Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

3D Visual Content Creation, Coding and Delivery pp 267–297Cite as

Quality of Experience and Quality of Service Metrics for 3D Content

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Signals and Communication Technology ((SCT))

Abstract

Traditionally, the quality of a multimedia system was mainly assessed through the evaluation of its Quality of Service (QoS) that is by evaluating system parameters such as bandwidth, latency, jitter, throughput, transmission delay, availability, etc. However, these metrics often failed to capture the actual end-user perceived quality, which has prompted the development of the construct of Quality of Experience (QoE), widely understood as an interaction of the technical features of multimedia systems with perceptual, and cognitive/emotional factors involved in the interpretation of those features by users. This chapter addresses the open issues in the field of QoS and QoE assessments. First, the perceptual characteristics of the multiview content are analyzed, and then a survey on the existing approaches for QoS and QoE estimation is performed. The analysis is then focused on the subjective aspects of QoE assessment, by describing the standard methodologies currently used and new trends based on human factors research. Finally, the chapter offers a few guidelines for future research directions in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liotta, A.: The cognitive NET is coming. IEEE Spectr 50(8), 26–31 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Torres Vega, M., Zou, S., Mocanu, D.C., Tangdiongga, E., Koonen, A.M.J., Liotta, A.: End-to-end performance evaluation in high-speed wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 2014 10th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), 17–21 Nov 2014, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (pp. 344–347). Piscataway: IEEE Service Center (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Le Callet, P., Moeller, S., Perkins, A. (eds.) Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience. In: COST Action IC 1003, Laussane, Switzerland (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agboma, F., Liotta, A.: Quality of experience management in mobile content delivery systems. J. Telecommun. Syst. (special issue on the Quality of Experience issues in Multimedia Provision) 49(1) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Agboma, F., Liotta, A.: QoE-aware QoS management. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, 24–26 Nov 2008, Linz (Austria)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mocanu, D.C., Liotta, A., Ricci, A., Torres Vega, M., Exarchakos, G.: When does lower bitrate give higher quality in modern video services? In: Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS’14) 5–9 May 2014, Krakow, Poland, IEEE, Piscataway, pp. 1–5 (2014

    Google Scholar 

  7. Agboma, F., Liotta, A.: Addressing user expectations in mobile content delivery. Mobile Inf. Syst. 3(3–4), 153–164 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agboma, F., Smy, M., Liotta, A. “QoE analysis of a peer-to-peer television systems”. In: Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on Telecommunications, Networks and Systems. July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  9. Agboma, F., Liotta, A.: Quality of experience management in mobile content delivery systems. Telecommun. Syst. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Exarchakos, G., Druda, L., Menkovski, V., Liotta, A.: Network analysis on Skype end-to-end video quality. Int. J. Pervasive Comput. Commun. 11(1) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Exarchakos, G., Menkovski, V., Liotta, A.: Can Skype be used beyond video calling?. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia (MOMM11), ACM, 2011/12/5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liotta, A., Druda, L., Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G.: Quality of experience management for video streams: the case of Skype. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia, ACM, 2012/12/3

    Google Scholar 

  13. Exarchakos, G., Druda, L., Menkovski, V., Bellavista, P., Liotta, A.: Skype resilience to high motion videos. Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolution Inf. Process 11(03) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A., Cuadra Sánchez, A.: Measuring quality of experience on a commercial mobile TV platform. In: 2010 Second International Conferences on Advances in Multimedia (MMEDIA), Athens (Greece), IEEE, 13–19 June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  15. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A.: Adaptive testing for video quality assessment. In: Proceedings of Quality of Experience for Multimedia Content Sharing, Lisbon, Portugal, 29 June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  16. Torres Vega, M., Sguazzo, V., Mocanu, D.C., Liotta, A.: An experimental survey of no-reference video quality assessment methods. Int. J. Pervasive Comput. Commun. 12(1) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liotta, A., Mocanu, D.C., Menkovski, V., Cagnetta, L., Exarchakos, G.: Instantaneous video quality assessment for lightweight devices. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia, ACM, 2013/12/2

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mocanu, D.C., Santandrea, G., Cerroni, W., Callegati, F., Liotta, A.: Network performance assessment with quality of experience benchmarks. In: 2014 10th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), IEEE, 17 Nov 2014

    Google Scholar 

  19. Winkler, S., Mohandas, P.: The evolution of video quality measurement: from PSNR to hybrid metrics. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 54(3), 660–668 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pinson, M.H., Wolf, S.: A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 50(3), 312–322 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chikkerur, S., Sundaram, V., Reisslein, M., Karam, L.J.: Objective video quality assessment methods: a classification, review, and performance comparison. TBC 57(2), 165–182 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Torres Vega, M., Sguazzo, V., Mocanu, D.C., Liotta, A.: Accuracy of no-reference quality metrics in network-impaired video streams. In: 13th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, 11–13 Dec 2015, ACM, Brussels, Belgium Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  24. https://www.tue.nl/en/university/departments/electrical-engineering/research/research-groups/electro-optical-communications-eco/research/network-management-and-control/datasets/network-impaired-video-dataset/

  25. Seshadrinathan, K., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A.C., Cormack, L.K.: Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video. Trans. Image Process. 19(6), 1427–1441 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., Talwalkar, A.: Foundations of Machine Learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Menkovski, V., Oredope, A., Liotta, A., Cuadra-Sanchez, A.: Optimized online learning for QoE prediction. In: Proceedings of the 21st Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2009/10/9

    Google Scholar 

  28. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A.: Online QoE prediction. Second International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), IEEE, June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  29. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A., Cuadra Sánchez, A.: Estimations and remedies for quality of experience in multimedia streaming. In: Third International Conference on Advances in Human-Oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies and Services (CENTRIC), IEEE, 2010/8/22

    Google Scholar 

  30. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A.: Online learning for quality of experience management. In: The Annual Machine Learning Conference of Belgium and the Netherlands (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A.: Machine learning approach for quality of experience aware networks. In: 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCOS), IEEE, 2010/11/24

    Google Scholar 

  32. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A.: The value of relative quality in video delivery. J. Mobile Multimed. 7(3), 151–162 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A., Cuadra Sánchez, A.: Quality of experience models for multimedia streaming. In: Advancing the Next-Generation of Mobile Computing: Emerging Technologies: Emerging Technologies. IGI Global (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Menkovski, V., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A.: Tackling the sheer scale of subjective QoE. In: International ICST Mobile Multimedia Communications Conference, vol. 29. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Menkovski, V., Liotta, A.: Adaptive psychometric scaling for video quality assessment. Signal Process. Image Commun. 27(8) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bertone, F., Menkovski, V., Liotta, A.: Adaptive P2P streaming. In: Streaming Media with Peer-to-Peer Networks. IGI Global (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Menkovski, V., Liotta, A.: Intelligent control for adaptive video streaming. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Jan 2013

    Google Scholar 

  38. Torres Vega, M., Mocanu, D.C., Barresi, R., Fortino, G., Liotta, A.: Cognitive streaming on android devices. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM’15), 11–15 May 2015, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 1316–1321. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Torres Vega, M., Giordano, E., Mocanu, D.C., Tjondronegoro, D., Liotta, A.: Cognitive no-reference video quality assessment for mobile streaming services. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMex), 26–29 May 2015, Pilos, Messinia, Greece, pp. 1–6. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mocanu, D.C., Exarchakos, G., Bou Ammar, H., Liotta, A.: Reduced reference image quality assessment via Boltzmann machines. In: IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), 11 May 2015. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mocanu, D.C., Exarchakos, G., Liotta, A.: Deep learning for objective quality assessment of 3D images. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 27 Oct 2014

    Google Scholar 

  42. ITU-R BT.2021, Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3DTV systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Winkler, S., Min, D.: Stereo/multiview picture quality: overview and recent advances. Sig. Process. Image Commun. 28(10), 1358–1373 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu, C., Li, S.: Depth image based view synthesis: new insights and perspectives on hole generation and filling. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 62(1), 82–93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Scharstein, D., Szeliski, R.: A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 47(1), 7–42 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu, W., Chen, X., Yang, J., Wu, Q.: Robust color guided depth map restoration. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(1), 315–327 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Lei, J., Li, L., Yue, H., Wu, F., Ling, N., Hou, C.: Depth map super-resolution considering view synthesis quality. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(4), 1732–1745 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Nezveda, M., Brosch, N., Seitner, F., Gelautz, M.: Depth map post-processing for depth-image-based rendering: a user study. In: Proceedings of SPIE 9011, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXV, 90110K (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2039771

  49. Bosc, E., Pepion, R., Le Callet, P., Pressigout, M., Morin, L.: Reliability of 2D quality assessment methods for synthesized views evaluation in stereoscopic viewing conditions. In: Proceedings of 3DTV-Con, pp. 1–4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/3dtv.2012.6365457

  50. Seitner, F., Nezveda, M., Gelautz, M., Braun, G., Kapeller, C., Zellinger, W., Moser, B.: Trifocal system for high-quality inter-camera mapping and virtual view synthesis. In: Proceedings of International Conference on 3D Imaging (IC3D), 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ic3d.2015.7391819

  51. Muddala, S., Olsson, R., Sjöström, M.: Spatio-temporal consistent depth-image-based rendering using layered depth image and inpainting. EURASIP J. Image Video Process. 9(1), 1–19 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Buyssens, P., Le Meur, O., Daisy, M., Tschumperlé, D., Lézoray, O.: Depth-guided disocclusion inpainting of synthesized RGB-D images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(2), 525–538 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Bosc, E., Pépion, R., Le Callet, P., Köppel, M., Ndjiki-Nya, P., Pressigout, M., Morin, L.: Towards a new quality metric for 3-D synthesized view assessment. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sign. Proces. 5(7), 1332–1343 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rittler, T., Nezveda, M., Seitner, F., Gelautz, M.: Depth-guided disocclusion inpainting for novel view synthesis. In: Proceedings of OAGM&ARW Joint Workshop Vision, Automation and Robotics, pp. 160–164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3217/978-3-85125-524-9-34

  55. Wang, J., Cohen, M.: Image and video matting: a survey. Found. Trends® Comput. Graph. Vis. 3(2), 97–175 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Brosch, N., Nezveda, M., Gelautz, M., Seitner, F.: Efficient quality enhancement of disparity maps based on alpha matting. In: Proceedings of SPIE 9011, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXV, 90110M (2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2035361

  57. Dumic, E., Grgic, S., Bermejo, D.J., Cruz, L.A.S.: benchmark of state of the art objective measures for 3D stereoscopic video quality assessment on the nantes database. In: Proceedings of the 56th International Symposium ELMAR-2014, pp. 119–123 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Urvoy, M., Barkowsky, M., Cousseau, R., Koudota, Y., Ricorde, V., Le Callet, P., Gutierrez, J., Garcia, N.: NAMA3DS1-COSPAD1: subjective video quality assessment database on coding conditions introducing freely available high quality 3D stereoscopic sequences. In: Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pp. 109–114 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bosc, E., Le Callet, P., Morin, L., Pressigout, M.: Visual quality assessment of synthesized views in the context of 3DTV. In: Zhu, C., Zhao, Y., Yu, L., Tanimoto, M. (eds.) 3D-TV system with Depth-Image-Based Rendering, pp. 439–473. Springer, New York (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Hewage, C.T.E.R., Worrall, S.T., Dogan, S., Kondoz, A.M.: Prediction of stereoscopic video quality using objective quality models of 2-D video. Electron. Lett. 44(16), 963–965 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Benoit, A., Le Callet, P., Campisi, P., Cousseau, R.: Quality assessment of stereoscopic images. EURASIP J. Image Video Process. 2008, Article ID 659024, 13 p (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Aflaki, P., Hannuksela, M.M., Hakala, J., Häkkinenb, J., Gabbouj, M.: Estimation of subjective quality for mixed-resolution stereoscopic video. In: 3DTV Conference: The True Vision—Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON), pp. 1–4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bosc, E., Pepion, R., Le Callet, P., Pressigout, M., Morin, L.: Reliability of 2D quality assessment methods for synthesized views evaluation in stereoscopic viewing conditions. In: 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision—Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON), pp. 1–4 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wang, K., Barkowsky, M., Brunnström, K., Sjöström, M., Cousseau, R., Le Callet, P.: Perceived 3D TV transmission quality assessment: multi-laboratory results using absolute category rating on quality of experience scale. IEEE Trans. Broadcasting 58(4) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Conze, P.H., Robert, P., Morin, L.: Objective view synthesis quality assessment. In: Proceedings of SPIE, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, Feb 2012

    Google Scholar 

  66. Battisti, F., Bosc, E., Carli, M., Le Callet, P., Perugia, S.: Objective image quality assessment of 3D synthesized views. Signal Process. Image Commun. 30, 78–88 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sandic-Stankovic, D., Kukolj, D., Le Callet, P.: DIBR synthesized image quality assessment based on morphological wavelets. International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience QoMEX, Costa Navarino, Greece, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sandic-Stankovic, D., Kukolj, D., Le Callet, P.: DIBR synthesized image quality assessment based on morphological pyramids. In: 3DTV-CON Immersive and Interactive 3D Media Experience Over Networks, Lisbon, July 2015

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ekmekcioglu, E., Worall, S.T., De Silva, D., Fernando, W.A.C., Kondoz, A.M.: Depth based perceptual quality assessment for synthesized camera viewpoints. In: International Conference on User Centric Media, Sept 2010

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pinson, M.H., Wolf, S.: A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality. IEEE Trans. Broadcasting 50(3), 312–322 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Oh, K.J., Yea, S., Vetro, A., Ho, Y.S.: Virtual view synthesis method and self evaluation metrics for free viewpoint television and 3D video. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Shahid Farid, M., Lucenteforte, M., Grangetto, M.: Objective quality metric for 3D virtual views. In: International Conference on Image processing, ICIP (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Solh, M., AlRegib, G.: MIQM: a novel multi-view images quality measure. The First International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QOMEX), San Diego, CA, 29–31 July (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shao, H., Cao, X., Er, G.: Objective quality assessment of depth image based rendering in 3DTV system. 3DTV-CON (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hanhart, P., Bosc, E., Le Callet, P., Ebrahimi, T.: Free-viewpoint video sequences: a new challenge for objective quality metrics. International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), Jakarta, Indonesia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Solh, M., AlRegib, G., Bauza, J.M.: 3VQM: a vision-based quality measure for DIBR-based 3D videos. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 1–6, July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  77. Song, R., Ko, H., Kuo, C.C.J.: MCL-3D: a database for stereoscopic image quality assessment using 2D-image-plus-depth source. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bosc, E., Battisti, F., Carli, M., Callet, P.L.: A wavelet-based image quality metric for the assessment of 3D synthesized views. In: Proceedings of SPIE 8648, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, Mar 2013

    Google Scholar 

  79. El-Yamany, N., Ugur, K., Hannuksela, Gabbouj, M.: Evaluation of depth compression and view synthesis distortions in multiview-video-plus-depth coding systems. In: 2DTV-CON (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Dumic, E., Grgic, S., Cruz, L.A.S., Assuncao, P.: Objective quality measures comparison of impaired 3D video sequences from the UC3D database. In: Proceedings of 3DTV-Conference 2014: In Pursuit of Next Generation 3D Display (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tikanmaki, A., Gotchev, A., Smolic, A., Miller, K.: Quality assessment of 3D video in rate allocation experiments. In: IEEE Symposium on Consumer Electronics, pp. 1–4, Apr 2008

    Google Scholar 

  82. Silva, D., Fernando, W., Worrall, S., Kondoz, A.: A novel depth map quality metric and its usage in depth map coding. In: 3DTV/Conference (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Dehkordi, A.B., Pourzad, M., Nasiopoulos, P.: A study on the relationship between depth map quality and the overall 3D video quality of experience. In: 3DTV-Conference (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Do, L., Zinger, S., de With, P.: Quality improving techniques for free-viewpoint DIBR. In: Proceedings of SPIE Stereoscopic displays and applications (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kooi, F.L., Toet, A.: Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays. Displays 25(2), 99–108 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Schneider, B., Moraglia, G., Jepson, A.: Binocular unmasking: An analog to binaural unmasking? Science 243(4897), 1479–1482 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Meesters, L.M., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Seuntiëns, P.J.: A survey of perceptual evaluations and requirements of three-dimensional TV. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 14(3), 381–391 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Lambooij, M.T., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Heynderickx, I.: Visual discomfort in stereoscopic displays: a review. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 6490 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  89. Ostrin, L.A., Glasser, A.: Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 30(7), 1435–1444 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Rushton, S.K., Riddell, P.M.: Developing visual systems and exposure to virtual reality and stereo displays: some concerns and speculations about the demands on accommodation and vergence. Appl. Ergon. 30(1), 69–78 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Babrow, A.S.: Theory and method in research on audience motives. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 32(4), 471–487 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Nisbett, R.E., Wilson, T.D.: Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84(3), 231 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Ravaja, N.: Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: review and recommendations. Media Psychol. 6(2), 193–235 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Pereda-Baños, A., Barreda-Ángeles, M.: On human information processing in information retrieval. In: NeuroIR’2015 13 Aug 2015, Santiago, Chile (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  95. Bonomi, M., Barreda-Ángeles, M., Battisti, F., Boato, G., Le Callet, P., Carli, M.: Towards QoE estimation of 3D contents through non-invasive methods. In: 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision-Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON), pp. 1–4. IEEE, July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  96. Kahneman, D.: Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Wickens, C.D.: Processing resources in attention, dual task performance, and workload assessment. Technical Report EPL-81–3/ONR-81-3, University of Illinois at Urbana (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Milán, E.G., González, A., Sanabria, D., Pereda, A., Hochel, M.: The nature of residual cost in regular switch response factors. Acta Physiol. 122(1), 45–57 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  99. Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., Cuthbert, B.N.: International affective picture system (IAPS): technical manual and affective ratings. In: NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, pp. 39–58 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  100. LeDoux, J.: Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron 73(4), 653–676 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Armony & LeDoux. In: Rees, A., Palmer, A.R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Auditory Science: The Auditory Brain, vol. 2, pp. 479–505. Oxford University Press, NY (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Larsson, P., Västfjäll, D.: Emotional and behavioural responses to auditory interfaces in commercial vehicles. Int. J. Veh. Noise Vib. 9(1–2), 75–95 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Vorderer, P., Steen, F.F., Chan, E.: Motivation. In: Bryant, J., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Psychology of entertainment, pp. 3–17. Laurence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Döveling, K., von Scheve, C., Konijn, E.A. (eds.): The Routledge handbook of emotions and mass media. Routledge, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Barreda-Ángeles, M., Pépion, R., Bosc, E., Le Callet, P., Pereda-Baños, A.: Exploring the effects of 3D visual discomfort on viewers’ emotions. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 753–757. IEEE, Oct 2014

    Google Scholar 

  106. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: The international affective digitized sounds (IADS-2): affective ratings of sounds and instruction manual. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, Technical Report. B-3 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. CSLI Publications and Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–18 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  108. Zillmann, D.: Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. J. Commun. 56(s1) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Zillmann, D.: Mechanisms of emotional reactivity to media entertainments. In: The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media, pp. 101–115 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  110. Vorderer, P.A., Hartmann, T.: Entertainment and enjoyment as media effects (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  111. Vorderer, P.: Audience involvement and program loyalty. Poetics 22(1–2), 89–98 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Urvoy, M., Barkowsky, M., Le Callet, P.: How visual fatigue and discomfort impact 3D-TV quality of experience: a comprehensive review of technological, psychophysical, and psychological factors. Ann. Telecommu. (annales des télécommunications) 68(11–12), 641–655

    Google Scholar 

  113. Clifford, C.W., Webster, M.A., Stanley, G.B., Stocker, A.A., Kohn, A., Sharpee, T.O., Schwartz, O.: Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects. Vis. Res. 47(25), 3125–3131 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Sanchez-Vives, M.V., Slater, M.: From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6(4), 332–339 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Minsky, M.: Telepresence (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  116. Peters, C., Pelachaud, C., Bevacqua, E., Mancini, M., Poggi, I.: A model of attention and interest using gaze behavior. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3661, pp. 229–240 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  117. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(1), 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Mason, M.F., Norton, M.I., Van Horn, J.D., Wegner, D.M., Grafton, S.T., Macrae, C.N.: Wandering minds: the default mode network and stimulus-independent thought. Science 315(5810), 393–395 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Arapakis, I., Barreda-Angeles, M., Pereda-Banos, A.: Interest as a proxy of engagement in news reading: spectral and entropy analyses of eeg activity patterns. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  120. Hendrix, C., Barfield, W.: Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 5(3), 274–289 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Shilling, R.D., Shinn-Cunningham, B.: Virtual auditory displays. In: Handbook of Virtual Environment Technology, pp. 65–92 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  122. Murray, C.D., Arnold, P., Thornton, B.: Presence accompanying induced hearing loss: Implications for immersive virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 9, 137–148 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Cengarle, G., Pereda-Baños, A.: The perception of masked sounds and reverberation in 3D versus 2D playback systems. In: Proceedings of 134th AES Convention, May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  124. Gorzel, M., Corrigan, D., Kearney, G., Squires, J., Boland, F.: Distance perception in virtual audio-visual environments. In: Proceedings of 25th AES UK Conference: Spatial Audio in Today’s 3D World. AES, UK (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  125. Silzle, A., George, S., Habets, E.A.P., Bachmann, T.: Investigation on the quality of 3D sound reproduction. In: Proceedings of ICSA, p. 334 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  126. Riecke, B.E., Väljamäe, A., Schulte-Pelkum, J.: Moving sounds enhance the visually-induced self-motion illusion (circular vection) in virtual reality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. (TAP) 6(2), 7 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eurecat, Barcelona, Spain

    Miguel Barreda-Ángeles & Alexandre Pereda-Baños

  2. University of Roma TRE, Rome, Italy

    Federica Battisti & Marco Carli

  3. University of Trento, Trento, Italy

    Giulia Boato

  4. Department of Electrical Engineering, University North, Varaždin, Croatia

    Emil Dumic

  5. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria

    Margrit Gelautz

  6. Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK

    Chaminda Hewage

  7. Unviersity of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

    Dragan Kukolj, Dragana Sandic & Vladimir Zlokolica

  8. University of Nantes, Nantes, France

    Patrick Le-Callet

  9. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Antonio Liotta & María Torres-Vega

  10. University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Cecilia Pasquini

  11. Kingston University London, London, UK

    Christos Politis

  12. Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Murat Tekalp

Authors
  1. Miguel Barreda-Ángeles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Federica Battisti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giulia Boato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marco Carli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emil Dumic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Margrit Gelautz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chaminda Hewage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dragan Kukolj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Patrick Le-Callet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Antonio Liotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Cecilia Pasquini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Alexandre Pereda-Baños
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Christos Politis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Dragana Sandic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Murat Tekalp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. María Torres-Vega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Vladimir Zlokolica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Barreda-Ángeles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Telecomunicações and Politécnico de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal

    Pedro Amado Assunção

  2. Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland

    Atanas Gotchev

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barreda-Ángeles, M. et al. (2019). Quality of Experience and Quality of Service Metrics for 3D Content. In: Assunção, P., Gotchev, A. (eds) 3D Visual Content Creation, Coding and Delivery. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77842-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77842-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77841-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77842-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation