Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations ((PPCE,volume 6))

Abstract

In this book we argue that whistleblowing is crucial for democracy because it contributes to institutional transparency and is a safeguard against the potential abuse of government and corporate power. Its motivating idea is that whistleblowing is a form of civil dissent, that is a conscientious act against the corporate and public powers when they endanger the public interest of democratic communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Whether a normative theory of justice should be ideal or instead account for the non-ideal circumstances of its implementation is an issue many authors have discussed in recent years. On one account, theories of justice should have an aspirational aim, for their conceptual function is not to recommend how people and institutions should behave, but to define the standards through which people and institutions can be judged, and possibly improved (see Estlund 2014) . On a different account, the aim of ideal theories is not aspirational, let alone ‘realistic,’ but conceptual: to establish principles of justice independently from their practical goals, where principles do not depend on facts of the matter concerning human behavior (see Cohen 2003). When the problem concerns the concept of democracy , it seems difficult to imagine a purely conceptual model of democracy that does not have any practical goal. In this book, we will leave aside the debate on ideal and non-ideal theory to focus instead on standards of judgment for actual governmental practices.

  2. 2.

    See for instance Christiano (2008) who defends an interpretation along these lines.

References

  • Brettschneider, Corey. 2007. Democratic Rights. The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality. Democratic Authority and Its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Gerald A. 2003. Facts and Principles. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3): 211–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, David. 2014. Utopopobia. Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2): 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Santoro, D., Kumar, M. (2018). Introduction. In: Speaking Truth to Power - A Theory of Whistleblowing. Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90723-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics