Skip to main content

Improving Decision Tree Performance Through Induction- and Cluster-Based Stratified Sampling

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2004 (IDEAL 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3177))

  • 1356 Accesses

Abstract

It is generally recognised that recursive partitioning, as used in the construction of classification trees, is inherently unstable, particularly for small data sets. Classification accuracy and, by implication, tree structure, are sensitive to changes in the training data. Successful approaches to counteract this effect include multiple classifiers, e.g. boosting, bagging or windowing. The downside of these multiple classification models, however, is the plethora of trees that result, often making it difficult to extract the classifier in a meaningful manner. We show that, by using some very weak knowledge in the sampling stage, when the data set is partitioned into the training and test sets, a more consistent and improved performance is achieved by a single decision tree classifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breiman, L.: Bias, variance, and arcing classifiers. Technical report 460, Department of Statistics, University of California at Berkeley (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman, L.: Bias, variance, and arcing classifiers. Machine Learning 26 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24, 123–140 (1996)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 148–156 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shannon, W.: Averaging classification tree models. In: Interface 1998 Proceedings (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Quinlan, J.R.: Miniboosting decision trees. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Murthy, S.K., Kasif, S., Salzberg, S.: A system for induction of oblique decision trees. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2, 1–32 (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Svozil, D., Pospíchal, J., Kvasnicka, V.: Neural-network prediction of Carbon-13 NMR chemical shifts of alcanes. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 35, 924–928 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gill, A.A., Smith, G.D., Bagnall, A.J. (2004). Improving Decision Tree Performance Through Induction- and Cluster-Based Stratified Sampling. In: Yang, Z.R., Yin, H., Everson, R.M. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2004. IDEAL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28651-6_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28651-6_50

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22881-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28651-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics