Abstract
This chapter recovers the work of the preceding several chapters to demonstrate my attention to structure and procedure as key components of both Badiou’s and Deleuze’s ontological multiplicity. I discuss the prospects for ‘other lineages’ in which to take up this investigation, including the discussions in Chapter 5 concerning Badiou’s relationships to Heidegger and Kant. Knox Peden (Spinoza Contra Phenomenology: French Rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2014) uses an entanglement with Heidegger to propose ways in which Deleuze’s alternative reinforces his deep Spinozist commitments; this recognition extends the frontier of the Badiou-Deleuze engagement beyond the boundary I identify in Kant’s notion of the manifold. I conclude by addressing the critique of multiplicity in Badiou’s review of Deleuze’s The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. This engagement offers an opportunity to consider the foundation of ontological inquiry not in multiplicity, but the decision or commitment to dissolution that warrants its deployment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Badiou, Alain. 1994. “Gilles Deleuze, The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque.” In Gilles Deleuze and the Theater of Philosophy, edited by Constantin V. Boundas and Dorothea Olkowski, 51–69. London: Routledge.
———. 2009. Pocket Pantheon: Figures of Postwar Philosophy. Translated by David Macey. London: Verso. Originally Petit Panthéon Portatif. Paris: Éditions la Fabrique, 2008.
Bartlett, A.J. 2011. Badiou and Plato: An Education By Truths. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bova, John, and Paul Livingston. 2017. “Univocity, Duality, and Ideal Genesis: Deleuze and Plato.” In Contemporary Encounters with Ancient Metaphysics, edited by Abraham Jacob Greenstine and Ryan J. Johnson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Johnson, Ryan J. 2016. The Deleuze-Lucretius Encounter. Plateaus—New Directions in Deleuze Studies Series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Lampert, Jay. 2015. “Deleuze’s ‘Power of Decision’, Kant’s = X, and Husserl’s Noema.” In At The Edges of Thought: Deleuze and Post-Kantian Philosophy, edited by Craig Lundy and Daniela Voss, 272–292. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Nail, Thomas. 2017. “Lucretius and the Immanence of Motion.” The Immanent Frame: Secularism, Religion, and the Public Sphere. Social Science Research Council (SSRC). Available Online: https://tif.ssrc.org/2017/09/19/lucretius-and-the-immanence-of-motion/. Accessed 5 January 2018.
Peden, Knox. 2014. Spinoza Contra Phenomenology: French Rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze. Cultural Memory in the Present Series, edited by Hent de Vries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Vartabedian, Becky with Nathan Eckstrand. 2017. “Early Career Research Spotlight: Becky Vartabedian.” Blog of the American Philosophical Association. https://blog.apaonline.org/2017/11/15/early-career-research-spotlight-rebecca-vartebedian/. Accessed 15 November 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vartabedian, B. (2018). Conclusion: Multiplicity, Ontology, Deleuze, Badiou. In: Multiplicity and Ontology in Deleuze and Badiou. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76837-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76837-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76836-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76837-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)