Skip to main content

Inequality in Collective Action Problems

  • Chapter

Abstract

Rainer-Olaf Schultze was a second supervisor for my dissertation and he took this role very seriously. He showed me what to do and how, and more importantly: what not to do. I was very grateful for his advice, if not always in the very first moment, than surely later on. Looking back, I am still grateful because his level of engagement was not at all a matter of course. Although my ways led me elsewhere soon, geographically and academically, Rainer-Olaf further supported me in the early phases of my career and we never lost contact. There was one strong bond between us, namely our disagreement about the value of rational choice analysis. In what follows I do not strive to persuade Rainer-Olaf of the usefulness of this kind of reasoning; instead I want to demonstrate what I have learned at least: the rational actor is a fiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Bates, Robert (1988): Contra Contractarianism. Some Reflections on the New Institutionalism. Politics and Society. 16. 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, Ken (2006): Why do people cooperate? In: Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 5. 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon (1985): Rationality, Morality, and Collective Action. In: Ethics. 96, 136–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Armin/Fischbacher, Urs 2002: The Economics of Reciprocity – Theory and Evidence. In: Freeman, Richard (2002): 207–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Armin/Fischbacher, Urs/Fehr, Ernst/Fischbacher, Urs (2003): Reasons for Conflict – Lessons From Bargaining Experiments. In: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 159. 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Armin/Fischbacher, Urs/Fehr, Ernst/Fischbacher, Urs/Fehr, Ernst/Fischbacher, Urs (2008): Testing Theories of Fairness – Intentions Matter. In: Games and Economic Behavior. 62. 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst/Schmidt, Klaus M. (1999): A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics. 114. 817–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst/Schmidt, Klaus M./Götte, Lorenz (2008): Do Workers work More if Wages Are High? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment. In: American Economic Review. 97. 298–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst/Schmidt, Klaus M./Götte, Lorenz/Fischbacher, Urs (2003): The Nature of Human Altruism. In: Nature. 425. 23 October 2003. 785–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst/Schmidt, Klaus M./Rockenbach, Bettina (2002): Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. In: Nature. 422. 15 March 2002. 137–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst/Schmidt, Klaus M./Rockenbach, Bettina/Gächter, Simon (2002): Altruistic Punishment in Humans. In: Nature. 415. 10 January 2002. 137–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst/Schmidt, Klaus M./Rockenbach, Bettina/Gächter, Simon/Gintis, Herbert/Bowles, Samuel/Boyd, Robert (2003): Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. In: Evolution and Human Behavior. 24. 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst/Schmidt, Klaus M./Rockenbach, Bettina/Gächter, Simon/Gintis, Herbert/Bowles, Samuel/Boyd, Robert/Naef, Michael/Schmidt, Klaus M. (2006): Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments, Comment. In: American Economic Review. 96. 1912–1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard (ed.) (2002): Inequality Around the World. New York: Palgrave MacMillan: 207–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, Drew/Maskin, Eric (1986): The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information. In: Econometrica 54. 533–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, Philipp/Plümper, Thomas (1996): Kommunikation und Kooperation in der internationalen Bankenregulierung. In: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen. 3. 225–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Robert (1992): Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth, Werner/Huck, Steffen/Müller, Wieland (2001): The Relevance of Equal Splits in Ultimatum Games. In: Games and Economic Behavior. 37. 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güth, Werner/Huck, Steffen/Müller, Wieland/Schmittberger, Rolf/Schwarze, Bernd (1982): An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 3. 367–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güth, Werner/Huck, Steffen/Müller, Wieland/Schmittberger, Rolf/Schwarze, Bernd/Berninghaus, Siegfried/Kirstein, Annette (2008): Trading Goods versus Sharing Money – An Experiment Testing Whether Fairness and Efficiency are Frame Dependent. In: Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics Research. 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth, Werner/Huck, Steffen/Müller, Wieland/Schmittberger, Rolf/Schwarze, Bernd/Berninghaus, Siegfried/Kirstein, Annette/Fischer, Sven/Stiehler, Andreas/Müller, Wieland (2006): From Ultimatum to Nash Bargaining, Theory and Experimental Evidence. In: Experimental Economics. 9. 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Russell (1982): Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, Katharina (2001): Aggregation Technology of Common Goods and its Strategic Consequences. Global Warming, Biodiversity and Siting Conflicts. In: European Journal of Political Research. 40. 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, Katharina (2003): Common Goods, Matrix Games, and Institutional Solutions. In: European Journal of International Relations. 9. 173–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, Katharina 2005: Tax Competition and Tax Co-operation in the EU. The Case of Savings Taxation. In: Rationality and Society. 17. 475–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, John H./Roth, Alvin E. (eds.) (1995): The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, David M./Milgrom, Paul/Roberts, John/Wilson, Robert (1982): Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma. In: Journal of Economic Theory. 27, 245–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, David M. (1990): Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liebrand, Wim B.G. (1983): A Classification of Social Dilemma Games. In: Simulation and Games. 14. 123–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebrand, Wim B.G./Messick, David M. (1996): Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research, New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Lisa L. 1993: The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism. In: Ruggie, John Gerard (1993): 91–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, James D. (1994): Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, John (1951): Non-Co-operative Games. In: Annals of Mathematics. 54. 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, John von/Morgenstern, Oskar (1943): Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Rümelin, Julian (1991): Practical Reason or Metapreferences? An Undogmatic Defense of Kantian Morality. In: Theory and Decision. 30, 133–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, Jack 1995: Coordination Problems. In: Kagel, John H./Roth, Alvin E. (1995): 111–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur (1965): The Logic of Collective Action, Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, Peter C. (1992): A Political Theory Primer, New York-London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor (1990): Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol (1988): Experiments with N-Person Social Traps, I. Prisoner’s Dilemma, Weak Prisoner’s Dilemma, Volunteer’s Dilemma and Largest Number. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution. 32. 457–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holzinger, K. (2012). Inequality in Collective Action Problems. In: Grasnick, J., Walter, K. (eds) Politik in Nordamerika und Europa. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19498-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19498-1_11

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19497-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19498-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics