Skip to main content

Coalition Formation among Agents in Complex Problems Based on a Combinatorial Auction Perspective

  • Conference paper
Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2004)

Abstract

In this paper, we try to apply a combinatorial auction protocol to a coalition formation among agents to solve complex problems. This paper focuses on a scheduling problem that considers various constraints as a complex problem. Constraints on scheduling can be expressed as combinations of items (time slots) in a combinatorial auction. Agents bid for necessary combinations of time slots to satisfy users’ requirements. We formalize a combinatorial auction for scheduling as an MIP (Mixed Integer Programming) problem, which integrates the constraints on items and bids to express complex problems. We have experimentally confirmed that our method can obtain a socially preferable schedule in practical time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, A., Tenhunen, M., Ygge, F.: Integer programming for combinatorial auction winner determination. In: Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), pp. 39–46 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boutilier, C., Goldszmidt, M., Sabata, B.: Sequential auctions for the allocation of resources with complementarities. In: Proc. of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), pp. 527–534 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fujishima, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y.: Taming the computation complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approaches. In: Proc. of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), pp. 548–553 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harvey, W.D., Ginsberg, M.L.: Limited discrepancy search. In: Proc. of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), pp. 607–613 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hattori, H., Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y., Shintani, T.: A dynamic programming model for determining bidding strategies in sequential auctions: Quasi-linear utility and budget constraints. In: Proc. of the 17th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2001), pp. 211–218 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk/glpk.html

  7. Hunsberger, L., Grosz, B.J.: A combinatorial auction for collaborative planning. In: Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), pp. 151–158 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rassenti, S., Smith, V., Bulfin, R.: Combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. Bell Journal of Economics 13(2), 402–417 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakurai, Y., Yokoo, M.: An average-case budget-non-negative double auction protocol. In: Proc. of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 104–111 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sakurai, Y., Yokoo, M., Kamei, K.: An efficient approximate algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions. In: Proc. of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 2000), pp. 30–37 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sandholm, T.: An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. In: Proc. of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), pp. 542–547 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sen, S., Haynes, T., Arora, N.: Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47, 407–427 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsuruta, T., Shintani, T.: Scheduling meetings using distributed valued constraint satisfaction algorithm. In: Proc. of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), pp. 383–387 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hattori, H., Ozono, T., Ito, T., Shintani, T. (2004). Coalition Formation among Agents in Complex Problems Based on a Combinatorial Auction Perspective. In: Orchard, B., Yang, C., Ali, M. (eds) Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3029. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24677-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24677-0_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22007-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24677-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics