Skip to main content

Automatic Full Femur Segmentation from Computed Tomography Datasets Using an Atlas-Based Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Methods and Clinical Applications in Musculoskeletal Imaging (MSKI 2017)

Abstract

Automatic segmentation of femurs in clinical computed tomography remains a challenge. Joints degraded by old age are a particularly challenging dataset to segment. The objective of this study is to evaluate existing methods and propose an alternative method for segmentation of femurs in clinical computed tomography datasets for joints degraded by old age. Bilateral hip computed tomography scans of three cadaveric specimens (six femurs) were available for this study. Deformable registration using an affine selection criterion was used for atlas-based segmentation. For comparison, the six femurs were also segmented with two graph-cut algorithms. An automatic graph-cut segmentation algorithm was only able to separate the femur from the pelvis in two of the six femurs due to a limitation of graph-cuts. The atlas-based method produced consistent automatic segmentations for all degraded joints. In conclusion, atlas-based femur segmentation performs considerably better than an automatic graph-cut algorithm when applied to degraded joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 60.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://simtk.org/projects/mitk-gem.

  2. 2.

    http://elastix.isi.uu.nl.

  3. 3.

    http://elastix.bigr.nl/wiki/index.php/Par0046.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/mkrcah/bone-segmentation.

References

  1. Pickhardt, P., Pooler, B., Lauder, T., del Rio, A., Bruce, R., Binkley, N.: Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann. Intern. Med. 158(8), 588–595 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burge, R., Dawson-Hughes, B., Solomon, D., Wong, J., King, A., Tosteson, A.: Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J. Bone Miner. Res. 22(3), 465–475 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zoroofi, R., Sato, Y., Sasama, T., Nishii, T., Sugano, N., Yonenobu, K., Yoshikawa, H., Ochi, T., Tamura, S.: Automated segmentation of acetabulum and femoral head from 3-D CT images. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 7(4), 329–343 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, Y., Engelke, K., Kalender, W.: A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22(5), 586–598 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boykov, Y., Funka-Lea, G.: Graph cuts and efficient N-D image segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vision 70(2), 109–131 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pauchard, Y., Fitze, T., Browarnik, D., Eskandari, A., Pauchard, I., Enns-Bray, W., Pálsson, H., Sigurdsson, S., Ferguson, S., Harris, T., Gudnason, V., Helgason, B.: Interactive graph-cut segmentation for fast creation of finite element models from clinical CT data for hip fracture prediction. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 19(16), 1693–1703 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krčah, M., Székely, G., Blanc, R.: Fully automatic and fast segmentation of the femur bone from 3D-CT images with no shape prior. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging - ISBI 2011, pp. 2087–2090. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Descoteaux, M., Audette, M., Chinzei, K., Siddiqi, K.: Bone enhancement filtering: application to sinus bone segmentation and simulation of pituitary surgery. Comput. Aided Surg. 11(5), 247–255 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrhardt, J., Handels, H., Malina, T., Strathmann, B., Plötz, W., Pöppl, S.: Atlas-based segmentation of bone structures to support the virtual planning of hip operations. Int. J. Med. Inform. 64(2–3), 439–447 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thirion, J.: Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell’s demons. Med. Image Anal. 2(3), 243–260 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitmarsh, T., Treece, G.M., Poole, K.E.S.: Automatic segmentation and discrimination of connected joint bones from CT by multi-atlas registration. In: Yao, J., Klinder, T., Li, S. (eds.) Computational Methods and Clinical Applications for Spine Imaging. LNCVB, vol. 17, pp. 199–207. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07269-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Aljabar, P., Heckemann, R., Hammers, A., Hajnal, J., Rueckert, D.: Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy. NeuroImage 46(3), 726–738 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever, M., Pluim, J.: Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(1), 196–205 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dice, L.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26(3), 297–302 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huttenlocher, D., Klanderman, G., Rucklidge, W.: Comparing images using the hausdorff distance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15(9), 850–863 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., Maurer, C.: Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage 21(4), 1428–1442 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank NSERC CGS-M for funding, the Body Donation Program at the Gross Anatomy Laboratory for access to cadaveric specimens, and the individuals who graciously contributed their bodies. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Sonny Chan from the Department of Computer Science at the University of Calgary for guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven K. Boyd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Besler, B.A., Michalski, A.S., Forkert, N.D., Boyd, S.K. (2018). Automatic Full Femur Segmentation from Computed Tomography Datasets Using an Atlas-Based Approach. In: Glocker, B., Yao, J., Vrtovec, T., Frangi, A., Zheng, G. (eds) Computational Methods and Clinical Applications in Musculoskeletal Imaging. MSKI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10734. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74113-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74113-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74112-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74113-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics