Skip to main content

Towards a Macroscopic View of Using an Assistive Technology for Mobility for Its Development: Assessing Users’ and Co-users’ Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology (AHFE 2018)

Abstract

This paper aims to propose an approach to include a holistic user experience (UX) perspective in the development of an assistive technology for mobility, more precisely an intelligent powered wheelchair (IPW). First, the UX related to the anticipated experience (powered wheelchair users, caregivers, clinicians) was obtained in a previous study in order to define technological and functional specifications. Second, the UX related to the episodic and momentary experience were highlighted within a Living lab approach. In that framework, we tested with end-users an IPW in an ecological setting, a mall. For our next step, we propose a methodology to apprehend the cumulative experience. This study will take into account co-users, i.e. co-workers, other pedestrians, etc., that most studies do not take into account and that, in diverse ecological settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barcenilla, J., Bastien, J.-M.-C.: L’acceptabilité des nouvelles technologies: quelles relations avec l’ergonomie, l’utilisabilité et l’expérience utilisateur ? Le travail Humain 4(72), 311–331 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simpson, R.C.: Smart wheelchairs: a literature review. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 42(4), 423–436 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization: Guideline on the Provision of Manual Wheelchairs in Less-Ressourced Settings. WHO Press, Geneva (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kairy, D., et al.: Users’ perspectives of intelligent power wheelchair use for social participation. In: Conference Proceeding RESNA 36th International Conference on Technology and Disability, Bellevue (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kairy, D., et al.: Exploring powered wheelchair users and their caregivers’ perspectives on potential intelligent power wheelchair use: a qualitative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11(2), 2244–2261 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rushton, P.W., et al.: The potential impact of intelligent power wheelchair use on social participation: perspective of users, caregivers and clinicians. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 10(3), 191–197 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boucher, P., et al.: Design and validation of an intelligent wheelchair towards a clinically-functional outcome. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 10, 58 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pineau, J., Atrash, A., Kaplow, R., Villemure, J.: On the design and validation of an intelligent powered wheelchair: lessons from the SmartWheeler project. In: Brain, Body and Machine: Proceedings of an International Symposium on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of McGill University Centre for Intelligent Machines Series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol. 83, pp 259–270 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsang, E., Ong, S.C.W., Pineau, J.: Design and evaluation of a flexible interface for spatial navigation. In: Conference on Computer Robot Vision, Toronto (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heylighen, A., Bianchin, M.: How does inclusive design relate to good design? Des. Stud. 34, 93–110 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience - a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: User experience white paper bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. In: Result from Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience, Dagstuhl, pp. 1–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, R.H., Mihailidis, A., Dutta, T., Fernie, G.R.: Usability testing of multimodal feedback interface and simulated collision-avoidance power wheelchair for long-term-care home residents with cognitive impairments. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48(7), 801–822 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guerdira, Y., Farcy, R., Desailly, E., Bellik, Y.: Évaluation cinématique d’une interface tactile pour le pilotage d’un fauteuil roulant électrique: une étude pilote. In: AFIHM 29th Conference francophone sur l’Interaction Homme-Machine, Poitiers, pp. 281–290 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jutai, J.W., Fuhrer, M.J., Demers, L., Scherer, M.J., DeRuyter, F.: Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84(4), 294–302 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bastien, J.-M.-C., Scapin, D.L.: Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human-computer interfaces. Technical report Institut National de Recherche en Information et Automatique RT-0156 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Programme d’habiltés en fauteuil roulant. http://www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/

  18. Finstad, K.: The system usability scale and non-native english speakers. J. Usability Stud. 1(4), 185–188 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mollo, V., Falzon, P.: Auto- and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. Appl. Ergon. 35(6), 531–540 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rix, G., Biache, M.-J.: Enregistrement en perspective subjective située et entretien en re-situ subjectif: une methodologie de la constitution de l’expérience. Intellectica 1(38), 363–396 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. McLellan, S., Muddimer, A., Peres, S.C.: The effect of experience on system usability scale ratings. J. Usability Stud. 7(2), 56–67 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the CRIR-Living Lab Vivant team who have supported our project from the beginning. We also thank the management of Place Alexis-Nihon for welcoming us into their space. These projects and the first author were funded by FQRNT (INTER Strategic Network), NSERC Canadian Network on Field Robotics (NCFRN), and NCE AGE-WELL. Without the team of students and clinicians, the ever-changing project would not have been possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Marie Hébert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hébert, AM., Archambault, P., Kairy, D. (2019). Towards a Macroscopic View of Using an Assistive Technology for Mobility for Its Development: Assessing Users’ and Co-users’ Experience. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 794. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_83

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_83

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94946-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94947-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics