Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Governance Framework for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Insights from the Case of the German Wood-based Bioeconomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Increasing the sustainability of economic processes and products requires a path transition from the present, predominantly fossil resource-based “throughput economy” towards a renewable resource-based circular flow economy. The bioeconomy concept can contribute to such a transition. However, an adequate governance framework is necessary not only to overcome the current carbon lock-in and create fair competitive framework conditions for bioeconomy processes and products (enabling function), but also to ensure the sustainability of an increased use of bio-based resources (limiting function). At the same time, achieving a path transition is challenging due to, inter alia, interacting market failures which distort allocation decisions, and uncertainties about the economic, environmental and socio-economic impacts of different bio-based production pathways. Moreover, transitioning to a new “upper state” sustainability equilibrium requires a corresponding politico-economic equilibrium in markets for regulation that allows for the provision of necessary transition policies. In this chapter, we discuss the challenges of establishing an effective governance framework for the bioeconomy. Furthermore, focusing on the case of the German wood-based bioeconomy, we analyse how the enabling and limiting governance functions have been implemented in practice. Based on this, we identify scope for improvements. In particular, the case study highlights the important role that policies have to play in establishing fair competitive framework conditions for bioeconomy applications, fostering innovation and safeguarding sustainability. While existing measures remain fragmented and insufficient to initiate a path transition, gradually developing them further may contribute to a dynamic that stimulates demand for more far-reaching transition policies on political markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Pannicke et al. (2015), Hagemann et al. (2016) for an analysis of the status quo of the wood-based bioeconomy in Germany.

References

  • Adler P, Budzinski M, Erdmann G, Majer S, Meisel K, Schock S, Thrän D (2015), Sachstandsbericht über vorhandene Grundlagen für ein Monitoring der Bioökonomie: Nachhaltigkeit und Ressourcenbasis der Bioökonomie, Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur BW (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz A (2009) Politik in Mehrebenensystemen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz A, Lütz S, Schimank U, Simonis G (2007) Einleitung. In: Benz A, Lütz S, Schimank U, Simonis G (eds) Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndes G, Hansson J (2007) Bioenergy expansion in the EU: cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels. Energy Policy 35(12):5965–5979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMEL (2014) National policy strategy on bioeconomy. Renewable resources and biotechnological processes as a basis for food, industry and energy, German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu S, Schütz H, Pengue W, O´Brien M, Garcia F, Sims R et al (2014) Assessing global land use: balancing consumption with sustainable supply. UNEP/International Resource Panel, Nairobi/Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carus M, Dammer L (2013) Food or non-food: which agricultural feedstocks are best for industrial uses? Ind Biotechnol 9(4):171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carus M, Eder A, Beckmann J (2014a) Industry report: GreenPremium prices along the value chain of biobased products. Ind Biotechnol 10(2):83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carus M, Raschka A, Fehrenbach H, Rettenmaier N, Dammer L, Köppen S et al (2014) Ökologische Innovationspolitik – Mehr Ressourceneffizienz und Klimaschutz durch nachhaltige stoffliche Nutzungen von Biomasse, Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6(3):185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Besi M, McCormick K (2015) Towards a bioeconomy in Europe: national, regional and industrial strategies. Sustainability 7(8):10461–10478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit AK (1996) The making of economic policy: a transaction-cost politics perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2012) Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe, European Commission (EC)/Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2016), Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). COM(2016) 767 final, European Commission (EC), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman M (1964) The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards R, Szekeres S, Neuwahl F, Mahieu V (2008) Biofuels in the European context: facts and uncertainties. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Petten

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger R (2016) Assessment of uncertain returns from investment in short rotation coppice using risk adjusted discount rates. Biomass Bioenerg 85:320–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer C, Newell RG (2008) Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J Environ Econ Manage 55(2):142–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FNR (2014) Marktanalyse Nachwachsende Rohstoffe. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (FNR), Gülzow-Prüzen

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon TJ, Gross R, Chase A, Howes J, Arnall A, Anderson D (2005) UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures. Energy Policy 33(16):2123–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer LJ, van der Lans IA, Fischer ARH, Reinders MJ, Menozzi D, Zhang X et al (2013) Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol 30(2):142–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn EG, Richter R (2005) Institutions and economic theory: the contribution of the new institutional economics, 2nd edn. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gawel E, Purkus A (2015) The role of energy and electricity taxation in the context of the German energy transition. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 39(2):77–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German Bioeconomy Council (2015a) Bioeconomy policy (Part I). Synopsis and analysis of strategies in the G7, Bioökonomierat, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • German Bioeconomy Council (2015b) Bioeconomy policy (Part II). Synopsis of national strategies around the world, Bioökonomierat, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • German Bioeconomy Council (2015c) Die deutsche Chemieindustrie – Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Bioökonomie. BÖRMEMO 02, Bioökonomierat, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Flanders (2013) Bioeconomy in Flanders. The vision and strategy of the Government of Flanders for a sustainable and competitive bioeconomy in 2030, Flemish Government, Environment, Nature and Energy Department, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubler A, Aguayo F, Gallagher K, Hekkert M, Jiang K, Mytelka L et al. (2012) Policies for the energy technology innovation system (ETIS), In GEA (ed), Global energy assessment—toward a sustainable future. Cambridge University Press/IIASA, Cambridge, pp 1665–1744

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann N, Gawel E, Purkus A, Hauck J, Pannicke N (2016) Possible futures towards a wood-based bioeconomy—a scenario analysis for Germany. Sustainability 8(98):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansjürgens B (2000) Symbolische Umweltpolitik – Eine Erklärung aus Sicht der Neuen Politischen Ökonomie. In: Hansjürgens B, Lübbe-Wolff G (eds) Symbolische Umweltpolitik, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp 144–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm D (2010) Government failure, rent-seeking, and capture: the design of climate change policy. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 26(2):182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann F, Sanden J, Schomerus T, Schulze F (2012) Ressourcenschutzrecht – Ziele, Herausforderungen, Regelungsvorschläge. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 23(10):523–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson S, Lauber V (2006) The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34(3):256–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54(2–3):164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowski P, Tegner H, Kotte S (1997) Strategien umweltpolitischer Zielfindung: eine ökonomische Perspektive. LIT, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JD (2014) Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: what are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design? Energy Policy 69:467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay A, Ackrill R (2012) Governing the transition to a biofuels economy in the US and EU: accommodating value conflicts, implementing uncertainty. Policy and Society 31(4):295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch N, Fuss S, Grosjean G, Edenhofer O (2014) Causes of the EU ETS price drop: recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything?—New Evidence. Energy Policy 73:676–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köck W, Kern K (2006) Öffentlich-rechtliche Kontrolle von Umweltrisiken, insbesondere Probleme und Perspektiven der europäischen Chemikalienkontrolle. In: Vieweg K (ed) Risiko - Recht - Verantwortung, Heymanns Verlag, Köln, pp 279–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahl U (2014) Bioökonomie für den Klima- und Ressourcenschutz – Regulative Handlungskorridore, BZL Kommunikation und Projektsteuerung/NABU (Nature And Biodiversity Conservation Union), Berlin/Oyten

    Google Scholar 

  • Landesregierung Nordrhein-Westfalen (2013) Eckpunkte einer Bioökonomiestrategie für Nordrhein-Westfalen, Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchs MG, Naylor RW, Irwin JR, Raghunathan R (2010) The sustainability liability: potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. J Mark 74(5):18–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig G, Tronicke C, Köck W, Gawel E (2014) Rechtsrahmen der Bioökonomie in Mitteldeutschland – Bestandsaufnahme und Bewertung. UFZ Discussion Paper 22/2014, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig G, Tronicke C, Köck W, Gawel E (2015) Der Rechtsrahmen für die Bioökonomie in Deutschland. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 68(2):41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig G, Gawel E, Pannicke N (2016) Kreislaufwirtschaft im Bereich Holz – Rechtliche Bestandsaufnahme und Reformvorschläge für Kaskadennutzungen. Zeitschrift für das Recht der Abfallwirtschaft (AbfallR) 15(4):170–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantau U (2012) Holzrohstoffbilanz Deutschland – Entwicklungen und Szenarien des Holzaufkommens und der Holzverwendung von 1987 bis 2015. Universität Hamburg, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R (2005) Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? In: Schuppert GF (ed) Governance-Forschung. Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien, Nomos, Baden Baden, pp 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick K (2011) The emerging bio-economy in Europe: exploring the key governance challenges. World Renewable Energy Congress 2011, 8–13 May 2011, Linköping, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick K, Kautto N (2013) The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability 5(6):2589–2608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick RE, Tollison RD (1981) Politicians, legislation and the economy: an inquiry into the interest-group theory of government. Martinus-Nijhoff, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Nausch H, Sautter C, Broer I, Schmidt K (2015) Public funded field trials with transgenic plants in Europe: A Comparison between Germany and Switzerland. Curr Opin Biotechnol 32:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard RB (1992) Sustainability as intergenerational equity: economic theory and environmental planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev 12(1–2):85–124

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober S (2015) Noch ganz am Anfang. Viele offene Fragen beim Ausbau der Bioökonomie, Available online 18 April 2016: https://www.nabu.de/umwelt-und-ressourcen/ressourcenschonung/biooekonomie/19308.html

  • OECD (2009) The Bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ollikainen M (2014) Forestry in Bioeconomy—smart green growth for the humankind. Scand J For Res 29(4):360–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacini H, Assunção L, van Dam J, Toneto R Jr (2013) The price for biofuels sustainability. Energy Policy 59:898–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannicke N, Gawel E, Hagemann N, Purkus A, Strunz S (2015) The political economy of fostering a wood-based bioeconomy in Germany. Ger J Agric Econ 64(4):224–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfau SF, Hagens JE, Dankbaar B, Smits AJM (2014) Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research. Sustainability 6(3):1222–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkus A (2016) Concepts and instruments for a rational bioenergy policy. A new institutional economics approach. Lecture notes in energy, vol 55, Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkus A, Hagemann N, Bedtke N, Gawel E (2017) Towards a sustainable innovation system for the German wood-based bioeconomy: implications for policy design. J Cleaner Prod. online first: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.146

  • Rhodes RAW (1996) The new governance: governing without government. Polit Stud 44(4):652–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson B (2012) From a fossil-fuel to a bio-based economy: the politics of industrial biotechnology. Environ Plann C: Government and Policy 30(2):282–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin EF et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodi M, Sina S, Görlach B, Gerstetter C, Bausch C, Neubauer A (2011) Das Klimaschutzrecht des Bundes – Analyse und Vorschläge zu seiner Weiterentwicklung. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarlat N, Dallemand J-F (2011) Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: a global overview. Energy Policy 39(3):1630–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf FW (1997) Games real actors play. Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research, Westview Press, Boulder, CO/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert R, Blasch J (2010) Sustainability standards for bioenergy: a means to reduce climate change risks? Energy Policy 38(6):2797–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staffas L, Gustavsson M, McCormick K (2013) Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: an analysis of official national approaches. Sustainability 5(6):2751–2769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strunz S, Gawel E, Lehmann P (2016) The political economy of renewable energy policies in Germany and the EU. Utilities Policy 42:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet CM, Eterovic Maggio DS (2015) Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation? World Dev 66:665–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12):817–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeulen V, Van der Steen M, Stevens CV, Van Huylenbroeck G (2012) Industry expectations regarding the transition towards a biobased economy. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 6(4):453–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verwer CC, Buiteveld J, Koelewijn HP, Tolkamp GW, de Vries SMG, Meer PJ (2010) Genetically modified trees: status, trends and potential risks. Alterra Report 2039. Alterra Wageningen UR, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (2008) Future bioenergy and sustainable land use, German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1996) The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J Econ Liter 38:595–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1983) Redefining the issues of risk and public acceptance. Futures 15(1):13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, and Institute for Infrastructure and Resources Management, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Erik Gawel

  2. Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Alexandra Purkus, Nadine Pannicke & Nina Hagemann

Authors
  1. Erik Gawel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Purkus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nadine Pannicke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nina Hagemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Gawel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Sciences, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. “Constantin Brancusi” University of Târgu Jiu, Târgu Jiu, Romania

    Diana Mihaela Pociovălișteanu

  3. Department of Management, College of Business, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

    Paulo Roberto Borges de Brito

  4. Institute for Agrarian & Regional Development, Federal University of Southern and Southeastern Pará, Marabá, Pará, Brazil

    Ismar Borges de Lima

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., Hagemann, N. (2018). A Governance Framework for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Insights from the Case of the German Wood-based Bioeconomy. In: Leal Filho, W., Pociovălișteanu, D., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I. (eds) Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation