Skip to main content

A comparative analysis of the pore system in volcanic soils by means of water-retention measurements and image analysis

  • Chapter
Soils of Volcanic Regions in Europe

Conclusions

For the range of volcanic soils investigated, water retention analysis showed that near-saturation and field capacity water contents are more representative of the whole water retention behavior than the most commonly used “wilting point” water content. The Integral Retention Index, IRI, showed a strong relationship with the different environments; the index also showed a clear relationship with the andic properties (as estimated by Alo+1/2Feo; r=0.84), the soils with the lowest Alo+1/2Feo and also a high content in pumice departing from this linear relationship. This is especially relevant because IRI, has a very important physical meaning with respect to ecosystem fertility.

The fraction of the pore space occupied by macroporosity, inferred from the parameter φ 1, was relevant for half the soils investigated; however, it was not possible to detect any correlation with other environmental variables.

The IRI index, related to static hydrological properties, was approximately normally distributed. The distribution of the φ 1 parameters, related to dynamic hydrological properties, was far from normality as it was better approximated by others distributions (i.e. Cauchy) than the log-normal.

Image analysis showed the great complexity of the pore system of these volcanic soils which generally present multimodal pore size distributions.

Comparison between the results from these two techniques suggests that hydrological pore analysis is more suitable to represent pore systems in the size range lower than 500 µm while a much more detailed description is provided by image analysis for pores larger than 500 µm. Specifically, the water retention approach is feasible in describing only simple pore size distribution while fails in describing more complex porous systems with micro ad macropores.

The overall results reported in the present chapter confirm the necessity of different approaches in order to thoroughly understand the soil pore system, especially when complex volcanic material is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya T (1985). Advanced Econometrics. Oxford, Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Armas-Espinel S, Hernández-Moreno JM, Muñoz-Carpena R, Regalado CM (2003). Physical properties of “sorriba” cultivated volcanic soils from Tenerife in relation to diagnostic Andic parameters. Geoderma 117:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoli F, Arnalds O, Buurman P, Garcia-Rodeja E, Hernandez-Moreno J, Oskarsson H, Pinheiro J, Quantin P, Stoops G, Terribile F, van Oort F (2006). Introduction (this book)

    Google Scholar 

  • Basile A, De Mascellis R (1999). Change of hydraulic properties and solute transport parameters. Modelling of transport processes in soils. Int Workshop of EurAgEng’s Field of interest on Soil and Water. Feyen & K. Wiyo (ed), Leuven, pp. 267–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Basile A, Ciollaro G, Coppola A (2003a). Hysteresis in soil water characteristics as a key to interpreting comparisons of laboratory and field measured hydraulic properties. Water Resources Res 39:1355–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile A, Mele G, Terribile F (2003b). Soil hydraulic behaviour of a selected benchmark soil involved in the landslide of Sarno 1998. Geoderma 117:331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Cox DR (1964). An Analysis of Transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 211–243, discussion 244–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Tiao GC (1973). Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruand A, Prost R (1987). Effect of water content on the fabric of a soil material: an experimental approach. J Soil Sci 38:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciollaro G, Romano N (1995). Spatial variability of the hydraulic properties of a volcanic soil. Geoderma 65:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colmet-Daage F, Cucalon F, Delaune M, Gautheyrou J, Gatheyrou M, Moreau B (1967). Cah ORSTOM. Ser Pedol 5:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Colmet-Daage F, Gautheyrou J, Gatheyrou M, de Kimpe C, Sieffermann G, Delaune M, Fusil G (1970). Cah ORSTOM. Ser Pedol 8:113–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola A (2000). Unimodal and bimodal descriptions of hydraulic properties for aggregated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1252–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper NR, Smith H (1981). Applied regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Durner W (1994). Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resources Research 30:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontes J, Goncalves M, Pereira L (2004). Andosols of Terceira, Azores: measurement and significance of soil hydraulic properties. Catena 56:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays W L (1981). Statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmans JW, Overmars B (1986). Presentation and application of an analytical model to describe soil hydraulic properties. Journal of Hydrology 87:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan GW (1998). Mathematical morphology for analysing soil structure from images. Eur J Soil Sci 49:161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz J, Hillel D (1987). A theoretical approach to the areal distribution of soil surface conductivity. Soil Sci 143:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klute A (1986). Water retention: Laboratory methods. In: Klute (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part I, 2nd edn. Agron Monogr, 9, ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 635–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Klute A, Dirksen C (1986). Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. In: Klute (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part I, 2nd edn. Agron Monogr, 9, ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 687–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence GP (1977) Measurement of pore sizes in fine-textured soils: a review of existing techniques. J Soil Sci 28:527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda T, Takenaka H, Warkentin BP (1977). Physical properties of allophane soils. Adv Agr 29:229–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TJ, Holmes JW, Rose CW (1996) Soil Physics, 3rd edn. Cambridge University press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele G, Basile A, Leone AP, Moreau E, Terribile F, Velde B (1999). The study of soil structure by coupling serial sections and 3D image analysis. Modelling of transport processes in soils. Int Workshop of EurAgEng’s Field of inter on Soil and Water. Feyen & Wiyo (ed), Leuven, pp 103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele G, Terribile F, Moreau E (2000). Soil structure characterisation of selected European volcanic soils. Agricoltura Mediterranea 130:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Misono S, Terasawa S, Kishita A, Sudo S (1953). Bull Natl Inst Agric Sci 2:95–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki T (1993). Water flow in soils. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldrup P, Yoshikawa S, Olesen T, Komatsu T, Rolston DE (2003). Gas Diffusivity in Undisturbed Volcanic Ash Soils: Test of Soil-Water-Characteristic-Based Prediction Models. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau E (1997). Etude de la morphologie et de la topologie 2D et 3D d’un sol argileux par analyse d’images. PhD Thesis. Université de Poitiers, France, pp 328

    Google Scholar 

  • Mualem Y (1986). Hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils: Prediction and formulas. In: Klute (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part I, 2nd edn. Agron Monogr, 9, ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 799–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy CP (1985). Faster methods of liquid-phase acetone replacement of water from soils and sediments prior to resin impregnation. Geoderma 35:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanzyo M, Shoji S, Dahlgren R (1993). Physical characteristics of volcanic ash soils. In: Shoji, Nanzio, Dahlgren (eds) Volcanic Ash Soils: Genesis, Properties and Utilization. Development in Soil Science, vol. 17, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 189–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagliai M (1988). Soil porosity aspects. International Agrophysics 4:215–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagliai M, La Marca G, Lucamente G, Genovese L (1984). Effects of zero and conventional tillage on the length and irregularity of elongated pores in a clay loam soil under viticulture. Soil and Tillage Research 4:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel JK, Read CB (1996). Handbook of the normal distribution. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter A, Muñoz-Carpena R, Regalado CM, Vanclooster M, Lambot S (2004). Analysis of alternative measurement strategies for the inverse optimization of the hydraulic properties of a volcanic soil. Journal of Hydrology 295:124–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross PJ, Smettem RJ (1993). Describing soil hydraulic properties with sums of simple functions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:26–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Srivastava M (1990). Regression Analysis. Theory, Methods and Applications. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra J (1982). Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra J (1988). Image analysis and mathematical morphology, vol 2, Theoretical advances. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sills ID, Aylmore LAG, Quirk JP (1973). An analysis of pore size in illitekaolinite mixtures. J Soil Sci 24:480–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smettem KRJ, Kirkby C (1990). Measuring the hydraulic properties of a stable aggregated soil. Journal of Hydrology 117:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten MTh (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten MTh, Nielsen DR (1985). On describing and predicting the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. Annales Geophysicae 3:615–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel T, Cislerova M (1988). On the reliability of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity calculated from the moisture retention curve. Transport in Porous Media 3:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Basile, A., Coppola, A., De Mascellis, R., Mele, G., Terribile, F. (2007). A comparative analysis of the pore system in volcanic soils by means of water-retention measurements and image analysis. In: Arnalds, Ó., Óskarsson, H., Bartoli, F., Buurman, P., Stoops, G., García-Rodeja, E. (eds) Soils of Volcanic Regions in Europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48711-1_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics