Skip to main content

Mood Mirroring with an Embodied Virtual Agent: A Pilot Study on the Relationship Between Personalized Visual Feedback and Adherence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 887))

Abstract

Human support is thought to increase adherence to internet-based interventions for common mental health disorders, but can be costly and reduce treatment accessibility. Embodied virtual agents may be used to deliver automated support, but while many solutions have been shown to be feasible, there is still little controlled research that empirically validates their clinical effectiveness in this context. This study uses a controlled and randomized paradigm to investigate whether feedback from an embodied virtual agent can increase adherence. In a three-week ecological momentary assessment smartphone study, 68 participants were asked to report their mood three times a day. An embodied virtual agent could mirror participant-reported mood states when thanking them for their answers. A two-stage randomization into a text and personalized visual feedback group, versus a text-only control group, was applied to control for individual differences (study onset) and feedback history (after two weeks). Results indicate that while personalized visual feedback did not increase adherence, it did manage to keep adherence constant over a three-week period, whereas fluctuations in adherence could be observed in the text-only control group. Although this was a pilot study, and its results should be interpreted with some caution, this paper shows how virtual agent feedback may have a stabilizing effect on adherence, how controlled experiments on the relationship between virtual agent support and clinically relevant measures such as adherence can be conducted, and how results may be analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., Riper, H., Hedman, E.: Guided internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 13, 288–295 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richards, D., Richardson, T.: Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 32, 329–342 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schueller, S.M., Tomasino, K.N., Mohr, D.C.: Integrating human support into behavioral intervention technologies: the efficiency model of support. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 24, 27–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohr, D.C., Cuijpers, P., Lehman, K.: Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 13, e30 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Ballegooijen, W., Cuijpers, P., Van Straten, A., Karyotaki, E., Andersson, G., Smit, J.H., Riper, H.: Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e100674 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donkin, L., Christensen, H., Naismith, S.L., Neal, B., Hickie, I.B., Glozier, N.: A systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e-therapies. J. Med. Internet Res. 13, e52 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Provoost, S., Lau, H.M., Ruwaard, J., Riper, H.: Embodied conversational agents in clinical psychology: a scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 19, e151 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shiffman, S., Stone, A.A., Hufford, M.R.: Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4, 1–32 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wenze, S.J., Miller, I.W.: Use of ecological momentary assessment in mood disorders research. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30, 794–804 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Isbister, K., Doyle, P.: The blind men and the elephant revisited. In: Ruttkay, Z., Pelachaud, C. (eds.) From Brows to Trust. HIS, vol. 7, pp. 3–26. Springer, Dordrecht (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2730-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bickmore, T., Schulman, D., Shaw, G.: DTask and LiteBody: open source, standards-based tools for building web-deployed embodied conversational agents. In: Ruttkay, Z., Kipp, M., Nijholt, A., Vilhjálmsson, H.H. (eds.) IVA 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5773, pp. 425–431. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04380-2_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gratch, J., Hartholt, A.: Virtual humans: a new toolkit for cognitive science research. Proc. Cogn. Sci. Soc. 35, 41–42 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mumm, J., Mutlu, B.: Designing motivational agents: the role of praise, social comparison, and embodiment in computer feedback. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 1643–1650 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bickmore, T., Schulman, D., Sidner, C.L.: Issues in Designing Agents for Long-Term Behavior Change. In: CHI Workshop on Engagement by Design, pp. 1–5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. movisensXS, Version 0.7.4162 (movisens GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). https://xs.movisens.com/

  16. Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Asselbergs, J., Ruwaard, J., Ejdys, M., Schrader, N., Sijbrandij, M., Riper, H.: Mobile phone-based unobtrusive ecological momentary assessment of day-to-day mood: an explorative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e72 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Desmet, P.M.A., Vastenburg, M.H., Van Bel, D., Romero, N.: Pick-a-mood development and application of a pictorial mood-reporting instrument. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Design and Emotion, London 2012, Central Saint Martins College, Art and Design, 11–14 September 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 485–500 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kelders, M.S., Kok, N.R., Ossebaard, C.H., Van Gemert-Pijnen, E.W.C.J.: Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 14, e152 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Broderick, J.E., Schwartz, J.E., Shiffman, S., Hufford, M.R., Stone, A.A.: Signaling does not adequately improve diary compliance. Ann. Behav. Med. 26, 139–148 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S.: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2016). https://www.r-project.org

  24. Pagliari, C., Burton, C., McKinstry, B., Szentatotai, A., David, D., Serrano Blanco, A., Ferrini, L., Albertini, S., Castro, J.C., Estevez, S., Wolters, M.: Psychosocial implications of avatar use in supporting therapy for depression. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 181, 329–333 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burleson, W.: Affective learning companions: strategies for empathetic agents with real-time multimodal affective sensing to foster meta-cognitive and meta-affective approaches to learning, motivation, and perseverance (2006). http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37404

  26. van Ballegooijen, W., Ruwaard, J., Karyotaki, E., Ebert, D.D., Smit, J.H., Riper, H.: Reactivity to smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment of depressive symptoms (MoodMonitor): protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 16, 359 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Provoost .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Provoost, S., Ruwaard, J., Neijenhuijs, K., Bosse, T., Riper, H. (2018). Mood Mirroring with an Embodied Virtual Agent: A Pilot Study on the Relationship Between Personalized Visual Feedback and Adherence. In: Bajo, J., et al. Highlights of Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Complexity: The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 887. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94779-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94779-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94778-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94779-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics