Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Radiologische Diagnostik in der Onkologie pp 61–85Cite as

Kolorektales Karzinom

  • Chapter

  • 1441 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur zu Kapitel 4

  • Adachi Y, Mori M, Kuroiwa S, Sugimachi K, Enjoji M (1989) Histopathologic evaluation of survival time in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 42:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, Vogt FM, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG, Lauenstein TC (2003) Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 52:1738–1743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci J (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 184:786–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Beets G, Penninckx F, Schiepers C, Filez L, Mortelmans L, Kerremans R et al. (1994) Clinical value of whole-body positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in recurrent colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 81:1666–1670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beets-Tan RGH (2003) MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin. Colorectal Disease 5:392–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J (2004) Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging — a meta analysis. Radiology 232:773–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CL, Ternet CA, Thorson AG et al. (2003) Response to preoperative chemoradiation in stage II or III rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rect 46:1189–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG et al. (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90:355–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Davies S, Williams GT et al. (2004) Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging? Br J Cancer 91:23–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cady B, Jenkins RL, Steele GD Jr et al. (1998) Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome. Ann Surg 27:566–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CC, Lee RC, Lin JK, Wang LW, Yang SH (2005) How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy? Dis Colon Rectum 48:722–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesura-Corona M, Muzzio PC, Giust G, Zuliani M, Pucciarelli S, Toppan P (2001) Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 26:134–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chintapalli KN, Chopra S, Ghiatas AA, Esola CC, Fields SF, Dodd GD (1999) Diverticulitis versus colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings. Radiology 210:429–435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2001) Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 8507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet 358:1291–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy). JAMA 291:1713–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dukes CE (1932) The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol 35:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop MG, Farrington SM, Carothers AD, Wyllie AH, Sharp L, Burn J et al. (1997) Cancer risk associated with germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutations. Hum Mol Genet 6:105–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eickhoff A, Riemann JF (2002) Health economic aspects colorectal cancer: prevention, treatment and follow-up: what is the most cost-effective approach? Gesund Ökon Qual Manag 7:232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisen GM, Sandler RS, Wurzelmann JI, Ransohoff DF, Talal A (1995) Evaluating risk: a primer for gastroenterologists. Am J Gastroenterol 90:704–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enker WE, Sarlin J (1997) Myths in management of colorectal malignancy. Br J Surg 84:1482–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Even-Sapir E, Parag Y, Lerman H et al. (2004) Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. Radiology 232:815–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feifel G, Hildebrandt U, Langenscheidt P (1995) Etablierte Indikationen der Endosonographie am Rektum und am Kolon. Bildgebung 62(Suppl 2):40–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 210:423–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M, Marinelli T, Genovesi D, Bonomo L (2004) Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography — initial experience. Radiology 231:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeny P, Marks W, Ryan J, Baylen J (1986) Colorectal carcinoma, evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence. Radiology 148:347–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Frentz SM, Summers BS, Summers RM (2006) Current status of CT colonography. Acad Radiol 13:1517–1531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiya M, Maruyama M (1997) Small depressed neoplasms of the large bowel: radiographic visualization and clinical significance. Abdom Imaging 22:325–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gazelle GS, McMahon PM, Scholz FJ (2000) Screening for colorectal cancer. Radiology 215:327–335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goyen M, Ajaj W (2006) MR imaging of the colon: “technique, indications, results and limitations”. Eur J Radiol 10:1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2006) Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. Am J Roentgenol 187:695–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S (2007) Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study. Radiology 242:152

    Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S, Taylor SA (2007) CT colonography: results and limitations. Eur Radiol 61:400–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, Atkin W (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237:893–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D et al. (2006) Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 238:143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D et al. (2005) Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: magnetic resonance colonography in the evaluation of the proximal colon. Endoscopy 37:816–820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield P, Sebag-Montefiori D (2003) The use of radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Scand J Surg 92:65–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haykir R, Karakose S, Karabacakoglu A, Sahin M, Kayacetin E (2006) Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies. World J Gastroenterol 12:2345–2350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoh CK, Schiepers C, Seltzer MA, Gambhir SS, Silverman DH, Czernin J et al. (1997) PET in oncology: will it replace the other modalities? Semin Nucl Med 27:94–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulsmans FJ, Tio TL, Fockens P (1994) Assessment of tumor infiltration dept in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary. Radiology 190:715–720

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iannacone R, Catalano C, Mangiapane F et al. (2005) Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Radiology 237:927–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensch S, Gelder RE van, Venema HW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Laméris JS, Stoker J (2006) Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: results of an inventory among research institutions. Eur Radiol 16:981–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jin KN, Lee JM, Kim SH, Shin KS, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI (2006) The diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction of MDCT colonography for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol 16:2284–2291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, Schmidt SA, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ (2006) CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3 D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16:68–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al. (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klabunde CN, Jones E, Brown ML, Davis WW (2002) Colorectal cancer screening with double-contrast barium enema: a national survey of diagnostic radiologists. Am J Roentgenol 179:1419–1427

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh DM, Brown G, Temple L et al. (2004) Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings — initial observations. Radiology 231:91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komborozos VA, Skretas GJ, Pissiotis CA (2001) The contribution of follow-up programs in the reduction of mortality of rectal cancer recurrences. Dig Surg 18:403–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kung JW, Levine MS, Glick SN, Lakhani P, Rubesin SE, Laufer I (2006) Colorectal cancer: screening double-contrast barium enema examination in average-risk adults older than 50 years. Radiology 240:725–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lane N, Fenoglio CM (1976) The adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the stomach and colon. Gastrointest Radiol 1:111–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1997) Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 386:623–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Herlinger H (2000) Diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms at double-contrast barium enema examination. Radiology 216:11–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luk GD (1993) Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 9:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainenti PP, Cirillo LC, Camera L et al. (2006) Accuracy of single phase contrast enhanced multidetector CT colonography in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol 60:453–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makela JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI (1995) Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 130:1062–1067

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mang T, Graser A, Schima W, Maier A (2007) CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings. Eur Radiol 61:388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marijnen CA, Glimelius B (2002) The role of radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 38:943–952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz AJ, Winawer SJ (1997) Screening and surveillance for colorectal carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 11:579–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez ME, McPherson RS, Annegers JF, Levin B (1996) Association of diet and colorectal adenomatous polyps: dietary fiber, calcium, and total fat. Epidemiology 7:264–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez ME, McPherson RS, Levin B, Glober GA (1997) A case-control study of dietary intake and other lifestyle risk factors for hyperplastic polyps. Gastroenterology 113:423–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy PA, Rubesin SE, Levine MS et al. (1995) Colon cancer: morphology detected with barium enema examination versus histopathologic stage. Radiology 197:683–687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercury Study Group (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 333:779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (1996) Apoptosis and APC in colorectal tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:7950–7954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL (2005) Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 142:635–650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J et al. (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Nat Cancer Inst 93:583–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newland RC, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey L (1995) Survival after curative resection of lymph node negative colorectal carcinoma. A prospective study of 910 patients. Cancer 6:564–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H, Graffner H, Tranberg KG (1995) Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 38:619–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peschaud F, Guenod CA, Benoist S et al. (2005) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1603–1609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Kim DH, Reichelderfer M, Gopal DV, Pfau PR (2006) Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers. Radiology 241:417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwicki D et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rollandi GA, Biscaldi E, DeCicco E (2007) Double contrast barium enema: technique, indications, results and limitations of a conventional imaging methodology in the MDCT virtual endoscopy era. Eur Radiol 61:382–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman S, Cenni JC, Roy P, Pujol B, Napoleon B, Keriven-Souquet O, Souquet JC (2004) Value of rectal ultrasound in predicting staging and outcome in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1323–1330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Belli G, Rotondano G (1995) Colorectal cancer. Diagnosis of recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 5:831–841

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Röttgen R, Fischbach F, Plotkin M, Herzog H, Freund T, Schröder RJ, Felix R (2005) Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography. Acta Radiol 46:222–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer R (2003) Adjuvant vs neoadjuvant combined modality treatment for locally advanced cancer: first results of the German Rectal Cancer Study (CAO/ARO/AIO-94). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:124–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiepers C, Penninck F, Vadder N de et al. (1995) Contribution of PET in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional imaging. Eur J Surg Oncol 21:517–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK (2006) Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions. RadioGraphics 26:1669–1686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E et al. (2006) Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 16:2275–2283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss LG, Clorius JH, Schlag P, Lehner B, Kimmig B, Engenhart R et al. (1989) Recurrence of colorectal tumors: PET evaluation. Radiology 170:329–332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellström M (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222:337–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Bassett P, Vance M, Bartram CI (2003) Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 181:913–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoeni RF (1997) Colorectal cancer. Radiologic staging. Radiol Clin North Am 35:457–485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D et al. (2002) Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol 12:1410–1415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger A (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319:525–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson K et al. (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wichmann MW et al. and the Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2002) Results of long-term follow-up after curative resection of Dukes A colorectal cancer. World J Surg 26:732–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Stewart ET et al. (1992) The National Polyp Study. Design, methods, and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed polyps. National Polyp Study Workgroup. Cancer 70:1236–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS et al. (1996) Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps. National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 334:82–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG (2000) A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. N Engl J Med 342:1766–1772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winawer SJ, Fletcher R, Rex D et al. (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 142:544–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittekind C, Meyer HJ, Bootz F (Hrsg) (2002) UICC: TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren, 6. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittekind C, Klimpfinger M, Sobin LH (Hrsg) (2005) TNM-Atlas. Illustrierter Leitfaden zur TNM/pTNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren, 5. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zauber AG, Winawer SJ (1997) Initial management and followup surveillance of patients with colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 26:85–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zerhouni EA, Rutter C, Hamilton SR, Balfe DM, Megibow AJ, Francis IR et al. (1996) CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology 200:443–451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann F, Molls M (2003) Indikationen zur neoadjuvanten Therapie beim Rektumkarzinom. Chirurg 74:887–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentralinstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein gGmbH, Bremserstraße 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen

    G. Layer (Prof. Dr. med.)

  2. Abteilung für Radiologische Diagnostik, Klinikum der Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen

    A. Kopp (PD Dr. med.)

  3. Radiologisches Zentralinstitut, Städtische Kliniken Frankfurt-Höchst, Gotenstraße 6-8, 65929, Frankfurt

    M. Müller-Schimpfle (Prof. Dr. med.)

Authors
  1. G. Layer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Kopp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Müller-Schimpfle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Zentralinstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Bremserstraße 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen

    Günter Layer

  2. Forschungsschwerpunkt Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg

    Gerhard van Kaick

  3. Abteilung Radiologie (E010), Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg

    Stefan Delorme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Layer, G., Kopp, A., Müller-Schimpfle, M. (2008). Kolorektales Karzinom. In: Layer, G., van Kaick, G., Delorme, S. (eds) Radiologische Diagnostik in der Onkologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29319-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29319-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29318-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-29319-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation