Skip to main content

A Comparison of Neural Network Input Vector Selection Techniques

  • Conference paper
Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2004)

Abstract

One of the difficulties of using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to estimate atmospheric temperature is the large number of potential input variables available. In this study, four different feature extraction methods were used to reduce the input vector to train four networks to estimate temperature at different atmospheric levels. The four techniques used were: genetic algorithms (GA), coefficient of determination (CoD), mutual information (MI) and simple neural analysis (SNA). The results demonstrate that of the four methods used for this data set, mutual information and simple neural analysis can generate networks that have a smaller input parameter set, while still maintaining a high degree of accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. LeMarshall, J.: An Intercomparison of Temperature and Moisture Fields Derived from TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder Data by Different Retrieval Techniques. Part I: Basic Statistics. Journal of Applied Meteorology 27, 1282–1293 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowles, A.: Machine Learns Which Features to Select. In: Proceedings of the 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 127–132 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nadal, J., Brune, N., Parga, N.: Nonlinear feedforward networks with stochastic outputs: infomax implies redundancy reduction. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 9(2), 207–217 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley, Reading (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiss, N., Hassett, M.: Introductory Statistics. Addison-Wesley, USA (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, W.: Mutual Information Functions versus Correlation Functions. Journal of Statistical Physics 60(5/6), 823–836 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Reza, F.: An Introduction to Information Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fraser, A.M., Swinney, H.L.: Independent Coordinates for Strange Attractors from Mutual Information. Physical Review A 33/2, 1134–1140 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bureau of Meteorology, Manual of Meteorology – Part 1. General Meteorology. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Choi, B., Hendtlass, T., Bluff, K. (2004). A Comparison of Neural Network Input Vector Selection Techniques. In: Orchard, B., Yang, C., Ali, M. (eds) Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3029. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24677-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24677-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22007-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24677-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics