Skip to main content

Luting, Cements and Bonding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Extra-Coronal Restorations

Part of the book series: BDJ Clinician’s Guides ((BDJCG))

  • 2460 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will emphasise the need to:

  • Appreciate why conventionally cemented extra-coronal restorations require preparations with retentive axial walls (minimally tapered and sufficiently long)

  • Avoid creating a thick lute between a preparation and the inner surface of a restoration

  • Ensure your technician facilitates seating of the restoration by die spacing, venting the crown or programming a lute space using CAD/CAM

  • Be familiar with surface treatments which can enhance resin bonding to tooth structure and restorative materials

  • Be familiar with resin bonding agents, their uses and limitations

  • Choose a luting agent which is appropriate to the situation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. von Fraunhofer JA. Adhesion and cohesion. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:951324.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kious AR, Roberts HW, Brackett WW. Film thicknesses of recently introduced luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101:189–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Diaz-Arnold AM, Williams VD, Aquilino SA. The effect of film thickness on the tensile bond strength of a prosthodontic adhesive. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:614–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu B, Lu C, Wu Y, Zhang X, Arola D, Zhang D. The effects of adhesive type and thickness on stress distribution in molars restored with all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont. 2011;20:35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res. 1991;70:880–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunne SM, Millar BJ. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Br Dent J. 1993;175:317–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D’Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98:193–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shahrbaf S, vanNoort R, Mirzakouchaki B, Ghassemieh E, Martin N. Effect of the crown design and interface lute parameters on the stress-state of a machined crown-tooth system: a finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2013;29:e123–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobsen PH, Wakefieldt AJ, O’Doherty DM, Rees JS. The effect of preparation height and taper on cement lute stress: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2006;14:151–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehl C, Harder S, Steiner M, Vollrath O, Kern M. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:618–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Osman SA, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Film thickness and rheological properties of luting agents for crown cementation. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2006;14:23–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pilo R, Cardash HS. In vivo retrospective study of cement thickness under crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:621–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sener I, Turker B, Valandro LF, Ozcan M. Marginal gap, cement thickness, and microleakage of 2 zirconia crown systems luted with glass ionomer and MDP-based cements. Gen Dent. 2014;62:67–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wassell RW, Gagliano G. Effects of adhesive fixed prosthesis retainer design on resultant resin luting agent thickness. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:479–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiskott HW, Krebs C, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC. Compressive and tensile zones in the cement interface of full crowns: a technical note on the concept of resistance. J Prosthodont. 1999;8:80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater. 2012;28:467–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiskott HW, Belser UC, Scherrer SS. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:255–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Motisuki C, Monti Lima L, Emi Sanabe M, Jacques P, Santos-Pinto L. Evaluation of the microtensile bond strength of composite resin restoration in dentin prepared with different sizes of aluminum oxide particles, using the air abrasion system. Minerva Stomatol. 2006;55:611–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Two pre-treatments for bonding to non-carious cervical root dentin. Am J Dent. 2015;28:362–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Waveren Hogervorst WL, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: a quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;117:20–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:299–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lakatos S, Rominu M, Negrutiu M, Florita Z. The microleakage between alloy and polymeric materials in veneer crowns. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:295–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Falkensammer F, Arnetzl GV, Wildburger A, Krall C, Freudenthaler J. Influence of different conditioning methods on immediate and delayed dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Batista GR, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Caneppele TM, Rocha Gomes Torres C. Effects of different surface treatments on composite repairs. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:421–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Robin C, Scherrer SS, Wiskott HW, de Rijk WG, Belser UC. Weibull parameters of composite resin bond strengths to porcelain and noble alloy using the Rocatec system. Dent Mater. 2002;18:389–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimoe S, Tanoue N, Yanagida H, Atsuta M, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Comparative strength of metal-ceramic and metal-composite bonds after extended thermocycling. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:689–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eder A, Wickens J. Surface treatment of gold alloys for resin adhesion. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:35–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koch T, Peutzfeldt A, Malinovskii V, Flury S, Haner R, Lussi A. Temporary zinc oxide-eugenol cement: eugenol quantity in dentin and bond strength of resin composite. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013;121:363–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Carvalho EM, Carvalho CN, Loguercio AD, Lima DM, Bauer J. Effect of temporary cements on the microtensile bond strength of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cement. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:762–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaufman EG, Colin L, Schlagel E, Coelho DH. Factors influencing the retention of cemented gold castings: the cementing medium. J Prosthet Dent. 1966;16:731–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lorton L, Moore BK, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Rheology of luting cements. J Dent Res. 1980;59:1486–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eisenburger M, Addy M, Rossbach A. Acidic solubility of luting cements. J Dent. 2003;31:137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Langeland K, Langeland LK. Pulp reactions to crown preparation, impression, temporary crown fixation, and permanent cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 1965;15:129–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Bacterial growth and pulpal changes under inlays cemented with zinc phosphate cement and Epoxylite CBA 9080. J Prosthet Dent. 1974;31:556–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Pulpal reaction to polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate cements used with inlays in deep cavity preparations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977;94:308–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Going RE, Mitchem JC. Cements for permanent luting: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975;91:107–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972;132:133–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith DC, Ruse ND. Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986;112:654–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller HG, Strub JR. Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:159–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1995;8:59–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Alghilan MA, Cook NB, Platt JA, Eckert GJ, Hara AT. Susceptibility of restorations and adjacent enamel/dentine to erosion under different salivary flow conditions. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1476–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Millet C, Duprez JP, Khoury C, Morgon L, Richard B. Interdisciplinary care for a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2015;24:424–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Emamieh S, Ghasemi A, Torabzadeh H. Hygroscopic expansion of aesthetic restorative materials: one-year report. J Dent (Tehran). 2011;8:25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Leevailoj C, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Moore BK. In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:699–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ehlers V, Kampf G, Stender E, Willershausen B, Ernst CP. Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113:609–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns. Dent Mater. 2015;31:1363–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Wimmer J, Lang R, Kolbeck C, Burgers R, et al. Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: a prospective clinical trial begun 2003. Dent Mater. 2009;25:601–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Manuja N, Nagpal R, Pandit IK. Dental adhesion: mechanism, techniques and durability. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;36:223–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. Meta-analysis of the influence of bonding parameters on the clinical outcome of tooth-colored cervical restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17:391–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Krithikadatta J. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary dentin bonding agents. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13:173–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Boksman L, Swift EJ. Current usage of glutaraldehyde/HEMA. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23:410–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ritter AV, Swift EJ, Yamauchi M. Effects of phosphoric acid and glutaraldehyde-HEMA on dentin collagen. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109:348–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Christensen G. Dr. Gordon Christensen’s favorite selective-etch steps. [cited February 2018]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/y6uusebw.

  56. Makkar S, Malhotra N. Self-adhesive resin cements: a new perspective in luting technology. Dent Update. 2013;40:758–60, 763–754, 767–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2013;29:221–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Turp V, Sen D, Tuncelli B, Özcan M. Adhesion of 10-MDP containing resin cements to dentin with and without the etch-and-rinse technique. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5:226–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2004;20:963–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. de Souza G, Braga RR, Cesar PF, Lopes GC. Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015;23:358–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Åberg CH, Dijken JWV, Olofsson AL. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994;52:140–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Awliya W, Oden A, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME. Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56:9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. O’Rourke B, Walls AW, Wassell RW. Radiographic detection of overhangs formed by resin composite luting agents. J Dent. 1995;23:353–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. White SN, Kipnis V. Effect of adhesive luting agents on the marginal seating of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. White SN, Yu Z, Kipnis V. Effect of seating force on film thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:476–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Qvist V, Stoltze K, Qvist J. Human pulp reactions to resin restorations performed with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand. 1989;47:253–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17:144–54; discussion 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent. 1992;17:13–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Abu Nawareg MM, Zidan AZ, Zhou J, Chiba A, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Adhesive sealing of dentin surfaces in vitro: a review. Am J Dent. 2015;28:321–32.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Grajower R, Zuberi Y, Lewinstein I. Improving the fit of crowns with die spacers. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:555–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wu JC, Wilson PR. Optimal cement space for resin luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7:209–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wilson PR. The effect of die spacing on crown deformation and seating time. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6:397–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wilson PR. Effect of increasing cement space on cementation of artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:560–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wilson PR, Goodkind RJ, Delong R, Sakaguchi R. Deformation of crowns during cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:601–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Carter SM, Wilson PR. The effect of die-spacing on crown retention. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:21–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lee HH, Ibbetson RJ. Effect of die relief on the seating, fit and retention of cast gold crowns cemented on human teeth. Singapore Dent J. 2000;23:6–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kamposiora P, Papavasilious G, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Finite element analysis estimates of cement microfracture under complete veneer crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:435–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Tan K, Ibbetson R. The effect of cement volume on crown seating. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:445–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Wilson PR. Low force cementation. J Dent. 1996;24:269–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Walmsley AD, Lumley PJ. Applying composite luting agent ultrasonically: a successful alternative. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126:1125–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Gavelis JR, Morency JD, Riley ED, Sozio RB. The effect of various finish line preparations on the marginal seal and occlusal seat of full crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45:138–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Field .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Field, J., Barbour, M., Wassell, R. (2019). Luting, Cements and Bonding. In: Wassell, R., Nohl, F., Steele, J., Walls, A. (eds) Extra-Coronal Restorations. BDJ Clinician’s Guides. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79093-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79093-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79092-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79093-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics