Skip to main content

A Fitness Landscape View on the Tuning of an Asynchronous Master-Worker EA for Nuclear Reactor Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Evolution (EA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10764))

Abstract

In the context of the introduction of intermittent renewable energies, we propose to optimize the main variables of the control rods of a nuclear power plant to improve its capability to load-follow. The design problem is a black-box combinatorial optimization problem with expensive evaluation based on a multi-physics simulator. Therefore, we use a parallel asynchronous master-worker Evolutionary Algorithm scaling up to thousand computing units. One main issue is the tuning of the algorithm parameters. A fitness landscape analysis is conducted on this expensive real-world problem to show that it would be possible to tune the mutation parameters according to the low-cost estimation of the fitness landscape features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alba, E., Tomassini, M.: Parallelism and evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(5), 443–462 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnaud, G., Do, J.-M., Lautard, J.-J., Baudron, A.-M., Douce, S.: Selection combinatory algorithm for loading pattern design of light water reactor with two levels of heterogeneity. In: Proceedings of ICAPP (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daolio, F., Liefooghe, A., Verel, S., Aguirre, H., Tanaka, K.: Problem features vs. algorithm performance on rugged multi-objective combinatorial fitness landscapes. Evolutionary Computation (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Moura Meneses, A.A., Gambardella, L.M., Schirru, R.: A new approach for heuristics-guided search in the in-core fuel management optimization. Prog. Nucl. Energy 52, 339–351 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubreuil, M., Gagne, C., Parizeau, M.: Analysis of a master-slave architecture for distributed evolutionary computations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 36, 229–235 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dumont, O.: Ademe energie 2030: production d’énergies renouvelables. Technical report, Ademe (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eiben, A.E., Michalewicz, Z., Schoenauer, M., Smith, J.E.: Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. In: Lobo, F.G., Lima, C.F., Michalewicz, Z. (eds.) Parameter Setting in Evolutionary Algorithms. SCI, vol. 54, pp. 19–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69432-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Grard, H.: Physique, fonctionnement et sûreté des REP. EDP Sciences (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hordijk, W.: A measure of landscapes. Evol. Comput. 4(4), 335–360 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, J.H., Park, S.H., Na, M.G.: Design of a model predictive load-following controller by discrete optimization of control rod speed for PWRs. Ann. Nucl. Energy 71, 343–351 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liefooghe, A., Derbel, B., Verel, S., Aguirre, H., Tanaka, K.: Towards landscape-aware automatic algorithm configuration: preliminary experiments on neutral and rugged landscapes. In: Hu, B., López-Ibáñez, M. (eds.) EvoCOP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10197, pp. 215–232. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55453-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lokhov, A.: Technical and economic aspect of load following with nuclear power plants. In: Nuclear Energy Agency. OECD, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  13. López-Ibáñez, M., Dubois-Lacoste, J., Stützle, T., Birattari, M.: The Rpackageirace package, iterated race for automatic algorithm configuration. Technical Report TR/IRIDIA/2011-004, IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muniglia, M., Do, J.-M., Le Pallec, J.-C., Grard, H., Verel, S.V., David, S.: A multi-physics PWR model for the load following. In: ICAPP (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Na, M.G., Hwang, I.J., Lee, Y.J.: Design of a fuzzy model predictive power controller for pressurized water reactors. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53(3), 1504–1514 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pereira, C.M., Lapa, C.M.: Coarse-grained parallel genetic algorithm applied to a nuclear reactor core design optimization problem. Ann. Nucl. Energy 30, 555–565 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rice, J.R.: The algorithm selection problem. Adv. Comput. 15, 65–118 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sacco, W.F., De Oliveira, C.R., Pereira, C.M.: Two stochastic optimization algorithms applied to nuclear reactor core design. Prog. Nucl. Energy 48, 525–539 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sacco, W.F., Lapa, C.M., Pereira, C.M., Filho, H.A.: A metropolis algorithm applied to a nuclear power plant auxiliary feedwater system surveillance tests policy optimization. Prog. Nucl. Energy 50, 15–21 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schneider, D., Dolci, F., Gabriel, F., Palau, J.-M.: Apollo3\(^{\textregistered }\): CEA/DEN deterministic multi-purpose code for reactor physics analysis. In: PHYSOR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stadler, P.F.: Fitness landscapes. In: Lässig, M., Valleriani, A. (eds.) Biological Evolution and Statistical Physics. LNP, vol. 585, pp. 183–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45692-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanneschi, L., Tomassini, M., Collard, P., Vérel, S., Pirola, Y., Mauri, G.: A comprehensive view of fitness landscapes with neutrality and fitness clouds. In: Ebner, M., O’Neill, M., Ekárt, A., Vanneschi, L., Esparcia-Alcázar, A.I. (eds.) EuroGP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4445, pp. 241–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71605-1_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Weinberger, E.D.: Local properties of Kauffman’s NK model, a tuneably rugged energy landscape. Phys. Rev. A 44, 6399–6413 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wessing, S., Rudolph, G., Menges, D.A.: Comparing asynchronous and synchronous parallelization of the SMS-EMOA. In: Handl, J., Hart, E., Lewis, P.R., López-Ibáñez, M., Ochoa, G., Paechter, B. (eds.) PPSN 2016. LNCS, vol. 9921, pp. 558–567. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Verel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Muniglia, M., Verel, S., Le Pallec, JC., Do, JM. (2018). A Fitness Landscape View on the Tuning of an Asynchronous Master-Worker EA for Nuclear Reactor Design. In: Lutton, E., Legrand, P., Parrend, P., Monmarché, N., Schoenauer, M. (eds) Artificial Evolution. EA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10764. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78133-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78133-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78132-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78133-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics