Skip to main content

Automatic Detection of Abnormal Tissue in Bilateral Mammograms Using Neural Networks

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3025))

Abstract

A novel method for accurate detection of regions of interest (ROIs) that contain circumscribed lesions in X-rays mammograms based on bilateral subtraction is presented. Implementing this method requires left and right breast images alignment using a cross-correlation criterion followed by a windowing analysis in mammogram pairs. Furthermore, a set of qualification criteria is employed to filter these regions, retaining the most suspicious for which a Radial-Basis Function Neural Network makes the final decision marking them as ROIs that contain abnormal tissue. Extensive experiments have shown that the proposed method detects the location of the circumscribed lesions with accuracy of 95.8% in the MIAS database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Martin, J., Moskowitz, M., Milbrath, J.: Breast cancer missed by mammography. AJR 132, 737 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kalisher, L.: Factors influencing false negative rates in xero-mammography. Radiology 133, 297 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tabar, L., Dean, B.P.: Teaching Atlas of Mammography, 2nd edn. Thieme, NY (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christoyianni, I., Dermatas, E., Kokkinakis, G.: Fast Detection of Masses in Computer- Aided Mammography. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 17(1), 54–64 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, H., Wei, D., Helvie, M., Sahiner, B., Adler, D., Goodsitt, M., Petrick, N.: Computer- Aided Classification of Mammographic Masses and Normal Tissue: Linear Discriminant analysis in Texture Feature Space. Phys. Med. Biol, 40, 857–876 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meersman, D., Scheunders, P., Dyck, V.D.: Detection of Microcalcifications using Neural Networks. In: Proc. of the 3rd Int. Workshop on Digital Mammograph, Chicago, IL, pp. 97–103 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dhawan, P.A., Chite, Y., Bonasso, C., Wheeler, K.: Radial-Basis-Function Based Classification of Mammographic Microcalcifications Using Texture Features. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology & CMBEC, 535–536 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sonka, M., Fitzpatrick, J.: Handbook of Medical Imaging. SPIE Press, San Jose (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Doi, K., Giger, M., Nishikawa, R., Schmidt, R. (eds.): Digital Mammography 1996. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Méndez, A.J., Tahoces, P.G., Lado, M.J., Souto, M., Vidal, J.J.: Computer-aided diagnosis: Automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms. Medical Physics 25, 957–964 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bovis, K.J., Singh, S.: Detection of Masses in Mammograms using Texture Measures. In: Proc.15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 267–270. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiles, S., Brady, M., Highnam, R.: Comparing mammogram pairs for the detection of lesions. In: International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bickel, P.J., Doksum, K.A.: Mathematical statistics. Holden- Day, California (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html

  15. Woods, K.S.: Automated Image Analysis Techniques for Digital Mammography, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Florida (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kegelmeyer, W., Pruneda, J., Bourland, P., Hillis, A., Riggs, M., Nipper, M.: Computer- Aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191, 331–337 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Christoyianni, I., Constantinou, E., Dermatas, E. (2004). Automatic Detection of Abnormal Tissue in Bilateral Mammograms Using Neural Networks. In: Vouros, G.A., Panayiotopoulos, T. (eds) Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence. SETN 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3025. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24674-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24674-9_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21937-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24674-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics