Abstract
Thaler (Journal of Economic Perspectives 14:133–141, 2000) predicted that the paradigm of Homo economicus, which basically formulates the rationality of economic behavior in an ideal mathematical optimization framework and had dominated orthodox economics for a substantial period of the entire twentieth century, would “evolve” into the paradigm of Homo sapiens, which emphasizes the consideration of the psychological, cultural, and social factors that constrain a human’s rationality. We applied a corpus linguistic approach to examine whether this prediction is true. To this end, we built a corpus using the abstracts of 51,285 economics research articles published from 1992 to 2014 in 42 mainstream economics journals. By analyzing the upward-trending and downward-trending words in this corpus, we found the Homo sapiens paradigm to have expanded significantly, while there was no clear evidence of the concession of the Homo economicus paradigm. From the analysis of increasingly used words related to Homo sapiens we can further attribute the expansion of the Homo sapiens paradigm to the research attention increasingly drawn to the interdisciplinary integration of the social sciences, human heterogeneity and (cognitive) constraints, and the complexity of economic behaviors. Likewise, from the analysis of words related to Homo economicus that are less and less used, we found that the research attention directed to the concept of equilibrium was gradually drawn away. Our main finding based on the corpus linguistic analysis was further supported and consolidated by the co-word network analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Since only WordSmith can recognize stemmed words, a.k.a., the “*” symbol, and ConText cannot, we removed the * symbol and changed the stemmed words to normal words when using the tool ConText.
- 4.
In a sense, this simply means that it is becoming increasingly difficult for the pure theoretical model to be accepted and published.
References
Arthur, W. B. (2014). Complexity and the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bianchi, M., Boyle, M., & Hollingsworth, D. (1999). A comparison of methods for trend estimation. Applied Economics Letters, 6(2), 103–109.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blaug, M. (2001). No history of ideas, please, we’re economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 145–164.
Borgatti, S. P. (1995). Centrality and AIDS. Connections, 18(1), 112–114.
De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
Diesner, J. (2014). ConText: Software for the integrated analysis of text data and network data. In Social and semantic networks in communication research. Seattle, WA: Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA).
Dohmen, T. (2014). Behavioral labor economics: Advances and future directions. Labour Economics, 30, 71–85.
Flowerdew, L. (2015). Using corpus-based research and online academic corpora to inform writing of the discussion section of a thesis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 58–68.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
Frey, B. S. (1997). Not just for the money. London: Edward Elgar Publisher.
He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., & Stengos, T. (2011). An updated ranking of academic journals in economics. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 44(4), 1525–1538.
Knight, D., Walsh, S., & Papagiannidis, S. (2015). I’m having a Spring Clear Out: A corpus-based analysis of e-transactional discourse. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 234–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv019.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lovejoy, A. O. (2011). The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
McDonald, I. M. (2009). The global financial crisis and behavioural economics. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 28(3), 249–254.
Mill, J. S. (1874). On the definition of political economy, and on the method of investigation proper to it. In Essays on some unsettled questions of political economy (2nd ed.). London: Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer.
Nowak, M., & Highfield, R. (2011). Super cooperators: Altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Pumfrey, S., Rayson, P., & Mariani, J. (2012). Experiments in 17th century English: Manual versus automatic conceptual history. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 27(4), 395–408.
Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2008). A companion to digital humanities. New York: Wiley.
Scott, M. (2001). Comparing corpora and identifying key words, collocations, and frequency distributions through the WordSmith tools suite of computer programs. Small Corpus Studies and ELT, 47–67.
Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.
Thaler, R. H. (2000). From homo economicus to Homo sapiens. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 133–141.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Acknowledgements
The second author is grateful for the research support in the form of Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) Grants, MOST 106-2410-H-004-006-MY2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zou, Y., Chen, SH. (2018). Has Homo economicus Evolved into Homo sapiens from 1992 to 2014: What Does Corpus Linguistics Say?. In: Chen, SH. (eds) Big Data in Computational Social Science and Humanities. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95465-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95465-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95464-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95465-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)