Skip to main content

Urban Productive Landscapes: Designing Nature for Re-acting Neo-liberal City

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neo-liberalism and the Architecture of the Post Professional Era

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 792 Accesses

Abstract

In the world of urbanism, architecture and landscape, new paradigms are currently changing the way people think about or interact with economic crisis, quality of life and self-made practices. In a scenario where the scale and pace of market-driven urbanization and ephemeral landscapes of pop-up settlements are challenging the notion of permanence as a basic planning principle, the regeneration of the city in the twenty-first century aims to the definition of multi-level approaches associated with emergent socio-spatial challenges. Many of the most promising ideas in this field are that of the reformulation, reclamation and recycle of variable patterns of open spaces as real generators of urban life. This paper presents a theoretical framework, understanding how urban regeneration processes, through the ‘bottom-up’ redevelopment of residual spaces, can represent an attempt to reduce degradation of peri-urban fragile environments and to find environmentally compatible ways of increasing the definition of urban productive landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Only 11% of the land is suitable for agricultural production without improvements made by man or by external devices, and its intensive use in the long period impoverishes greatly the quality of the soil. All over the world, 75% of the soil put in production is compromised by erosion with a peak of 62% in Europe. Every year we lost from 5 to 7 million hectares of arable lands. The greatest risk is posed by water erosion and the poor drainage (affecting 55% of cases), followed by the low absorption of nutrients and by the high level of acidity/salinity (28%). Source: FAOSTAT (2012) http://faostat.fao.org/.

  2. 2.

    According to FAO definition, food security is defined as «… the achievement of a condition where everyone has the opportunity to access to enough food to satisfy own nutritional needs and food preferences to lead an active and healthy life». This definition also includes a large extent to Safety, even if the latter receives much less attention in the international discussion.

  3. 3.

    Ecological footprint has emerged as one of the world’s leading measure of human demand on nature. Firstly introduced by Wackernagel and Rees (1998), today this quantitative and qualitative assessment measurement is used to define the ecological deficit of a region per number of inhabitants, compared with many other statistical data define an important benchmark for our planet’s health. Source: Global Footprint Network (2016) http://www.footprintnetwork.org/.

  4. 4.

    Our Common Future, technically known as Brundtland Report, is a document issued in 1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) where the concept of ‘sustainable development’ has been introduced as the capacity to satisfy the needs of present population without compromising the future generations.

  5. 5.

    The Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 was the first global meeting on issues relating to the environment. It was attended by 172 governments to build a synthesis framework on the strategic issues of the ecology that led to the drafting of the Kyoto Protocol, of local development programmes (Agenda 21) and of the Conventions on climate change and biological diversity.

  6. 6.

    The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) establishes the concept of ecosystem services as supporting natural benefits for living beings. The report entails four different categories: life support (all earth’s primary production, such as soil, water, air-wind, vegetation), procurement (nutrients, food and finite resources), regulation (natural cycle for climate, water and soil regeneration) and health and well-being (education, recreational, aesthetic and spiritual values).

  7. 7.

    In the discipline of ecology, the term resilience describes the capacity of a system to absorb shock or external influencing forces, by adapting its configuration and enabling different responses for restoring the equilibrium. In ecology, different properties can be used to measure the resilience attitude of an ecosystem, such as the degree of biodiversity, the multiplication of uses (redundancy), the self-regenerating capacity of a terrain, the panarchy (mutual influence between level of hierarchies in a context).

  8. 8.

    The application of ecological resilience to urban and territorial studies is not an easy task and represents an area of academic interesting of growing importance that can be subdivided in the following principle lines: climate urgencies, transition towards sustainable energy resources, ecological remediation and mitigation, disaster recovery, socio-ecological systems (Pickett et al. 2004; Colding 2007; Scotti-Petrillo and Prosperi 2011; Wilkinson 2011).

  9. 9.

    Critical regionalism is a design approach different from vernacularism, which attempts to face the loss of distinctive character of the International Style, providing renewed architectural principles but rooted into site-specific cultural context. The term was coined by A. Tzonis and L. Lefaivre and then theorized by K. Frampton, and illustrated in the publication Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance.

  10. 10.

    The term territorialism is defined an approach to urbanism and planning based on the school of A. Magnaghi with other Italian academicians, which is focused on the local qualitative and on self-sustainable development. This approach intends to combine a deeper background knowledge of local arts and crafts and cultural heritage, with reference to bio-regionalism of P. Geddes, and the idea of self-government and place-consciousness.

  11. 11.

    The High Line (2006–2009) is a linear park designed by Diller Scofidio + Renfro and Field Operations, on a disused section of New York’s West Side Line. An agri-tecture project which alternates landscape inspired rooms with gradients and colours of pioneer plant species. Source: Dimendberg E (2013) Diller Scofidio + Renfro: Architecture after Images, Monacelli Press: New York.

  12. 12.

    The conversion of the Val d’en Joan landfill into a landscape for agriculture and energy production on the part of Battle y Roig is supported by three key themes: the topography, water and vegetation. Source: Abitare la Terra, n.37/2015 Geoarchitettura.

  13. 13.

    The intervention of Studio Terragni proposes the reuse in the two decommissioned highway tunnels under the hill of Piedicastello in Trento, merging recycled components of contemporary restoration. Source: Terragni E. (2010) Tunnel REvision: le gallerie di Piedicastello; The Trento Tunnels, Fondazione Museo storico del Trentino, Cataloghi XII Biennale di Architettura di Venezia.

References

  • Brenner N, Theodore N (2002) Cities and the geographies of actually existing neoliberalism. Antipode 34:349–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsjens GJ, van der Knaap W (2002) Strategic land-use allocation: dealing with spatial relationships and fragmentation of agriculture. Landsc Urban Plan 58:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clèment G (2003) Manifeste du Tiers-Paysage. Montreuil, Editions Sujet/Objet

    Google Scholar 

  • Colding J (2007) Ecological land-use complementation for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 81:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner J (1999) Recovering landscape: essays in contemporary landscape architecture. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deelstra T, Girardet H (2000) Urban agriculture and sustainable cities. In: Bakker N, Dubbeling M et al (eds) Growing cities, growing food, urban agriculture on the policy agenda. Feldafing, DSE, pp 99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Donadieu P (1998) Campagnes Urbaines. Actes Sud, Ecole Nationale Superiore du Paysage, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher A (2000) Urban and peri-urban agriculture and urban planning, thematic paper for FAO-ETC/RUAF ‘urban and periurban agriculture on the policy agenda’, University of Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton K (1983) Towards a critical regionalism: six points for an architecture of resistance. In: Foster H (ed) The anti-aesthetic. Bay Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Gausa M (2012) Re-naturalizing the multi-city. In: Ricci M (ed) New paradigms. Actar-List, Trento, pp 50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardet H (2004) Cities people planet. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom G (2005) Methodological review of existing classifications. In: Wascher DM (ed) European landscape character areas. Typologies, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes, pp 32–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll R (2012) Sprawltown: looking for the city on its edges. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzani A (2003) Il paesaggio italiano. Roma, Meltemi

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnaghi A (2005) Local self-sustainable development: subjects of transformation. Tailoring Bio-technologies 1:79–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostafavi M, Doherty G (2010) Ecological urbanism. Baden, Lars Muller

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault T, Martin P (2005) Geographies of neoliberalism in Latin America. Environ Plan 37:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S, Cadenasso M, Grove M (2004) Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic and planning realms. Landsc Urban Plan 69:369–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricci M (2012) New Paradigms. Barcelona Trento, Actar-List

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder J, Weigert K (2010) Landraum beyond rural design. Jovis, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotti-Petrillo A, Prosperi D (2011) Metaphors from the resilience literature: guidance for planners. In: Schrenk M (ed) Proceedings of REAL CORP 2011, pp 601–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Fragkias M, Güneralp B, Reilly MK (2011) A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. Paper published on PLoSOne http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenjing H, Fulong W (2009) China’s emerging neoliberal urbanism: perspectives from urban redevelopment. Antipode 41:282–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit J, Nasr J, Ratta A (2001) Urban agriculture: food, jobs and sustainable cities. United Nations Development Programme, The Urban Agriculture Network, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommariva E (2014) Creating city. Urban agriculture. Strategies for city resilience. Listlab, Trento-Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Turri E (2000) La megalopoli padana. Venezia, Marsilio

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen A, Bohn K, Howe J (2005) Continuous productive urban landscapes: designing urban agriculture for sustainable cities. Architectural Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio P (1996) La freccia del tempo. Domus Dossier, 4, June 1996 “Alta Velocità, Treni e Stazioni”

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W (1998) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldheim C (2006) The landscape urbanism reader. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White M, Przybylski M (2010) Bracket, architecture, environment: on Farming, Actar: Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson C (2011) Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Plan Theory 4:1–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuele Sommariva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sommariva, E. (2018). Urban Productive Landscapes: Designing Nature for Re-acting Neo-liberal City. In: Sadri, H. (eds) Neo-liberalism and the Architecture of the Post Professional Era. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76267-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics