Skip to main content

Introduction to Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing

Part of the book series: Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing ((MASP))

Abstract

The topic of this book is the theory and application of signal processing in underwater acoustics. The majority of applications in underwater acoustics can be described as remote sensing where an electro-mechanical system exploits acoustic signals underwater to perform inference related to an object of interest. The most recognized application is sonar (sound only navigation and ranging) for which the stated purpose is navigation and ranging (i.e., determining the distance or range from the sonar platform to an object of interest). The techniques by which underwater measurements of acoustic pressure are converted into navigation and ranging information are what comprise the signal-processing component of a sonar system. In this chapter, underwater acoustic signal processing is introduced according to the more general detection, classification, localization, and tracking (DCLT) paradigm. Common applications of underwater acoustic signal processing are described along with specific examples of signals of interest and each of the topics in the DCLT paradigm. The chapter is concluded with an explanation of how this book is organized, who the intended audience is, and how it might be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The choice of the adjective acoustic or acoustical is made following the paradigm of [2].

  2. 2.

    Acknowledgement: CTBTO [6] with gratitude to Drs. G. Haralabus, M. Zampolli, P. Nielsen, and A. Brouwer for their assistance in identifying, accessing, and interpreting the data.

  3. 3.

    Acknowledgement: CTBTO [6] with gratitude to Drs. G. Haralabus, M. Zampolli, P. Nielsen, and A. Brouwer for their assistance in identifying, accessing, and interpreting the data.

  4. 4.

    Acknowledgement: NURC Clutter JRP [12] with gratitude to Dr. P. Nielsen (scientist in charge, Clutter 2007 Experiment) and Dr. C. Holland (ARL/PSU) who led this particular investigation.

  5. 5.

    Acknowledgment with gratitude to Prof. S. Parks, Biology Dept., Syracuse University, who acquired the data under funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and a Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) Canada permit.

  6. 6.

    Acknowledgement: NURC Clutter JRP [12] with gratitude to Dr. P. Nielsen (scientist in charge, Clutter 2007 Experiment).

  7. 7.

    Acknowledgement: NURC Clutter JRP [12] with gratitude to Dr. P. Nielsen (scientist in charge, Clutter 2009 Experiment) and Dr. P. Hines, Mr. J. Scrutton, and Mr. S. Murphy (DRDC) who designed and led this particular investigation, collated and labeled the echoes.

  8. 8.

    Acknowledgement: NURC Clutter JRP [12] with gratitude to Dr. P. Nielsen (scientist in charge, Clutter 2007 Experiment).

  9. 9.

    More properly, a conical angle is estimated. The bearing is obtained, subject to a left/right ambiguity, by assuming the line array is horizontal and restricting the solution to the horizontal plane.

  10. 10.

    Acknowledgement: NURC Clutter JRP [12] with gratitude to Dr. P. Nielsen (scientist in charge, Clutter 2009 Experiment) and Dr. P. Hines, Mr. J. Scrutton, and Mr. S. Murphy (DRDC) who designed and led this particular investigation, collated and labeled the echoes.

References

  1. M. Denny, Blip, Ping & Buzz: Making Sense of Radar and Sonar (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. F.V. Hunt, Acoustic vs acoustical. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27(5), 975–976 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.W. Lawrence, P. Grenard, Hydroacoustic monitoring system for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, in OCEANS ’98 Conference Proceedings, vol. 2 (1998), pp. 694–697

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.W. Lawrence, Acoustic monitoring of the global ocean for the CTBT, in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Australian Acoustical Society (2004), pp. 455–459

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.K. Prior, D.J. Brown, G. Haralabus, J. Stanley, Long-term monitoring of ambient noise at CTBTO hydrophone stations, in Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics (2012), pp. 1018–1025

    Google Scholar 

  6. Acknowledgement: The author thanks and acknowledges the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO; https://www.ctbto.org/specials/vdec/) for providing access to the data used to produce these figures. The CTBTO is not responsible for the views of the author

  7. W.H. Munk, R.C. Spindel, A. Baggeroer, T.G. Birdsall, The Heard Island feasibility test. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96(4), 2330–2342 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R.J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, 3rd edn. (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.W.L. Au, M.C. Hastings, Principles of Marine Bioacoustics (Springer, Berlin, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.S. Matoza, D. Fee, M.A. Garcés, J.M. Seiner, P.A. Ramón, M.A.H. Hedlin, Infrasonic jet noise from volcanic eruptions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36(L08303), 1–5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.S. Matoza, D. Fee, The inaudible rumble of volcanic eruptions. Acoust. Today 14(1), 17–25 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Acknowledgement: These data were made possible by funding from the Office of Naval Research (Codes 321US and 322OA) and the CLUTTER Joint Research Project (JRP), including as Participants the NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC), Pennsylvania State University—ARL-PSU (USA), Defence Research and Development Canada—DRDC-A (CAN), and the Naval Research Laboratory—NRL (USA). Scientist in charge: Dr. P. Nielsen

    Google Scholar 

  13. S.E. Parks, A. Searby, A. Célérier, M.P. Johnson, D.P. Nowacek, P.L. Tyack, Sound production behavior of individual North Atlantic right whales: implications for passive acoustic monitoring. Endanger. Species Res. 15, 63–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W.S. Burdic, Underwater Acoustic System Analysis, 2nd edn. (Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.O. Nielsen, Sonar Signal Processing (Artech House, Inc., Norwood, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.A. Winder, Underwater sound, a review: Part II-Sonar system technology. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 22(5), 291–332 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W.C. Knight, R.G. Pridham, S.M. Kay, Digital signal processing for sonar. Proc. IEEE 69(11), 1451–1506 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J.C. Hassab, Underwater Signal and Data Processing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Bar-Shalom, X.R. Li, T. Kirubarajan, Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. J.V. Candy, Model-Based Signal Processing (Wiley, New York, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Bar-Shalom, P.K. Willett, X. Tian, Tracking and Data Fusion: A Handbook of Algorithms (YBS Publishing, Storrs, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. L.D. Stone, R.L. Streit, T.L. Corwin, K.L. Bell, Bayesian Multiple Target Tracking, 2nd edn. (Artech House, Norwood, 2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. C.M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer Science, New York, 2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning (Springer, Berlin, 2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. K. Fukunaga, Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2nd edn. (Academic, Boston, 1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. S.C. Nardone, V.J. Aidala, Observability criteria for bearings-only target motion analysis. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-17(2), 162–166 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. V.J. Aidala, S.E. Hammel, Utilization of modified polar coordinates for bearings-only tracking. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 28(3), 283–294 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R.E. Kalman, A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans. ASME—J. Basic Eng. 82(Series D), 35–45 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R.E. Kalman, R.S. Bucy, New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Trans. ASME—J. Basic Eng. 96, 95–108 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. A.B. Carlson, Communication Systems (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  31. S.M. Murphy, P.C. Hines, Examining the robustness of automated aural classification of active sonar echoes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135(2), 626–636 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abraham, D.A. (2019). Introduction to Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing. In: Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92983-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92983-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92981-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92983-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics