Skip to main content

Measuring Authoritarianism with Different Sets of Items in a Longitudinal Study

  • Chapter
Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences

Abstract

Authoritarianism is a form of social behavior characterized by strict obedience to the authority of a state or organization and adherence to enforcing and maintaining control through the use of oppressive measures. It refers to a complex of nine subsyndromes (Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, and Sanford, 1950), of which conventionalism (strict adherence to conventional values), aggression and submission are the most important (Meloen, 1991). The subsyndromes explain why authoritarian people tend to look down on (contraidentify) and discriminate social or ethnic groups that are ‘different’. Authoritarianism is part of a broader cluster of cultural conservative attitudes, especially vivid within the lower social classes (Meloen and Middendorp, 1985; De Witte, 1990). Scheepers, Felling, and Peters (1992) argue that a sociological explanation for an authoritarian attitude lies within the need for compensation for political powerlessness, caused by unfavorable social circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, David J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Row. (Abridged edition, 1982, New York: Norton and Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Billiet, Jaak B. and Hans De Witte. 2008. Everyday Racism as Predictor of Political Racism in Flemish Belgium. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte, Hans. 1990. Conformisme, radicalisme en machteloosheid: Een onderzoek naar de sociaalculturele en sociaal-economische opvattingen van arbeiders in Vlaanderen. Leuven: HIVA-KU Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interuniversitair Steunpunt Politieke-Opinieonderzoek K.U. Leuven. 1991. General Election Study: Codebook and Questionnaire. Leuven: ISPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interuniversitair Steunpunt Politieke-Opinieonderzoek K.U. Leuven. 1995. General Election Study: Codebook and Questionnaire. Leuven: ISPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interuniversitair Steunpunt Politieke-Opinieonderzoek K.U. Leuven. 1999. General Election Study: Codebook and Questionnaire. Leuven: ISPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. 1971. Statistical Analysis of Sets of Congeneric Tests. 36: 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. 1974. Analyzing Psychological Data by Structural Analysis of Covariance Matrices. In Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology: Vol. II, eds. David H. Krantz, Richard C. Atkinson, R. Duncan Luce, and Patrick Suppes, 1–56. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl. G. and Dag Sörbom.1996. LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloen, Jos D. 1991. De autoritarisme-concepten van Adorno en Altemeyer vergeleken: Theoretische analyse en empirische test. In Onderdanig en intolerant: Lacunes en controverses in autoritarisme-studies, eds. Peer Scheepers and Rob Eisinga, 103–126. Nijmegen: ITS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloen, Jos and Cees Middendorp. 1985. Potentieel fascisme in Nederland. In Jaarboek van de Nederlandse Vereniging van Marktonderzoekers, 93–108. Haarlem: De Vrieseborgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oud, Johan H. L. and Robert A. R. G. Jansen. 2000. Continuous Time State Space Modeling of Panel Data by Means of SEM. 65: 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers, Peer, Albert Felling, and Jan Peters. 1992. Anomie, Authoritarianism and Ethnocentrism: Update of a Classic Theme and an Empirical Test. 2: 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toharudin, Toni, Johan H. L. Oud, and Jaak B. Billiet. 2008. Assessing the Relationships between Nationalism, Ethnocentrism, and Individualism in Flanders using Bergstrom’s Approximate Discrete Model. 62: 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Toharudin, T., Oud, J., Billiet, J., Folmer, H. (2012). Measuring Authoritarianism with Different Sets of Items in a Longitudinal Study. In: Salzborn, S., Davidov, E., Reinecke, J. (eds) Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18898-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics