Skip to main content

Zum in Bavarian and Scrambling

  • Chapter
Dialektsyntax

Part of the book series: Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft ((LINGB,volume 5))

Zusammenfassung

If we neglect the ever present influences from Standard German (SG) on Bavarian (B) which has led to corrupted versions of the dialect, it is fair to say that B lacks the zu-infinitive.1 SG zu is in B either the cliticized form z’ or zum (also zun.) i.e., zu and a cliticized dative determiner (zu+(de)m).2 I agree with Merkle (1984: 44 f.) and Zehetner (1985: 148) who both note that zu-infinitives are felt as not belonging to the dialect. In this article, I will ignore the additional complications that arise with z’, and concentrate on syntactic properties of zum only.3 B uses various strategies for the expression of the SG infinitival construction with zu, from nominalizations (sometimes combined with prepositions) via the zum-gerund to finite sentences which are introduced with the complementizer daß. The SG sentence in (la), for example, would have to be translated as (lb):

For their comments and/or help with important information, I want to thank Christian Dütschmarm, Marinel Gerritsen, Beatrice Santorini, Bonnie Schwartz and especially Werner Abraham.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abney, S. (1987): The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (1988): Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, J. and J. Komfilt (1990): “Restructuring effects in German”. In: E. Engdahl, M. Reape, M. Mellor and R. Cooper, eds. (1990), 21 – 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, J. and J. Komfilt (1991): “Against scrambling as move-α”. Ms. Heinrich-Heine Universität Düsseldorf and Syracuse University. To appear in: N. Cower & H. van Riemsdijk, eds. (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, C. (1990): Die syntaktische Struktur der Nominalphrase im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, C. and C. Schmidt (this volume): “Die am-Konstruktion im Kölnischen und im umgangssprachlichen Standarddeutschen als Aspekt-Phrasen”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brons-Albert, R. (1984): “Die sogenannte ‘Rheinische Verlaufsform’: Stör mich nicht, ich bin am arbeiten!” In: Rechtsrheinisches Köln. Jahrbuch für Geschichte und Landeskunde 9 /19, 199 – 204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinaletti, A., G. Cinque and G. Giusti, eds. (1988): Constituent Structure. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986): Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986): Barriers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1989): “Some notes on economy of derivation and representation”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, ed. by I. Laka and A. Mahajan, 43 – 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1992): A minimalist program for linguistic theory. Ms. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N and H. Lasnik (1991): “Principles and parameters theory”. Ms. MIT. To appear in: J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann, eds. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, K. (1990): “Zurich German z and verb raising constructions”. In: Engdahl, E., M. Reape, M. Mellor and R. Cooper, eds. (1990), 67 – 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cower, N. and H. van Riemsdijk, eds. (1992): [Proceedings of the 1990 Tilburg workshop on scrambling]. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donhauser, K. (1989): “Die Infinitivkonstruktionen mit z’ und zum im Bairischen”. In: E. Koller, W. Wegstein and N. Wolf, eds. (1984), 291 – 304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, R.P. (1978): Historische Syntax des Deutschen. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E., M. Reape, M. Mellor and R. Cooper, eds. (1990): Parametric Variation in Germanic and Romance: Proceedings from a DYANA Workshop, September 1989. Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (1975): The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German. Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, G. (1990): “Scrambling as NP-movement”. In: G. Grewendorf and W. Stemefeld, eds. (1990), 113 – 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, R. and J. Higginbotham (1981): “Opacity in NP”. Linguistic Analysis 7, 395 – 422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, M. (1992): Deflection in Flemish between the 13th and 20th century: An interplay between analogical and articulatory factors. [to appear in: Language Variation and Change, vol. 4]

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, G. and W. Sternefeld, eds. (1990): Scrambling and Barriers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéron, J. and T. Hoekstra (1988): “T-chains and the constituent structure of auxiliaries”. In: A. Cardinaletti, G. Cinque and G. Giusti, eds. (1988), 35 – 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman L (this volume): “Some speculations on arguments shift, clitics and crossing in West-Flemish”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, E., W. Wegstein and N. Wolf, eds. (1989): Bayerisch-österreichische Dialektforschung. Würzburg: Könighausen and Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, J. (1987): Domains and Dynasties. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, L. (1984): Bairische Grammatik. München: Hugendubel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. (1991): “Abstrakte Inkorporation”. In: S. Olsen and G. Fanselow, eds. (1991), 155 – 202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. and W. Stemefeld (1990): Improper Movement. Arbeitspapier 26. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. and W. Stemefeld (1991): Scrambling as A-bar movement. Ms. Universität Konstanz. To appear in: N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk, eds. (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. and G. Fanselow, eds. (1991): Det, COMP und INFL. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H., H. Moser and I. Schröbler (1969): Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.Y. (1989): “Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinzhorn, M. (1990): “Head movement and scrambling domains”. In: G. Grewendorf & W. Sternefeld, eds. (1990), 199 – 215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuland, E. (1983): “Governing -ing”. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 101 – 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk, H. (1978): A Case Study in Linguistic Markedness. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L. (1990): Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Sciullo, A. and E. Williams (1987): On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, R. (1987): “Over de aan het constructie, lexicale morphologie en casustheorie”. In: N. Corver & J. Koster, eds. (1987), Grammaticaliteiten. Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature 7, 273 – 329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speas, M. (1990): Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, L. (1912): Jozef Filsers Briefwexel. München: Albert Langen. [reprinted 1986, München: Piper]

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. (1984): Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webelhuth, G. (1989): Syntactic Saturation Phenomena and the Modern Germanic Languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehetner, L. (1985): Das bairische Dialektbuch. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, J.-W. (this volume): “Clues from dialect syntax: Complementizer agreement”.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Werner Abraham Josef Bayer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bayer, J. (1993). Zum in Bavarian and Scrambling. In: Abraham, W., Bayer, J. (eds) Dialektsyntax. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft, vol 5. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97032-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97032-9_3

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12422-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-97032-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics