). A Direct Method and its Numerical Interpretation in the Determination of the Earth’s Gravity Field from Terrestrial Data. In: Tregoning, P., Rizos, C. (eds) Dynamic Planet. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49350-1_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics