Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Biology Limit Equality?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Gender

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

This chapter provides a brief overview of theory and research that has investigated the relationship between physiology and gender difference with an eye toward understanding the role that biology may play in facilitating or inhibiting social equality. We present one extended example that simultaneously examined biological and social theories as structuring individual-level variation in women’s personality traits to document the complicated interplay of the biological and the social across the life course. We extend our analysis to discuss implications for the study of race and acknowledge the benefical contributions that intersex and transgender individuals’ experiences bring to bear on the study of the relationship between physiology and gender difference. We conlude by noting that though the road to equality is hard and paved with setbacks, it is not bound by biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold, A. P. (2009). Mouse models for evaluating sex chromosome effects that cause sex differences in non-gonadal tissues. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 21, 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, A. P., & Breedlove, S. M. (1985). Organizational and activational effects of sex steroids on brain and behavior: A reanalysis. Hormones and Behavior, 19, 469–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, A. P., & Chen, X. (2009). What does the “four core genotypes” mouse model tell us about sex differences in the brain and other tissues? Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. B., Berkley, K. J., Geary, N., Hampson, E., Herman, J., & Young, E. (Eds.). (2008). Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, R. (2015). The emperor’s new genes science, public policy, and the allure of objectivity. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 661(1), 130–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, S. A., Blakemore, J. E. O., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). A role for biology in gender-related behavior. Sex Roles, 64, 804–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, C. M., Eccles, J. S., & Becker, J. B. (1992). Are adolescents the victims of raging hormones: Evidence for activational effects of hormones on moods and behavior at adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 62–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, F. A. (2008). Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 29, 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. M., & Galef, B. G. (1998). Effects of intrauterine position on the behavior and genital morphology of litter-bearing rodents. Developmental Neuropsychology, 14, 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Bendahan, C. C. C., van de Beek, C., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behaviors: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 29, 353–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, C. (2010). Doing, undoing, or redoing gender? Learning from the workplace experiences of transpeople. Gender & Society, 24(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (2015). Contesting intersex: The dubious diagnosis. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., & Murphy, E. L. (2013). Intersex bodies as states of exception: An empirical explanation for unnecessary surgical modification. Feminist Formations, 25(2), 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., & Risman, B. J. (2015). Feminists wrestle with testosterone: Hormones, socialization, and cultural expectations as predictors of women’s gendered selves. Social Science Research, 49, 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Medeiros, C. B., Rees, S. L., Llinas, M., Fleming, A. S., & Crews, D. (2010). Deconstructing early life experiences: Distinguishing the contributions of prenatal and postnatal factors to adult male sexual behavior in the rat. Psychological Science, 21, 1494–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., Hanish, L. D., Anders, M. C., & MaddenDerdich, D. A. (2003). Early school competence: The roles of sexsegregated play and effortful control. Developmental Psychology, 39, 848–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabes, R. A., Shepard, A. S., Guthrie, I. K., & Martin, C. L. (1997). Roles of temperamental arousal and gender segregated play in young children’s social adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, N. L., Berenbaum, S. A., & McHale, S. M. (2009). Gender development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol. 1: Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 305–357). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibber, J. R., & Goy, R. W. (1985). Infant-directed behavior in young rhesus monkeys: Sex differences and effects of prenatal androgens. American Journal of Primatology, 8, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., Horton, N. J., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness, V. S., et al. (2001). Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 490–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. (2003). Sexual natures: How feminism changed evolutionary biology. Signs, 28, 901–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goy, R. W., & McEwen, B. S. (1980). Sexual differentiation of the brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grön, G., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., Tomczak, R., & Riepe, M. W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: Gender different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 404–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1905). Adolescence. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, S., & Canli, T. (2004). Individual differences in emotional processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, E. (2007). Endocrine contributions to sex differences in visuospatial perception and cognition. In J. B. Becker, K. J. Berkley, N. Geary, E. Hampson, J. Herman, & E. Young (Eds.), Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior (pp. 311–328). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1997). Raising Darwin’s consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 8, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brain storm. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Young, R., & Rumiati, R. I. (2012). Hardwired for sexism? Approaches to sex/gender in neuroscience. Neuroethics, 5(3), 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennelly, I., Merz, S., & Lorber, L. (2001). What is gender? American Sociological Review, 66, 598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenroot, R. K., Gogtay, N., Greenstein, D. K., Wells, E. M., Wallace, G. L., Clasen, L. S., et al. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage, 15, 1065–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, P. M., & Sundermann, E. (2009). Hormone therapy and cognitive function. Human Reproduction Update, 15, 667–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2004). Gender as social institution. Social Forces, 82, 1249–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 689–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., Dolezal, C., Baker, S. W., Ehrhardt, A. A., & New, M. I. (2006). Gender development in women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia as a function of disorder severity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 667–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E., & Costello, C. Y. (2001). The limits of biological determinism. American Sociological Review, 66, 592–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972). Man and woman, boy and girl: Differentiation and dimorphism of gender identity from conception to maturity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morning, A. (2014). And you thought we had moved beyond all that: Biological race returns to the social sciences. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 1676–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenström, A., Servin, A., Bohlin, G., Larsson, A., & Wedell, A. (2002). Sex-typed toy play behavior correlates with the degree of prenatal androgen exposure assessed by CYP21 genotype in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 87, 5119–5124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish, A. R., & De Waal, F. B. M. (2000). The other “closest living relative”: How bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra- and intersexual interactions, and hominid evolution. In D. LeCroy & P. Moller (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human reproductive behavior (pp. 97–113). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasterski, V. L., Geffner, M. E., Brain, C., Hindmarsh, P., Brook, C., & Hines, M. (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development, 76, 264–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pembrey, M., Bygren, L., Kaati, G., Edvinsson, S., Northstone, K., Sjöström, M. et al. (2006). Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14, 159–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, C. H., Goy, R. W., Gerall, A. A., & Young, W. C. (1959). Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology, 65, 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, C. H., Slob, A. K., & Goy, R. W. (1973). Effects of castration and replacement therapy on sexual behavior of adult male rhesuses. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 84, 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, S. M., Roy, M. M., Thornton, J. E., & Goy, R. W. (1985). Expression of adult female patterns of sexual behavior by male, female, and pseudohermaphroditic female rhesus monkeys. Biology of Reproduction, 33, 878–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., Cárdenas, R. A., Bailey, D. H., Burriss, R. P., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2010). Salivary testosterone does not predict mental rotation performance in men or women. Hormones and Behavior, 58, 282–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quetelet, L. A. J. (1830/1969). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties (R. Knox & F. L Gainesville, Trans.). Scholars Facsimiles and Reprints. (Original work published 1830; trans. 1842).

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, S. M. (2006). Sex differences in regional brain structure and function. In P. W. Kaplan (Ed.), Neurologic disease in women (2nd ed., pp. 15–26). New York: Demos Medical Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B. J. (2001). Calling the bluff of value-free science. American Sociological Review, 66, 605–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., Roeltgen, D., & Zinn, A. (2006). Cognition and the sex chromosomes: Studies in turner syndrome. Hormone Research, 65, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2006). Gene–environment interplay and psychopathology: Multiple varieties but real effects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 226–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman, E. J., & Dorn, L. D. (2009). Puberty: Its role in development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol. 1: Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 116–151). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (2000). Biological limits of gender construction. American Sociological Review, 65, 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, L. (2013). The new science of sex difference. Sociology Compass, 7(4), 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9(1), 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28(1), 32–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. A. (1976). Sex differences in intellectual functioning: How much of a difference do genes make? Sex Roles, 2, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. George Mason University, Fairfax, USA

    Shannon N. Davis

  2. U.S. Census Bureau, Prince George’s, USA

    Alysia Blake

Authors
  1. Shannon N. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alysia Blake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shannon N. Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Barbara J. Risman

  2. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, USA

    Carissa M. Froyum

  3. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    William J. Scarborough

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davis, S.N., Blake, A. (2018). Does Biology Limit Equality?. In: Risman, B., Froyum, C., Scarborough, W. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76332-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76333-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation